Cited by 2,780Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationGame Theory and Voting Systems

Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment

Open access
Fischbacher, Urs, Gächter, Simon, Fehr, Ernst·2001·Economics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-1765(01)00394-9

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In repeated public goods games, only a few individuals tend to be altruists or free-riders.

    “Moreover, it has also been observed that, in repeated public goods games, most people behave like conditional cooperators—individuals willing to cooperate if a critical number of others do so—and only a few individuals tend to be altruists (i.e., unconditional cooperators) or free-riders16,17,27,75,76.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Most people behave like conditional cooperators, individuals willing to cooperate if a critical number of others do so.

    “Moreover, it has also been observed that, in repeated public goods games, most people behave like conditional cooperators—individuals willing to cooperate if a critical number of others do so—and only a few individuals tend to be altruists (i.e., unconditional cooperators) or free-riders16,17,27,75,76.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Behavioural experiments on the PGG have shown that most people contribute to the common pool, and only a few individuals free ride.

    “However, contrary to the predictions made by standard game theory, behavioural experiments on the PGG have shown that most people contribute to the common pool, and only a few individuals free ride16,16,26,27.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

  • People are also more likely to cooperate when they believe that others are cooperating.

    “People are also more likely to cooperate when they believe that others are cooperating 191 .”
  • Many people increase their contribution to a public good if others also increase their contributions, although, in material terms, each individual has a strict incentive to contribute nothing.

    “It is shown by Croson (2000), Fischbacher, Gächter and Fehr (2001), and Falk and Fischbacher (2001) that many people increase their contribution to a public good if others also increase their contributions, although, in material terms, each individual has a strict incentive to contribute nothing.”

    From Psychological foundations of incentives (2002) · cites this paper as Fischbacher, Gächter and Fehr (2001)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of St.Gallen (CH)
Corresponding author
Fischbacher, Urs
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-06
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
397-404
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125314754
Cited by
2,780
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 171 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 143 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 138 · 2015: 159 · 2014: 134 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 119
FWCI
136.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
Keywords
conditional cooperation, public goods game, free-riding, one-shot games, strategy method, cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review