Cited by 135Endometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive System and PregnancyEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Regulatory T cells and other leukocytes in the pathogenesis of endometriosis

Berbic, M., Fraser, I.S.·2011·Journal of Reproductive Immunology

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common and puzzling gynaecological condition which shows a great deal of variability between women. It affects up to 15% of all women of reproductive age. There is a strong familial component, but the aetiology and pathogenesis are still uncertain. Endometriosis is an 'inflammatory' condition with substantial numbers of leukocytes recruited into the lesion sites. There is increasing evidence to demonstrate marked changes in numbers and functions of these leukocytes in the eutopic endometrium and peritoneal fluid as well as in the lesions. We hypothesise that endometriosis is primarily an endometrial disease with underlying genetic disturbances which lead to a number of major molecular changes in function, enhancing the likelihood that viable fragments of endometrial tissue will pass through the fallopian tubes and attach and grow on the peritoneum. We have demonstrated disturbances in the populations of T cells, B cells, mast cells, dendritic cells and macrophages within the endometrium and ectopic lesions, and are intrigued by the potential for changes in regulatory T cells to influence disease establishment and progression. Interestingly, we have shown that in endometriosis, naturally occurring FOXP3+ regulatory T cells fail to undergo the expected decline in number during the secretory phase, which may account for a decreased ability of newly recruited leukocytes to initiate effective immune responses against viable endometrial fragments, permitting their survival and subsequent establishment. To better understand the pathogenesis of endometriosis, we must learn about how the immune system recognises this disease and how the endometrial immune response is regulated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jri.2010.11.004

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berbic, M., & Fraser, I. S.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Fraser, I.S.
Venue
Journal of Reproductive Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
149-155
ISSN
0165-0378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048798995
Cited by
135
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Reproductive Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, regulatory T cells, Foxp3, leukocyte recruitment, endometrial immune response, mast cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells, peritoneal fluid, luteal phase, ectopic endometrium, pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Choristoma, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Uterus, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Forkhead Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review