Cited by 60Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsOmental and Epiploic Conditions

Nerve Fibers and Histopathology of Endometriosis-Harboring Peritoneum

Tulandi, Togas, Felemban, Afaf, Fong Chen, Moy·2001·The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists

Abstract

Study objective To evaluate the presence of nerve fibers and histopathology of normal peritoneum and endometriosis-harboring peritoneum. Design Prospective, nonrandomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). Setting University hospital. Materials Peritoneal specimen from 40 women with laparoscopic findings of endometriosis (24 confirmed histopathologically, group H, 16 diagnosed by laparoscopy, group L) and from 9 women with no endometriosis (controls). Intervention Histopathologic examination of peritoneal specimens with nerve fibers identified by immunocytochemistry staining with an antibody to neurofilament. Measurements and main results No differences in mean nerve score were seen among the three groups. Degrees of lymphocytic infiltration and mesothelial hyperplasia were higher in group H than in the other two groups (p <0.01 and <0.05, respectively). The degree of lymphocytic infiltration was significantly higher in group L than in the control group (p <0.05). There were no differences in all measurements between women in group H who experienced chronic pelvic pain and those who did not. Conclusion The presence of nerve fibers in peritoneum is not related to endometriosis. Endometriosis-harboring peritoneum contains more lymphocytic infiltration than normal peritoneum. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8(1):95-98, 2001)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60556-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tulandi, T., Felemban, A., & Fong Chen, M.
Affiliations
Royal Victoria Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Tulandi, Togas
Venue
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
95-98
ISSN
1074-3804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026202486
Cited by
60
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Omental and Epiploic Conditions
Keywords
endometriosis, peritoneum, nerve fibers, neurofilaments, lymphocyte infiltration, mesothelial hyperplasia, chronic pelvic pain, neurogenic inflammation
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Nerve Fibers, Peritoneum, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review