The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This measure is based on the original 40-item NPI (Raskin and Hall, 1979, 1981), was shown to be psychometrically sound (Ames et al., 2006) and is frequently used to measure narcissism in normal populations (e.g., Peterson et al., 2012; Owens et al., 2015).”
From Narcissistic Leaders and Their Victims: Followers Low on Self-Esteem and Low on Core Self-Evaluations Suffer Most (2018) · cites this paper as Ames et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“The authors discovered that ministers who measured high in narcissism-per the NPI-16 (Ames et al., 2006), a 16-item version of Raskin and Terry's (1988) 40-item Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI)-and low in intrinsic religiosity exhibited poor ethical judgment.”
From Humility and Servant-Leadership: Toward a Solution of Pastoral Narcissism (2024) · cites this paper as Ames et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5 · Cited by 3,414
Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201272002 · Cited by 3,041
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 · Cited by 2,273
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.890 · Cited by 2,267
Unraveling the Paradoxes of Narcissism: A Dynamic Self-Regulatory Processing Model
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1204_1 · Cited by 2,215
Revision of the Self-Monitoring Scale.
Lennox, R. D., & Wolfe, R. N. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1349 · Cited by 1,161
Narcissism: Theory and measurement.
Emmons, R. A. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.11 · Cited by 1,138
Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality.
Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19 · Cited by 1,042
John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.206 · Cited by 1,011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality Traits
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113514105 · Cited by 2,162
The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12018 · Cited by 1,619
Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006 · Cited by 1,504
“⁎⁎⁎ p b 0.001. by Ames et al. (2006), the current scores comprise ratings on a 5-point Likert scale using anchors of Strongly disagree (1) to Strongly agree (5) (e.g., “I am apt to show off if I get the chance”).”
MethodInfluentialInitial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory.
Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0016530 · Cited by 1,334
Stoet, G. (2016) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628316677643 · Cited by 1,484
“This type of selection of preferred items from pairs of sentences is sometimes used in psychological scales, such as the 16-item Narcissistic Personality Inventory (Ames, Rose, & Anderson, 2006).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Union College (US)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ames, Daniel R.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 440-450
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072616714
- Cited by
- 1,349
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- narcissism, Narcissistic Personality Inventory, personality assessment, self-enhancement, construct validity, respondent fatigue
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
