Cited by 194Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPersonality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Individual differences in authenticity and mindfulness as predictors of verbal defensiveness

Lakey, Chad E., Kernis, Michael H., Heppner, Whitney L., Lance, Charles E.·2008·Journal of Research in Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.05.002

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakey, C. E., Kernis, M. H., Heppner, W. L., & Lance, C. E.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Lakey, Chad E.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
230-238
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023802304
Cited by
194
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
authenticity, mindfulness, individual differences, self-threat, mediation, self-relevant information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review