Cited by 149Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Time frames and the distinction between affective and cognitive well-being

Open access
Luhmann, Maike, Hawkley, Louise C., Eid, Michael, Cacioppo, John T.·2012·Journal of Research in Personality

Abstract

We examined whether the empirical differences between affective well-being (AWB) and cognitive well-being (CWB) might be due to (a) the use of different time frames in measures of AWB and CWB or (b) structural differences. In Study 1, a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis indicated that levels of different components are more similar but do not converge completely when the same time frame is used. In Study 2, we found that people are more likely to consider global life circumstances (as opposed to specific events and activities) when they evaluate their CWB, regardless of the specific time frame. In both studies, the time frame did not moderate the associations between AWB and CWB and important correlates (personality, life circumstances).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.004

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luhmann, M., Hawkley, L. C., Eid, M., & Cacioppo, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Luhmann, Maike
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
431-441
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007787963
Cited by
149
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 RG999999)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG034052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
emotional well-being, cognitive well-being, time frames, living conditions, personality, measurement convergence, subjective well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review