The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time frames and the distinction between affective and cognitive well-being
Open accessAbstract
We examined whether the empirical differences between affective well-being (AWB) and cognitive well-being (CWB) might be due to (a) the use of different time frames in measures of AWB and CWB or (b) structural differences. In Study 1, a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis indicated that levels of different components are more similar but do not converge completely when the same time frame is used. In Study 2, we found that people are more likely to consider global life circumstances (as opposed to specific events and activities) when they evaluate their CWB, regardless of the specific time frame. In both studies, the time frame did not moderate the associations between AWB and CWB and important correlates (personality, life circumstances).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433 · cited 4×
“However, this effect was not replicated using two alternative measures of AWB (Watson et al., 1988).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768 · cited 4×
“During the morning lab session, participants indicated their CWB using the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., 1985) and their AWB in the past week using a battery of affective adjectives.”
MethodInfluentialConvergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116 · cited 3×
“In Study 1, we estimated the convergent and discriminant validity of different time frames in an MTMM design (Campbell & Fiske, 1959).”
MethodSubjective well-being: Three decades of progress.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 · Cited by 12,910
Diener, E. (1984) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_2 · Cited by 12,609
ФАКТОРЫ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО БЛАГОПОЛУЧИЯ ЛЮДЕЙ ПОЖИЛОГО ВОЗРАСТА
Р., Н. М., & Ю., Б. С. (2026) · CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.170.43 · Cited by 7,969
Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology
Kahneman, D. J., Diener, E. F., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 7,472
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530 · cited 1×
“Emotional stability and extraversion were assessed with 20 adjectives from Goldberg’s (1992) Big Five Inventory.”
MethodRammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 · Cited by 4,244 · cited 1×
“To keep the survey economic, emotional stability and extraversion were assessed with the respective two-item subscales of the Big Five Inventory-Short Version (BFI-S; Rammstedt & John, 2007).”
MethodFlora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.9.4.466 · Cited by 3,105 · cited 1×
“This approach is more appropriate than the more commonly used maximum likelihood estimation method when the indicators are not metric but ordinal (Flora & Curran, 2004).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–148 of 148
Affective ecologies, adaptive management and restoration efforts in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
Kraus–Polk, A., & Milligan, B. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2018.1530099 · Cited by 4
“The values, sense of place, and affective well-being of people will respond to restoration in uncertain ways (Breslow et al. 2017; Luhmann et al. 2012; Poe and Donatuto 2015; Poe, Donatuto, and Satterfield 2016).”
BackgroundThe immediate and delayed impact of multitasking on well‐being: An experience sampling study
Xu, S., & Wang, Z. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.323 · Cited by 4
Gärtner, M., Grimm, S., Aust, S., Fan, Y., von Scheve, C., & Bajbouj, M. (2017) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2017.1348467 · Cited by 4
Effects of Momentary Affect on Satisfaction Judgments
Tončić, M., & Anić, P. (2019) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000304 · Cited by 4
Values and subjective well-being in context of transition: Data from Serbia
Radović, O., Stanojević, D. Z., & Tošković, O. (2019) · Socioloski pregled · doi:10.5937/socpreg53-21692 · Cited by 7
Self-control, food choices, and affective well-being in daily life: an experience sampling study
Śleboda, P., Sobolev, M., Muench, F. J., Salvy, S., & Datta, G. D. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-025-00549-y · Cited by 3
“Affective well-being, previously defined in the literature as “frequency and intensity of positive and negative emotions and mood” (Luhmann et al., 2012), was operationalized as a measure of experienced feelings (e.g., lonely, distracted, ashamed) and dimensional affect self-reported daily, as in…”
Singh, P., Kharwar, S., & Mishra, N. (2025) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-025-10033-9 · Cited by 3
“Affective well-being has to do with the frequency of pleasant and unpleasant emotions and their effect on individuals’ ability to use available personal resources to an optimum extent (Luhmann et al., 2012; Kahneman et al., 2003).”
Understanding the relational well-being of primary school teachers in rural South Africa
Maseko, S., & Chigeza, S. (2024) · African Journal of Career Development · doi:10.4102/ajcd.v6i1.115 · Cited by 5
Areepattamannil, S., & Cairns, D. (2019) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-019-00510-5 · Cited by 3
Wellbeing and health psychology: the difficulty to measure quality of life
Femenia, S., & Lozano, J. F. (2019) · Quaderns de Psicologia · doi:10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1585 · Cited by 6
“- Cognitive well-being (CWB) represents judgments of one’s life or reflect one’s relative dominance of positive versus negative affect people make about their lives, and it is influenced by intra and inter-individual comparisons (Diener et al., 1999; Kahneman et al., 1999; Schwarz & Strack, 1999; Veenhoven, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Need‐Fulfilling Trip, Wellbeing and Desire
Kim, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.70121 · Cited by 2
Kainulainen, S. (2022) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-022-10057-9 · Cited by 7
Affect and satisfaction time dependency: An experience sampling study
Anić, P., & Tončić, M. (2024) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.763 · Cited by 2
“…component are more strongly influenced by global life circumstances, such as income, current work status and major life events (Diener et al., 1999; Luhmann et al., 2012), whereas the judgments of the affective component are influenced by the evaluation of specific events and are strongly related…”
BackgroundBriscoe, M. D., Givens, J. E., & Fitzgerald, J. B. (2025) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2025.2530915 · Cited by 2
“While related, these different measurements of subjective well-being are also empirically distinct (see Luhmann et al. 2012) and analyses of subjective well-being may therefore vary.”
Innovative approaches to analysis of job quality: factors, elements and outcomes
Signify, N., & Shvets, A. (2018) · Marketing and Management of Innovations · doi:10.21272/mmi.2018.4-03 · Cited by 2
Hastane çalışanlarının sosyal iyi olma halinin iş ve yaşam doyumu uzerindeki etkisi
Tatlı, E., & Yiğit, A. (2021) · Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.845589 · Cited by 2
Implementing Well‐Being Practices through Russian Context: HRD Perspective
Lisovskaia, A. Y. (2022) · Journal of East-West Business · doi:10.1080/10669868.2022.2047131 · Cited by 2
“This approach investigated the empirical differences between affective and cognitive well-being and found that when assessing cognitive well-being, people are more likely to consider global life circumstances (as opposed to specific events and activities) (Luhmann et al. 2012).”
BackgroundWhite, R. L. (2016) · Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) · doi:10.4226/66/5a9cd78cb0bdc · Cited by 2
“Further, positive affect and life satisfaction are two core components of mental wellbeing and were also included (Luhmann et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialWell-Being Science for Teaching and the General PublicPreprint
Tov, W., Wirtz, D., Kushlev, K., Biswas‐Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3wmsu · Cited by 2
Jovanović, V., & Šakan, D. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06829-1 · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, our findings underscore the significance of including both cognitive and affective com - ponents of SWB in research on the personality-SWB link and provide further support for the distinctiveness of the two SWB dimensions (e.g., Luhmann et al., 2012).”
Bertogg, A., Nazio, T., & Piolatto, M. (2026) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-026-03825-9 · Cited by 1
Psychological and Economic Well-Being of Those Involved in the Credit Behavior
Yanova, N. G. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23856-7_111 · Cited by 1
Ssentumbwe, V., Namuli, F., Kizito, S., Namuwonge, F., Namatovu, P., Nabunya, P., Nabayinda, J., Kiyingi, J., Brathwaite, R., Magorokosho, N. K., et al. (2024) · Global Social Welfare · doi:10.1007/s40609-024-00350-w · Cited by 1
“…experiences and two aspects of adolescents’ psychological wellbeing in Uganda: cognitive aspects (i.e., how they evaluate their life overall) (Luhmann et al., 2012) and emotional aspects (i.e., the overall positive state of their emotions, life satisfaction, sense of meaning and purpose, and…”
AFAD Çalışanlarının İşe İlişkin Duyuşsal İyilik Algısı
AYVAZOĞLU, G., Çekiç, M., & UZUNALİ, S. (2022) · Afet ve Risk Dergisi · doi:10.35341/afet.1082977 · Cited by 1
Röcke, C. (2015) · The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging · doi:10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa208 · Cited by 1
Time use and happiness: Evidence across three decadesPreprint
Han, J., & Kaiser, C. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.31235/osf.io/qjdmu · Cited by 1
Choi, J. A., 최인철, Choi, E., & Lee, M. (2016) · 한국심리학회지 사회및성격 · doi:10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.3.006
PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING OF THE SUBJECT OF FAMILY AND PROFESSIONAL INTERACTION
Kramchenkova, V., & Zhukova, L. (2020) · KELM (Knowledge Education Law Management) · doi:10.51647/kelm.2020.4.1.27
PSYCHOLOGICAL SECURITY AS A KEY CONCEPT OF FAMILY WELL-BEING IN THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF UKRAINIANS
Можаровська, Т. (2021) · Habitus · doi:10.32843/2663-5208.2021.27.24
The Case of Entrepreneurial Women in Jamaica
Esnard, T. (2022) · Palgrave studies in equity, diversity, inclusion, and indigenization in business · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04752-7_7
KILIÇ, A. C., ALPTEKİN, S. E., & Karakuş, A. (2023) · International Journal of Machine Learning · doi:10.18178/ijml.2023.13.3.1138
Leveraging Social Media Data for Unobtrusive Measurement of Academics’ Well-BeingPreprint
Müller, S. M., & Bittermann, A. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/957h8
Șușnea, I., Pecheanu, E., Cocu, A., & Simona, S. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/knscf
Petrovici, N., Pop, C., & Zbranca, R. (2024) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.1177/02762374241291479
“…1984; Grossi et al., 2006), others propose multi-dimensional models, such as a two-component structure involving cognitive and affective well-being (Luhmann et al., 2012; Martinez-Martinez et al., 2018) or a three-component model comprising life satisfaction, pleasant and unpleasant affect (Diener…”
A Control Theory Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Cognitive Wellbeing
Șușnea, I., Pecheanu, E., Cocu, A., Iacobescu, P., Tudorie, C., & Susnea, S. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14030158
Cognitive Wellbeing of School Principals: An Uncharted Territory
Wang, F. (2025) · Leadership and Policy in Schools · doi:10.1080/15700763.2025.2481500 · Cited by 2
The Emotional Climate of Academia: Exploring Social Media Data as an Indicator of Well-Being
Müller, S. M., & Bittermann, A. (2025) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-025-00902-7 · Cited by 1
“Although emotional and cognitive well-being are correlated, they are conceptually and functionally distinct (Lucas et al., 1996; Luhmann et al., 2012).”
Lee, D., & Sirgy, M. J. (2025) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04443-3_2
Filgueira, P., & Espínola, S. S. R. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7892672/v1
Network Dynamics of Life Satisfaction, Domain Satisfaction and Affective Well-Being in Adolescence
Schaefer, B., Steinmayr, R., Schmitz, M., Roth, M., Neumann, A., & Luhmann, M. (2026) · Personality Science · doi:10.1177/27000710261418545
Self-citationCohrdes, C., & Junker, S. (2026) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-026-02774-4
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and well-being
Klamer, K., & Ekstrand, C. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-28842-5.01016-4
Costa, P. J. C., Inman, R. A., & Moreira, P. (2026) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/07342829261458236
Lee, S. (2026) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2026.2679736
Hill, J. L., & Marschall, G. (2026) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70227
Metadata
- Authors
- Luhmann, M., Hawkley, L. C., Eid, M., & Cacioppo, J. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Luhmann, Maike
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431-441
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3571101
- OpenAlex
- W2007787963
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 RG999999)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG034052)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- emotional well-being, cognitive well-being, time frames, living conditions, personality, measurement convergence, subjective well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review