Cited by 127Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingAging and Gerontology Research

Up-regulating positive emotions in everyday life: Strategies, individual differences, and associations with positive emotion and well-being

Livingstone, Kimberly M., Srivastava, Sanjay·2012·Journal of Research in Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.009

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livingstone, K. M., & Srivastava, S.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Livingstone, Kimberly M.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
504-516
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131601911
Cited by
127
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
positive emotion regulation, engagement, betterment, indulgences, savoring, substance use, fantasy, personality, well-being, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review