Cited by 184Emotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

How to Bite Your Tongue Without Blowing Your Top: Implicit Evaluation of Emotion Regulation Predicts Affective Responding to Anger Provocation

Open access
Mauss, Iris B., Evers, Catharine, Wilhelm, Frank H., Gross, James J.·2006·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

People frequently have to control their emotions to function in life. However, mounting evidence suggests that deliberate emotion regulation often is costly. This presents a dilemma: Is it better to let emotions go or to pay the price of exerting costly control? In two studies, the authors explore whether emotion regulatory processes associated with implicit positive evaluation of emotion regulation might provide the benefits of successful emotion regulation without the costs. In Study 1, the authors introduce a measure of implicit evaluation of emotion regulation (ER-IAT). Study 2 examined whether this measure is associated with actual emotional responses to an anger provocation. It was found that greater ER-IAT scores were associated with lesser anger experience, fewer negative thoughts, lessened self-reported effortful emotion regulation, and an adaptive pattern of cardiovascular responding. These findings suggest that implicit positive evaluation of emotion regulation is associated with successful, automatic, and physiologically adaptive down-regulation of anger.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167205283841

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive implicit evaluation of emotion regulation is associated with less negative affect and more adaptive cardiovascular responding to an anger provocation, without greater effortful or deliberate engagement of emotion regulation strategies.

    “Using this measure, positive implicit evaluation of emotion regulation has been shown to be associated with less negative affect and more adaptive cardiovascular responding to an anger provocation, without greater effortful or deliberate engagement of emotion regulation strategies.”

    From Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal (2008) · cites this paper as Mauss, Evers, Wilhelm, & Gross, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mauss, I. B., Evers, C., Wilhelm, F. H., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2006-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
589-602
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2034545593
Cited by
184
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 58147)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotion regulation, Implicit Association Test, anger, negative automatic thoughts
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anger, Arousal, Awareness, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Individuality, Inhibition, Psychological, Internal-External Control, Male, Motivation, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Psychophysiology, Repression, Psychology, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Expressed Emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review