Cited by 547Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchBehavioral Health and InterventionsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies.

Oettingen, Gabriele, Mayer, Doris·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Two forms of thinking about the future are distinguished: expectations versus fantasies. Positive expectations (judging a desired future as likely) predicted high effort and successful performance, but the reverse was true for positive fantasies (experiencing one's thoughts and mental images about a desired future positively). Participants were graduates looking for a job (Study 1), students with a crush on a peer of the opposite sex (Study 2), undergraduates anticipating an exam (Study 3), and patients undergoing hip-replacement surgery (Study 4). Effort and performance were measured weeks or months (up to 2 years) after expectations and fantasies had been assessed. Implications for the self-regulation of effort and performance are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1198

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementation intentions and mental contrasting are particularly useful.

    “particularly useful are for example implementation intentions and mental contrasting (Gollwitzer & Brandstätter, 1997;Oettingen & Mayer, 2002).”

    From Understanding and Treating Procrastination: A Review of a Common Self-Regulatory Failure (2014) · cites this paper as Oettingen & Mayer, 2002

  • Thinking only about positive future outcomes decreases goal-relevant efforts and the likelihood of goal achievement.

    “Several studies by Oettingen and colleagues found that thinking only about positive future outcomes decreases goal-relevant efforts, as well as the likelihood of goal achievement (e.g., Oettingen and Mayer, 2002; Kappes H. B. et al., 2012; Oettingen et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2002-11
Volume
83
Issue
5
Pages
1198-1212
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2156231772
Cited by
547
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 37
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
expectations, fantasy, motivation, effort, performance, self-regulation, mental imagery, job search, romantic relationships, test anxiety, total hip arthroplasty
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adult, Fantasy, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Love, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review