Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120

Johnson, John A.·2014·Journal of Research in Personality
DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Ali, 2011, Impact of personality traits on leadership styles of secondary school teachers, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3, 610
  2. Ashton, 1973, In response to Jackson’s challenge: The comparative validity of personality scales constructed by the external (empirical) strategy and scales developed intuitively by experts, novices, and laymen, Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 1, 10.1016/0092-6566(73)90028-7 · DOI
  3. Briggs, 1986, The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales, Journal of Personality, 54, 106, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Clifton, 2011, Self-reported personality variability across the social network is associated with interpersonal dysfunction, Journal of Personality, 79, 359, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00686.x · DOI
  5. Conway, 2009, Workplace helping: Interactive effects of personality and momentary positive affect, Human Performance, 22, 321, 10.1080/08959280903120279 · DOI
  6. Craske, 2009, Does neuroticism in adolescents moderate contextual and explicit threat cue modulation of the startle reflex?, Biological Psychiatry, 65, 220, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07.020 · DOI
  7. Edmonds, 2013, Personality stability from childhood to midlife: Relating teachers’ assessments in elementary school to observer- and self-ratings 40 years later, Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 505, 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.003 · DOI
  8. Fletcher, 2008, Trait competitiveness as a composite variable: Linkages with facets of the big-five, Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 312, 10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.020 · DOI
  9. Goldberg, 1972, Parameters of personality inventory construction and utilization: A comparison of prediction strategies and tactics, Multivariate Behavioral Research Monograph, 7
  10. Goldberg, 1999, A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models, Vol. 7, 7
  11. Goldberg, 2008, The Eugene-Springfield community sample: Information available from the research participants, ORI Technical Report, 48
  12. Griffin, 2004, Why openness to experience is not a good predictor of job performance, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 243, 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.278_1.x · DOI
  13. Hagger-Johnson, 2007, Conscientiousness facets and health behaviors: A latent variable modeling approach, Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1235, 10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.014 · DOI
  14. Hauner, 2008, Neuroticism and introversion are associated with salivary cortisol patterns in adolescents, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33, 1344, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.07.011 · DOI
  15. Hogan, 1988, The meaning of personality test scores, American Psychologist, 43, 621, 10.1037/0003-066X.43.8.621 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.43.8.621 · Paper page
  16. Johnson, 2005, Ascertaining the validity of web-based personality inventories, Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 103, 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Johnson, J. A. (2009, July). Calibrating personality self-report scores to acquaintance ratings. Poster presented at the first stand-alone conference of the Association for Research in Personality, Evanston, IL.
  18. Lewis, 2010, The relationship between anxiety sensitivity and latent symptoms of emotional problems: A structural equation modeling approach, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 761, 10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.001 · DOI
  19. Li, Y. -M., Lai, C. -Y., & Kao, C. -P. (2008). Incorporate personality trait with support vector machine to acquire quality matching of personnel recruitment. In 4th Proc. international conference on business and information 2008 (BAI 2008) (pp. 1–11). CD-ROM:B2-315.
  20. Lo, 2005, Fear and greed in financial markets: A clinical study of day-traders, American Economic Review, 95, 352, 10.1257/000282805774670095 · DOI · Paper page
  21. McAdams, 2009, Facets of personality and drinking in first-year college students, Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 207, 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.028 · DOI
  22. McDonald, 2006, Is ostracism a strong situation? The influence of personality in reactions to rejection, Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 614, 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.008 · DOI
  23. Miller, 2012, An examination of the psychopathic personality inventory’s nomological network: A meta-analytic review, Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 305, 10.1037/a0024567 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mosley, 2010, Personality and character selection in World of Warcraft, McNair Scholars Research Journal, 6
  25. Mõttus, 2006, Toward more readable Big Five personality inventories, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 149, 10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.149 · DOI
  26. Ogot, 2006, The Five-Factor Model personality assessment for improved student design team performance, European Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 517, 10.1080/03043790600797335 · doi:10.1080/03043790600797335
  27. Rammstedt, 2010, The measurement equivalence of Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education, Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 53, 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.005 · DOI
  28. Rorer, 1965, The great response style myth, Psychological Bulletin, 63, 129, 10.1037/h0021888 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Saati, B., Salem, M., & Brinkman, W. -P. (2005). Towards customized user interface skins: investigating user personality and skin colour. In Proceedings of HCI 2005 (Vol. 2, pp. 89–93). <http://www.academia.edu/341112/Towards_Customized_User_Interface_Skins_Investigating_User_Personality_and_Skin_Colour> Retrieved.
  30. Saucier, 1994, Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers, Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506, 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Schriesheim, 1981, Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1101, 10.1177/001316448104100420 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sibley, 2012, The Mini-IPIP6: Item Response Theory analysis of a short measure of the big-six factors of personality in New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 41, 21
  33. Sibley, 2011, The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 142
  34. Siddiqui, 2011, Personality influences mobile phone usage, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3, 554
  35. Soto, 2008, The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718, 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sutton, 2011, The relationships of personality and cognitive styles with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35, 381, 10.1007/s10608-010-9336-9 · DOI
  37. Trippe, D. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2003, April). Item response theory analysis of the IPIP big-five scales. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of the society for industrial and organizational psychology, Orlando, FL. · doi:10.1037/e518712013-374
  38. van den Berg, 2008, Myopia and personality: The genes in myopia (GEM) personality study, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 49, 882, 10.1167/iovs.07-0930 · doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0930
  39. Wallace, 2006, A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance, Personnel Psychology, 59, 529, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00046.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. Whalen, 2007, A psychological profile of defender personality traits, Journal of Computers, 2, 84, 10.4304/jcp.2.2.84-93 · DOI
  41. Witt, 2009, Using existing self-report inventories to measure the psychopathic personality traits of Fearless Dominance and Impulsive Antisociality, Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1006, 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.06.010 · DOI

Cited by

See all 537

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
51
Pages
78-89
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003
OpenAlex
W2046759284
Cited by
537
References
3
FWCI
21.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003
The paper
Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.