Cited by 64Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and Psychology

I'm lonely, can't you tell? Convergent validity of self- and informant ratings of loneliness

Luhmann, Maike, Bohn, Johannes, Holtmann, Jana, Koch, Tobias, Eid, Michael·2016·Journal of Research in Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.02.002

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luhmann, M., Bohn, J., Holtmann, J., Koch, T., & Eid, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Corresponding author
Luhmann, Maike
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
61
Pages
50-60
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2272397698
Cited by
61
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
loneliness, life satisfaction, convergent validity, self-ratings, informant ratings, romantic partners, parents, friends, young adults, multitrait-multimethod analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review