Cited by 1,169Personality Traits and PsychologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization

Back, Mitja D., Stopfer, Juliane M., Vazire, Simine, Gaddis, Sam, Schmukle, Stefan C., Egloff, Boris, Gosling, Samuel D.·2010·Psychological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797609360756

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observers were able to accurately infer the personality characteristics of FB users, suggesting that participants were expressing and communicating real personality rather than promoting idealized versions of themselves.

    “Observers were able to accurately infer the personality characteristics of the FB users in the study, suggesting that participants were expressing and communicating real personality rather than promoting idealized versions of themselves (Back et al., 2010).”

    From Why do people use Facebook? (2012) · cites this paper as Back et al., 2010

  • Previous research has suggested populations for online studies and Facebook are quite representative.

    “Furthermore, previous research has suggested populations for online studies and Facebook are quite representative [23], [24].”
  • Human observers can rely on a much broader array of contextual and semantic cues when inferring other people's personalities from their writing and/or websites.

    “By contrast, human observers can rely on a much broader array of contextual and semantic cues when inferring other people's personalities from their writing and/or websites (e.g., Back et al., 2010; Marcus, Machilek, & Schutz, 2006; Vazire & Gosling 2004).”
  • The results converge with other recent findings suggesting that people do not present themselves in an idealized and overly positive way online, and maintain online identities that reflect the way they genuinely see themselves and are seen by others.

    “The results converge with other recent findings suggesting that, contrary to popular wisdom, people do not present themselves in an idealized and overly positive way online (Turkle, 1997), and maintain online identities that reflect the way they genuinely see themselves and are seen by others (Back et al., 2010; Vazire & Gosling, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Back, Mitja D.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-01-29
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
372-374
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2137351972
Cited by
1,169
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 70
FWCI
72.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
Facebook profiles, personality, self-presentation, self-idealization, social media, self-concept, online self-presentation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Communication, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Motivation, Personality, Self Concept, Self Disclosure, Social Behavior, Social Support, Truth Disclosure, United States, Internet, Feedback, Psychological, Friends, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review