CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 54Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of a mindset intervention

Burgoyne, Alexander P., Hambrick, David Z., Moser, Jason S., Burt, S. Alexandra·2018·Journal of Research in Personality
DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.004

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Aditomo, 2015, Students’ response to academic setback: 'Growth Mindset' as a buffer against demotivation, International Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 198, 10.17583/ijep.2015.1482 · DOI
  2. Cronbach, 1955, Construct validity in psychological tests, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281, 10.1037/h0040957 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Dommett, 2013, The impact of participation in a neuroscience course on motivational measures and academic performance, Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 122, 10.1016/j.tine.2013.05.002 · DOI
  4. Dweck, 1995, Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives, Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267, 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 · DOI
  5. Dweck, 1988, A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality, Psychological Review, 95, 256, 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Eskreis-Winkler, 2014, The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 36, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Findley, 1983, Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 419, 10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.419 · DOI
  8. Grant, 2003, Clarifying achievement goals and their impact, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541, 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541 · DOI
  9. Paunesku, 2015, Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement, Psychological Science, 26, 784, 10.1177/0956797615571017 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Robins, 2002, Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change, Self and Identity, 1, 313, 10.1080/15298860290106805 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Rotter, 1966, Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1, 10.1037/h0092976 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Shedlosky-Shoemaker, 2015, Who leaves, who stays? Psychological predictors of undergraduate chemistry students’ persistence, Journal of Chemical Education, 92, 408, 10.1021/ed500571j · DOI
  13. Sriram, 2014, Rethinking intelligence: The role of mindset in promoting success for academically high-risk students, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15, 515, 10.2190/CS.15.4.c · DOI
  14. Trice, 1985, An academic locus of control scale for college students, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1043, 10.2466/pms.1985.61.3f.1043 · DOI
  15. Tucker-Drob, 2016, Genetically-mediated associations between measures of childhood character and academic achievement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 790, 10.1037/pspp0000098 · DOI
  16. Vallerand, 1997, Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161, 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Weiner, 1985, An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion, Psychological Review, 92, 548, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Yeager, 2012, Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed, Educational Psychologist, 47, 302, 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Burgoyne, A. P., Hambrick, D. Z., Moser, J. S., & Burt, S. A.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Burgoyne, Alexander P.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
77
Pages
21-30
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.004
OpenAlex
W2891233766
Cited by
54
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Genetics and Human Agency
  • John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
growth mindset, mindset intervention, online intervention, locus of control, grit, self-determination, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, cognitive ability, intelligence beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review