Cited by 702Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school.

Open access
Yeager, David S., Romero, Carissa, Paunesku, Dave, Hulleman, Christopher S., Schneider, Barbara, Hinojosa, Cintia, Lee, Hae Yeon, O'Brien, Joseph +6 more·2016·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

=3,676). Although the intervention could still be improved even further, the current research provides a model for how to improve and scale interventions that begin to address pressing educational problems. It also provides insight into how to teach a growth mindset more effectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/edu0000098

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In preparing the intervention to be scalable, the authors revised past growth mindset interventions to focus on the perspectives, concerns and reading levels of ninth-grade students in the United States, through an intensive research and development process that involved interviews, focus groups and randomized pilot experiments with thousands of adolescents.

    “In preparing the intervention to be scalable, we revised past growth mindset interventions to focus on the perspectives, concerns and reading levels of ninth-grade students in the United States, through an intensive research and development process that involved interviews, focus groups and randomized pilot experiments with thousands of adolescents13.”

    From A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement (2019) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Pilot’s design-methodology section describes one-on-one meetings, small-group discussions, and revisions based on ninth-graders’ feedback about confusing material; the Abstract reports iterative randomized A/B experiments with about 3,000 participants. But the Pilot’s Method says the rapid A/B experiments primarily used college-aged and older adults, with a final experiment involving high school students. It therefore does not support describing the randomized pilot experiments as involving thousands of adolescents, and it does not explicitly say the revisions targeted reading levels. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindset is a more important predictor of success for low-income students than for their high-income peers.

    “The observation that mindset is a more important predictor of success for low-income students than for their high-income peers is novel, although it is consistent with prior research, which has found that a fixed mindset is more debilitating (and a growth mindset is more protective) when individuals must overcome significant barriers to succeed (13, 14).”

    From Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

    The citation supports the sentence’s claim about prior research, not its expressly novel low-income versus high-income observation. The Focus of the Present Investigation reports greater GPA benefits from a growth-mindset intervention for lower-achieving students, and Study 2’s Results find the same pattern. Those passages do not establish that fixed mindset is more debilitating across the broader range of significant barriers described in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Growth mindset plays a causal role in achievement, as shown by prior field experiments including two blinded, randomized, controlled studies conducted with over 1,500 participants each.

    “Additionally, a number of field experiments have now shown that growth mindset plays a causal role in achievement.”

    From Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Focus of the Present Investigation describes a double-blind, randomized study of more than 1,500 high-school students that improved grades among lower achievers. This paper’s Study 2 Methods and Results report a separate randomized experiment with 3,676 students and grade benefits concentrated among lower achievers. The copy says researchers coding courses were blind to condition, but does not establish that Study 2 was a blinded trial in the same sense as the prior study; the claim’s description of two blinded studies is therefore not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A growth mindset of intelligence intervention addresses adolescents' beliefs about the nature of intelligence, leading them to see intellectual abilities as capable of growth in response to dedicated effort, trying new strategies and seeking help.

    “The specific intervention evaluated here—a growth mindset of intelligence intervention—addresses the beliefs of adolescents about the nature of intelligence, leading students to see intellectual abilities not as fixed but as capable of growth in response to dedicated effort, trying new strategies and seeking help when appropriate12–16.”
  • Previous randomized evaluations, including a pre-registered replication, found that online growth mindset interventions improved grades for lower-achieving secondary students.

    “Nonetheless, previous randomized evaluations, including a pre-registered replication, found that online growth mindset interventions improved grades for the targeted group of students in secondary education who previously showed lower achievement13,16,18.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kohavi R Longbotham R 2015 Online controlled experiments and A/B tests Sammut C Webb G Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining NY, NY Springer
  2. McCannon CJ Schall MW Perla RJ 2008 Planning for Scale: A Guide for Designing Large-Scale Improvement Initiatives IHI Innovation Series white paper Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O'Brien, J., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Greene, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • ICF International (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2016-04
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
374-391
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2508466548
Cited by
691
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 13
FWCI
93.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Spencer Foundation
  • William T. Grant Foundation
  • Bezos Foundation
  • Houston Endowment
  • Character Lab
  • Stanford University
  • Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
design thinking, growth mindset, psychological intervention, transition to high school, scaling up interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review