Cited by 36Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild Abuse and Trauma

A history of sexual, emotional, or physical abuse predicts adjustment during opioid maintenance treatment

Branstetter, Steven A., Bower, Emily H., Kamien, Jonathan, Amass, Leslie·2008·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

This study examined how having a history of sexual, physical, or emotional abuse is related to overall functioning as assessed by the Addiction Severity Index during short-term opioid maintenance treatment with either buprenorphine/naloxone or methadone. Furthermore, the relation between abuse history and overall functioning by sex was explored. Participants (N = 268) were opioid-dependent adults entering an outpatient randomized clinical trial with buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone. Latent growth modeling indicated that females with an abuse history entered treatment with more problems in the psychiatric and family domains as compared with females without an abuse history. Over the course of treatment, a history of abuse predicted problems in the psychiatric and alcohol domains. Furthermore, a history of abuse predicted slower recovery times and less recovery overall for females in some domains. Males with an abuse history entered treatment with more severe psychiatric and family problems as compared with males with no history of abuse. Victims of abuse may present to substance abuse treatment with weaknesses in the areas of family relations, psychiatric status, and alcohol use. The nature of these problems and their trajectory over time differed by sex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.03.009

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Branstetter, S. A., Bower, E. H., Kamien, J., & Amass, L.
Affiliations
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
208-214
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030916554
Cited by
36
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da011160-02)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA11160)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
childhood abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse, opioid use disorder, opioid maintenance treatment, buprenorphine/naloxone, methadone, Addiction Severity Index, treatment outcomes, sex differences, mental illness, family problems, alcohol consumption, recovery trajectories
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Opioid, Buprenorphine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heroin Dependence, Humans, Male, Methadone, Middle Aged, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Sex Offenses, Social Adjustment, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Domestic Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review