The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The potential role(s) of writing in second language development
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Task-based Language Learning and Teaching
Ellis, R. (2003) · Asian Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.65961/ajelt-2003-1-009 · Cited by 3,601
SWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S. (1995) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · Cited by 1,407
Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement
Laufer, B. (2001) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.1 · Cited by 1,334 · cited 2×
“Focus on form refers to ‘‘an occasional shift of attention to linguistic code features – by the teacher and/or one or more students’’ (Long & Robinson, 1998, p. 23). Crucially, it also includes a concurrent, or nearly concurrent, focus on meaning. In a precursor argument to the focus on form perspective, Swain (1985)…”
BackgroundComplexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amp048 · Cited by 863
Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164 · Cited by 819 · cited 1×
“Within vocabulary research, the Involvement Load Hypothesis suggests that certain task characteristics are more likely to promote lexical acquisition than others (Hulstijn & Laufer, 2001; Laufer & Hulstijn, 2001).”
BackgroundRECEPTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY LEARNING: The Effects of Reading and Writing on Word Knowledge
Webb, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050023 · Cited by 527 · cited 1×
“Webb (2005) makes similar arguments for the comparison of reading and writing tasks, that is, that equalizing time on these tasks detracts from their authenticity.”
BackgroundCognitive underpinnings of focus on form
Doughty, C. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.010 · Cited by 523
THE EFFECTS OF PLANNING ON FLUENCY, COMPLEXITY, AND ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE NARRATIVE WRITING
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104261034 · Cited by 453
Error correction, revision, and learning
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-P. (2008) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003 · Cited by 414
Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00046-7 · Cited by 383
Cited by
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011 · Cited by 278
Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs
Abrams, Z. I. (2019) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44681 · Cited by 124
10. A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.11rou · Cited by 81
Vyatkina, N., Hirschmann, H., & Golcher, F. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.006 · Cited by 70
The Intersection between SLA and Feedback Research
Bitchener, J. (2019) · Feedback in Second Language Writing · doi:10.1017/9781108635547.007 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-331
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039509588
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 161.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007
- The paper
- Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
