Cited by 21Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Should we tailor the clinical management of erectile dysfunction according to different ages?

Capogrosso, Paolo, Ventimiglia, Eugenio, Boeri, Luca, Pozzi, Edoardo, Chierigo, Francesco, Schifano, Nicolò, Abbate, Costantino, Matloob, Rayan +2 more·2019·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The impact of erectile dysfunction (ED) on patients' sexual satisfaction and mood profile could differ across different ages. AIM: To investigate the relationship between erectile function (EF), sexual satisfaction, and mood status among patients seeking medical help for ED. METHODS: Data from 765 patients presenting at a single center for ED were analyzed. Patients were categorized as young (≤50 years), middle-aged (>50 and ≤65 years), and old (>65 years) individuals and completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Beck's Inventory for Depression (BDI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The IIEF overall satisfaction and intercourse satisfaction domain scores and the BDI score were used to investigate sexual life satisfaction and depressive symptoms (defined as BDI > 11) across ages and according to ED severity. Linear and logistic regression analyses assessed the relationship between satisfaction scores and the risk of depressive symptoms with age and EF. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) age at first assessment for ED was 50 (38, 59) years. Compared with older men, young and middle-aged patients showed significantly higher IIEF-OS and IIEF- Intercourse Satisfaction scores for increasing IIEF-EF scores. Older men showed no difference in terms of satisfaction scores for mild ED and normal EF status. At linear regression analysis, both IIEF-EF and age were significantly associated with sexual satisfaction (all P < .0001). The interaction term between age and EF was also significant, suggesting that the older the patients, the higher the feeling of sexual satisfaction for the same EF status (P = .004). Overall, 25% of patients reported depressive symptoms. Logistic regression analysis showed a 40% risk of depressive symptoms for patients <45 years with severe ED compared to a risk <20% for a man >65 years of age with the same EF status. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Treating older patients with mild ED may not lead to a further improvement in sexual satisfaction as compared with younger patients with the same ED severity. Younger ED patients suffer more from depressive symptoms compared with older men, regardless of ED severity, thus supporting the need for a comprehensive psychological counseling. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The single-center design and the lack of the assessment of the impact of ED treatment are the main limits. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical management of ED should be tailored according to different ages: younger patients deserve to be investigated and eventually treated for depressive symptoms. Older patients should be counseled for treatment when a sexual satisfaction improvement is expected. Capogrosso P, Ventimiglia E, Boeri L, et al. Should We Tailor the Clinical Management of Erectile Dysfunction According to Different Ages? J Sex Med 2019;16:999-1004.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.405

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capogrosso, P., Ventimiglia, E., Boeri, L., Pozzi, E., Chierigo, F., Schifano, N., Abbate, C., Matloob, R., Montorsi, F., & Salonia, A.
Affiliations
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
Corresponding author
Salonia, Andrea
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2019-04-30
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
999-1004
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2943164686
Cited by
21
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, age differences, sexual satisfaction, depressive symptoms, erectile function, International Index of Erectile Function, Beck Depression Inventory, psychological counseling, ED severity, older men, young men, tailored treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coitus, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Orgasm, Penile Erection, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review