Cited by 1,113Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

On the Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory

Richter, Paul, Werner, Joachim, Heerlein, Andrés, Kraus, Alfred, Sauer, Heinrich·1998·Psychopathology

Abstract

The present review discusses validity aspects of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) on the basis of meta-analyses of studies on the psychometric properties. Shortcomings of the BDI are its high item difficulty, lack of representative norms, and thus doubtful objectivity of interpretation, controversial factorial validity, instability of scores over short time intervals (over the course of 1 day), and poor discriminant validity against anxiety. Advantages of the inventory are its high internal consistency, high content validity, validity in differentiating between depressed and nondepressed subjects, sensitivity to change, and international propagation. The present paper outlines agreements and contradictions between the various studies on the BDI and discusses the potential factors (composition of the subject sample, statistical procedures, point in time of measurement) accounting for the variance in their results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000066239

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richter, P., Werner, J., Heerlein, A., Kraus, A., & Sauer, H.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Venue
Psychopathology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1998
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
160-168
ISSN
  • 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-033X
OpenAlex
W2058051739
Cited by
1,113
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 50
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Beck Depression Inventory, depression assessment, psychometric validity, self-report questionnaire, factorial validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, content validity, sensitivity to change, anxiety, item difficulty, norms
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Humans, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review