Cited by 197Evolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy and History of ScienceEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications

Degeneracy: A design principle for achieving robustness and evolvability

Open access
Whitacre, James, Bender, Axel·2010·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

Robustness, the insensitivity of some of a biological system's functionalities to a set of distinct conditions, is intimately linked to fitness. Recent studies suggest that it may also play a vital role in enabling the evolution of species. Increasing robustness, so is proposed, can lead to the emergence of evolvability if evolution proceeds over a neutral network that extends far throughout the fitness landscape. Here, we show that the design principles used to achieve robustness dramatically influence whether robustness leads to evolvability. In simulation experiments, we find that purely redundant systems have remarkably low evolvability while degenerate, i.e. partially redundant, systems tend to be orders of magnitude more evolvable. Surprisingly, the magnitude of observed variation in evolvability can neither be explained by differences in the size nor the topology of the neutral networks. This suggests that degeneracy, a ubiquitous characteristic in biological systems, may be an important enabler of natural evolution. More generally, our study provides valuable new clues about the origin of innovations in complex adaptive systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.008

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study in S. cerevisiae indicated that anticipatory gene regulatory patterns can evolve under cycling salt and oxidative stress conditions on a laboratory time scale within 300 generations, and that cross-stress protection against salt and oxidative stress is strikingly asymmetrical, with oxidative stress protecting against salt stress but not vice versa.

    “In fact, a recent study in S. cerevisiae indicated that anticipatory gene regulatory patterns can evolve under cycling salt and oxidative stress conditions on a laboratory time scale within 300 generations and that cross-stress protection against salt and oxidative stress is strikingly asymmetrical, with oxidative stress protecting against salt stress but not vice versa[120].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28][28] S. Wright, "The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution," Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics, vol. 1, pp. 356-366, 1932. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitacre, J., & Bender, A.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Defence Science and Technology Group (AU)
Corresponding author
Whitacre, James
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
263
Issue
1
Pages
143-153
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055308071
Cited by
197
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
degeneracy, robustness, evolvability, neutral networks, fitness landscape, redundancy, design principles, complex adaptive systems, evolution
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Computer Simulation, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Software, Models, Statistical, Neural Networks, Computer, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review