Cited by 180Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurology and Historical StudiesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Historical pitfalls and new directions in the neuroscience of emotion

Open access
Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Satpute, Ajay B.·2019·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

In this article, we offer a brief history summarizing the last century of neuroscientific study of emotion, highlighting dominant themes that run through various schools of thought. We then summarize the current state of the field, followed by six key points for scientific progress that are inspired by a multi-level constructivist theory of emotion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.045

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accumulating cognitive-affective neuroscience evidence from almost every domain of measurement is strongly inconsistent with the classical view of emotion and its implications.

    “However, accumulating cognitive-affective neuroscience evidence from almost every domain of measurement is strongly inconsistent with this classical view of emotion and its implications (Barrett and Lida, submitted for publication).[47][48][49][50][51]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Anderson ML 2014 After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain Cambridge MA MIT Press
  2. Bliss-Moreau, Lavenex, & Amaral (under review). Fear learning persists following early Amygdala damage in nonhuman primates Manuscript under review
  3. Clark-Polner E Wager TD Satpute AB Barrett LF 2016b The brain basis of affect, emotion, and emotion regulation: Current issues Lewis M Haviland-Jones J Barrett LF Handbook of emotions 4 New York, NY The Guilford Press
  4. Clore GL Ortony A 2008 Appraisal theories: How cognition shapes affect into emotion Lewis M Haviland-Jones JM Barrett LF Handbook of emotions 3 628 642 New York, NY Guilford Press
  5. Lindquist KA Wager TD Kober H Bliss-Moreau E Barrett LF 2012 The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 3 121 143 22617651 PMC4329228
  6. Okon-Singer H Stout DM Stockbridge MD Gamer M Fox AS Shackman AJ (in press). The interplay of emotion and cognition Fox AS Lapate RC Shackman AJ Davidson RJ The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions 2 New York Oxford University Press
  7. Osgood CE Suci GJ Tannenbaum PH 1957 The measurement of meaning 47 Urbana University of Illinois Press
  8. Tomkins S 1962 Affect imagery consciousness: Volume i: The positive affects New York, NY Springer Publishing
  9. Tomkins S 1963 Affect imagery consciousness: Volume ii: The negative affects New York, NY Springer Publishing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Pomona College (US)
Corresponding author
Barrett, Lisa Feldman
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
693
Pages
9-18
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2737549857
Cited by
180
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes on Aging (AG030311)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA193632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
affective neuroscience, history of emotion research, multilevel theory
MeSH terms
Emotions, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neurosciences, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review