Cited by 49Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Practice and Education Studies

Welfare considerations: Salivary cortisol concentrations on frequency of therapy dog visits in an outpatient hospital setting: A pilot study

Open access
Clark, Stephanie D., Smidt, Jessica M., Bauer, Brent A.·2019·Journal of Veterinary Behavior

Abstract

The animal-assisted therapy field is exponentially growing under the lack of science-based evidence of potential risks to the animals involved. Even though to become a therapy dog, the dog must pass an evaluation, most evaluations do not take into account disposition. Thus, a dog could become certified as a therapy dog but still become uncomfortable in stressful situations. Therefore, it is important to understand the magnitude of stress therapy dogs may experience during visits and if the amount of visits per month affects the level of stress. In this 4 × 4 Latin square-designed pilot study, four therapy dog teams were randomly assigned to an outpatient nursing unit at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The therapy dog teams were then randomly assigned to the order of the four treatments. The treatments include: treatment A, two visits a week over the course of four weeks; treatment B, one visit a week over the course of four weeks; treatment C, two visits over the course of four weeks; treatment D, one visit over the course of four weeks. Interestingly, this study noted a dog × time effect. Dog 3, the youngest in the study, had the highest postsalivary cortisol for treatment A, C, and D. When comparing pre and postsalivary cortisol concentrations, only treatment A was significantly different ( P = 0.04). This novel study was the first to assess the frequency of therapy dog visits’ effect on therapy dog salivary cortisol. In comparing baseline to postvisit salivary cortisol concentration, treatment A had a significant reduction in cortisol postvisit. These data suggest that the more frequently, two visits a week, the therapy dog visits, the lower the cortisol concentrations will be. To further evaluate the welfare and potential state of stress in therapy dogs, researchers need to collect additional biological, objective parameters and have visits uniformed and recorded for behavioral analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.002

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dogs participating in AAT may be positively affected in carefully designed interventions when comparing their state before and after the session.

    “Regarding animal welfare, dogs participating in AAT may be even positively affected in interventions that are carefully designed when comparing their state before and after the session [65,66].”

    From Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adolescents with eating disorders: A study protocol for a pilot controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Results and Conclusion (pages unavailable) report lower postvisit cortisol than baseline for dogs visiting twice weekly, consistent with a possible benefit under that visit schedule. But the Conclusion cautions that cortisol alone cannot establish good welfare, and the study does not show that carefully designed interventions generally affect dogs positively. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Venable, E.B., Bland, S.D., Holscher, H.D., Swanson, K.S., 2016. Effects of air travel on the canine microbiome: a pilot study. Int. J. Vet. Health Sci. Res. 4 (6), 132e139.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, S. D., Smidt, J. M., & Bauer, B. A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Stephanie D.
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
30
Pages
88-91
ISSN
1558-7878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904335245
Cited by
49
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Veterinary Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL1-TR002377)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002377)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Keywords
therapy dogs, animal-assisted therapy, salivary cortisol, canine stress, visit frequency, dog welfare, stress biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review