Cited by 63Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

A study on 107 patients with acute mesenteric ischemia over 30 years

Open access
Alhan, Etem, Usta, Arif, Çekiç, Arif, Saglam, Kutay, Türkyılmaz, Serdar, Cinel, Akif·2012·International Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life threatening cause of acute abdomen. The purpose of this study is to define risk factors that predict the adverse outcome of AMI and to present our experience in the last 30 years. Hospital records and clinical data of 107 patients undergoing surgical intervention for AMI during the last 30 year period were reviewed and clinical outcomes as well as factors influencing mortality were analyzed. Mesenteric arterial thrombosis, arterial embolism and nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) were the cause of AMI in 68 (63.6%), 28 (26%), and 11 patients (10.2%), respectively. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (90.6%). Peritonitis was observed in 96 patients (89.7%) and 24 patients (22.4%) were in shock. Abdominal ultrasonography was performed in 46 patients (42%), abdominal CT angiography in 36 patients (33%) and mesenteric angiography in 12 patients (10.5%). All patients were operated and 11 (10%) patients underwent a second-look operation. Bowel resection was necessary in 101 patients (93.4%) during the initial operation and in seven patients (6.5%) during the second-look operation. The hospital mortality was 55.1%. Mortality was mainly due to multiorgan failure (43%). Diabetes mellitus, use of digoxine and antiplatelet drugs, duration of the symptoms until before surgery, existence of shock, low levels of the pH and bicarbonate and re-laparotomy were found to be negative predictors of the perioperative mortality. The use of total parenteral nutrition and CT angiography was found to be a protective factor against mortality. A high index of suspicion with prompt diagnostic evaluation with CT angiography may reduce time prior to surgical intervention which may lead to improved patient survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.07.011

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bowel resection alone can be life saving in 30% of patients with occlusive AMI.

    “Revascularization is required in more than 70% of patients with occlusive AMI while bowel resection alone can be life saving in 30% of patients with occlusive AMI[97].”

    From Ischemic bowel disease in 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says no patients underwent revascularization, and the Results report bowel resection in 101 of 107 patients, supporting the point that patients can survive without revascularization. The paper does not report 30% survival after resection alone in occlusive AMI; it reports 55.1% mortality across its entire cohort, which also included nonocclusive cases. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Revascularization is required in more than 70% of patients with occlusive AMI.

    “Revascularization is required in more than 70% of patients with occlusive AMI while bowel resection alone can be life saving in 30% of patients with occlusive AMI[97].”

    From Ischemic bowel disease in 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Discussion describes restoring blood flow as a basis of surgical management, but calls revascularization controversial and reports that none of the study’s patients underwent it. It gives no estimate that more than 70% of patients with occlusive AMI require revascularization. The Results report bowel resections and overall survival, but do not establish the citing sentence’s 30% figure for occlusive AMI. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mesenteric venous thrombosis is considered a common cause of venous mesenteric ischemia that might lead to advanced bowel necrosis.

    “In addition, mesenteric venous thrombosis Is considered a common cause of venous mesenteric ischemia that might lead to advanced bowel necrosis [4, 5].”

    From Outcome of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia in Patients with COVID 19 Infection Our Experience at Royal Medical Services (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction (page not provided) lists mesenteric venous thrombosis as a cause of acute mesenteric ischemia. It does not call it a common cause. The Discussion reports bowel necrosis in the study’s patients but does not link those cases specifically to venous thrombosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Acute mesenteric ischemia is a life-threatening surgical emergency resulting from abrupt occlusion of mesenteric vessels caused by atherosclerotic disease, arterial thromboembolism and dissection.

    “Acute Mesenteric ischemia is a life threatening surgical emergency resulting from abrupt occlusion of mesenteric vessels caused by atherosclerotic disease, arterial thromboembolism and dissection.”

    From Outcome of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia in Patients with COVID 19 Infection Our Experience at Royal Medical Services (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes acute mesenteric ischemia as life-threatening and requiring early surgical intervention, and identifies arterial thrombosis and embolism as causes. It does not identify atherosclerotic disease or dissection as causes. It also describes nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, so the claim that the condition results from vessel occlusion is too broad. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The typical presentation in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia is severe abdominal pain out of proportion to physical signs along with bowel emptying, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea that might progress into peritonitis and bowel perforation.

    “The typical presentation in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia is severe abdominal pain that is out of proportion of physical signs along with bowel emptying, nausea, vomitimg and Diarrhea that might progress into peritonitis and bowel perforation [1, 2, 4, 5].”

    From Outcome of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia in Patients with COVID 19 Infection Our Experience at Royal Medical Services (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vollmar B, Menger MD. Intestinal ischemiaereperfusion: microcirculatory pathology and functional consequences. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011;396:13e29.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alhan, E., Usta, A., Çekiç, A., Saglam, K., Türkyılmaz, S., & Cinel, A.
Affiliations
Karadeniz Technical University (TR)
Corresponding author
Alhan, Etem
Venue
International Journal of Surgery
Published
2012
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
510-513
ISSN
  • 1743-9159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9191
OpenAlex
W2052727055
Cited by
63
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Keywords
acute mesenteric ischemia, risk factors, mortality, nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, arterial embolism, bowel resection, second-look surgery, multiple organ failure, CT angiography, total parenteral nutrition, antiplatelet agents, digoxin, diabetes mellitus, shock, peritonitis, abdominal ultrasound, mesenteric angiography
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Intestines, Ischemia, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Vascular Diseases, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review