Cited by 56Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Learning hierarchical time series data augmentation invariances via contrastive supervision for human activity recognition

Cheng, Dongzhou, Zhang, Lei, Bu, Can, Wu, Hao, Song, Aiguo·2023·Knowledge-Based Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110789

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, D., Zhang, L., Bu, C., Wu, H., & Song, A.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Normal University (CN)
  • Yunnan University (CN)
  • Southeast University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Lei
  • Wu, Hao
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
276
Pages
110789
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383620541
Cited by
55
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
human activity recognition, contrastive learning, time series data augmentation, hierarchical feature learning, wearable sensors, deep supervision, invariance learning, semi-supervised learning, multi-level feature fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review