The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258703 · Cited by 1,607
The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community
O'Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27169153 · Cited by 909
Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for leadership research
Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006 · Cited by 599 · cited 4×
“It engages with CAS dynamics to produce emergence (Goldstein, 2007; Lichtenstein & Plowman, 2009-this issue), new ideas, innovation, adaptability, and change within organizations (e.g., Plowman et al., 2007; Plowman et al., 2007; Chiles et al., 2004; Hazy, 2008; Schneider and Somers, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialComplex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity
Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726701548001 · Cited by 489
Cited by
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005 · Cited by 1,426
“…Quarterly j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r .com/ locate / leaqua systems for instigating organizational change andmanaging dynamic social networks (Balkundi & Kilduff, 2006; Balkundi, Kilduff, & Harrison, 2011; Hannah, Lord, & Pearce, 2011; Marion & Uhl-Bien, 2002; Uhl-Bien & Marion, 2009).”
Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20040 · Cited by 463
Complexity Theory: An Overview with Potential Applications for the Social Sciences
Turner, J. R., & Baker, R. M. (2019) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems7010004 · Cited by 372
A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research
Dionne, S. D., Gupta, A., Sotak, K. L., Shirreffs, K. A., Serban, A., Hao, C., Kim, D. H., & Yammarino, F. J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R.
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 631-650
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017115869
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.007
- The paper
- Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. The Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
