CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47Education, Achievement, and GiftednessStudent Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Who learns from errors on a class test? Antecedents and profiles of adaptive reactions to errors in a failure situation

Open access
Grassinger, Robert, Dresel, Markus·2017·Learning and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adaptive reactions towards errors comprise two distinct constructs: affective-motivational and action reactions.

    “Several studies analysed the two reactions towards errors, showing that they represent two distinct constructs (Dresel et al., 2013;Grassinger & Dresel, 2017;Grassinger et al., 2018;Steuer et al., 2013;Tulis et al., 2018).”

    From Positive error climate promotes learning outcomes through students’ adaptive reactions towards errors (2022) · cites this paper as Grassinger & Dresel, 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Abramson, 1978, Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49, 10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ames, 1992, Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261, 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baker, 2007, Emotional approach and problem-focused coping: A comparison of potentially adaptive strategies, Cognition & Emotion, 21, 95, 10.1080/02699930600562276 · DOI
  4. Boekaerts, 1996, Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation, European Psychologist, 1, 100, 10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.100 · DOI
  5. Boyd, 1983, Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23, 94, 10.1177/0022167883232011 · DOI
  6. Cannon, 2001, Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 161, 10.1002/job.85 · DOI
  7. Dickhäuser, 2009, Leistung nach Misserfolg in Abhängigkeit von Zielorientierung und aufgabenspezifischem Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept [performance after failure depending on goal orientation and task-specific academic self-concept: An experimental study], Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, S., 247, 10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.247 · DOI
  8. Dickhäuser, 2009, How need for cognition affects the processing of achievement-related information, Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 283, 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.003 · DOI
  9. Dweck, 1986, Motivational processes affecting learning, American Psychologist, 41, 1040, 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Elliot, 1988, Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Försterling, 1984, Bedeutsamkeit, kausale Attribuierung und empfundener Aerger (importance, causal attributions and the emotion of anger), Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 192, 425
  12. Graham, S. & Williams, C. (2009). An attributional approach to motivation in school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (S. 11–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
  13. Grassinger, 2015, Ausprägung und Entwicklung adaptiver Reaktionen auf Fehler in der Sekundarstuge (Magnitude and Changes in Adaptive Dealing with Errors in Secondary School), Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 29, 215, 10.1024/1010-0652/a000162 · DOI
  14. Heimbeck, 2003, Integrating errors into the training process: The function of error management instructions and the role of goal orientation, Personnel Psychology, 56, 333, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00153.x · DOI
  15. Hulleman, 2010, A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels fort he same constucts of different constructs with similar labels?, Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422, 10.1037/a0018947 · DOI
  16. Keith, 2005, Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677, 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.677 · DOI
  17. Köller, 1996, Auslösende Bedingungen spontaner Attributionen: Die Rolle des experimentellen settings [antecedents of spontaneous attributions: The impact of different experimental settings], Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 27, 283
  18. Kreutzmann, 2014, Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 46, 101, 10.1026/0049-8637/a000103 · DOI
  19. Krohne, 2002, The cognitive regulation of emotions: The role of success versus failure experience and coping dispositions, Cognition and Emotion, 16, 217, 10.1080/02699930143000301 · DOI
  20. Little, 2002, To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits, Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. McAuley, 1992, Measuring causal attributions: The revised causal dimension scale (CDSII), Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 566, 10.1177/0146167292185006 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Möller, 1997, Spontane Kognitionen nach der Bekanntgabe von Klausurleistungen [Spontaneous cognitions after notification of examination results], Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 11, 195
  23. Nylund, 2007, Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study, Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535, 10.1080/10705510701575396 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Perels, 2007, Self-regulation from a process perspective, Journal of Psychology, 215, 194
  25. Peugh, 2004, Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement, Review of Educational Research, 74, 525, 10.3102/00346543074004525 · DOI
  26. Reisenzein, 2014, The attributional approach to emotion and motivation: Introduction to a special section of emotion review, Emotion Review, 6, 332, 10.1177/1754073914534508 · DOI
  27. Skaalvik, 1994, Attribution of perceived achievement in school in general and in maths and verbal areas: Relations with academic self-concept and self-esteem, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 133, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01090.x · DOI
  28. Spinath, 2003, Goal orientation and achievement: The role of ability self-concept and failure perception, Learning and Instruction, 13, 403, 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00014-2 · DOI
  29. Stiensmeier-Pelster, 1990, Performance deficits following failure: Integrating motivational and functional aspects of learned helplessness, Anxiety Research, 2, 211, 10.1080/08917779008249337 · DOI
  30. Tulis, 2011, Interest, enjoyment and pride after failure experiences? Predictors of students' state-emotions after success and failure during learning in mathematics, Educational Psychology, 31, 779, 10.1080/01443410.2011.608524 · DOI
  31. Tulis, M., Steuer, G. & Dresel, M. (2015). Learning from errors: Process and contextual conditions. Towards a model of individual processes within contexts. In M. Gartmeier, H. Gruber, T. Hascher & H. Heid (Eds.), Funktionen von Fehlern im Kontext individueller und gesellschaftlicher Entwicklung (S. 53–70). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich.
  32. Tulis, 2016, Learning from errors: A model of individual processes, Frontline Learning Research, 4, 12, 10.14786/flr.v4i2.168 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Weiner, 1985, An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion, Psychological Review, 92, 548, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Wirth, 2008, Self-regulated learning as a competence. Implications of theoretical models for assessment models, Journal of Psychology, 216, 102
  35. Witkowski, 1998, Performance deficits following failure: Learned helplessness or self-esteem protection?, British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 59, 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01157.x · DOI
  36. Zhao, 2011, Learning from errors: The role of context, emotion, and personality, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 435, 10.1002/job.696 · DOI
  37. Zhao, 2006, Error reporting in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 31, 1012, 10.5465/AMR.2006.22528167 · DOI
  38. Ziegler, 2005, Primary school sudents'implicit theories of intelligence and maladaptive behavioral patterns, Education Sciences and Psychology, 1, 76
  39. Zimmerman, 1986, Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key subprocesses?, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307, 10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grassinger, R., & Dresel, M.
Affiliations
University of Augsburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Grassinger, Robert
ORCID
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
53
Pages
61-68
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.009
OpenAlex
W2559550864
Cited by
47
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
error-based learning, test failure, ability self-concept, mastery goals, performance-avoidance goals, failure attribution, high school students, mathematics achievement, latent profiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review