Cited by 24Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessBehavioral Health and Interventions

Motivational foundations of self-control and mindfulness and their role in study–leisure conflicts

Grund, Axel, Senker, Kerstin·2018·Learning and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.007

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grund, A., & Senker, K.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University (DE)
Corresponding author
Grund, Axel
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
68
Pages
72-84
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898510492
Cited by
24
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
trait self-control, mindfulness, motivational conflict, value orientations, need satisfaction, activity preferences, academic engagement, leisure participation, students, self-regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review