Cited by 92Probiotics and Fermented FoodsFermentation and Sensory AnalysisInfant Nutrition and Health

Technological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw cereal material

Open access
Salvucci, Emiliano, LeBlanc, Jean Guy, Pérez, Gabriela·2016·LWT

Abstract

Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) were isolated from cereals and seeds from Argentinean markets. Colonies representing different morphological appearances were isolated and differentiated based on phenotypic characteristics. Fifty strains were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis obtaining LAB from genera Enterococcus, Lactobacillus and Pediococcus. Technological and nutritional characteristics (acidifying capacity, antimicrobial production, proteolytic activity, folate production) were analyzed. Lactobacillus pentosus ES124 and Lactobacillus plantarum ES137 presented high production of folate (61 and 57 ng/mL, respectively) as did Enterococcus mundtii ES63 which reached a total folate production of 70 ng/mL. Six LAB strains produced bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) with antilisterial activity. Eight strains were selected for use as sourdough starters and in situ applications based on their important technological properties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.02.043

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salvucci, E., LeBlanc, J. G., & Pérez, G.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Salvucci, Emiliano
Venue
LWT
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
70
Pages
185-191
ISSN
0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2273814593
Cited by
92
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • LWT (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministerio de la Producción, Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP-CONICET 2012-2014 N°11220110101051)
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2012- 1050)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, cereal seeds, sourdough starter, folate biosynthesis, bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances, antilisterial activity, proteolytic activity, Lactobacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus mundtii, in situ application, phenotypic characterization, 16S rRNA identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review