Cited by 37Body Composition Measurement TechniquesMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Does body mass index reflect adequately the body fat content in perimenopausal women?

Kontogianni, Meropi D., Panagiotakos, Demosthenes B., Skopouli, Fotini N.·2005·Maturitas

Abstract

Objective To test whether BMI cut-off points for obesity, reflect adequately the actual obesity status, in a sample of perimenopausal women. For study's purposes, a new bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) equation was estimated.Methods 115 Greek, middle-aged women were tested. Body composition was estimated by dual X-ray absorptiometry and BIA method. Waist (WC) and hip circumference (HC) and skinfolds were also measured.Results The BIA equation predicted fat free mass (FFM) from height, weight, age and resistance (R(2)=0.88, S.E.E.=1.89 kg). The bias was not significant and the limits of agreement +/-3.6 kg. BMI, FFM, body fat percentage (BF%), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), WC and HC did not differ between pre (N=37) and postmenopausal (N=48) women (at p=0.05). Both BF% and BMI correlated with WHR and WC (r(BF%-WHR)=0.287, p=0.009; r(BMI-WHR)=0.355, p=0.001 and r(BF%-WC)=0.72, p<0.0001; r(BMI-WC)=0.81, p<0.0001). The mean values for BF%, WC and WHR for women with normal BMI were 36.15% (+/-4.19), 72.53 cm (+/-3.64) and 0.749 (+/-0.05), whereas values for overweight women were 41.42% (+/-3.16), 83.06 cm (+/-7.55) and 0.787 (+/-0.05) and for obese these were 47.40% (+/-3.67), 95.10 cm (+/-8.52) and 0.814 (+/-0.05), respectively.Conclusion The body composition analysis of the study sample revealed undesirably high BF%, even in subjects with BMI below 25, in whom BMI did not reflect the body fat content. However, BF was mainly distributed at the lower part of the body. Whether BMI or BF% is a more sensitive index for obesity related diseases, in perimenopausal period, remains to be defined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.08.014

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kontogianni, M. D., Panagiotakos, D. B., & Skopouli, F. N.
Affiliations
Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Skopouli, Fotini N.
Venue
Maturitas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
307-313
ISSN
0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170886051
Cited by
37
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Maturitas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Harokopio University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
body mass index, body fat percentage, perimenopausal women, obesity, bioelectrical impedance analysis, fat-free mass, body composition, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, hip circumference, skinfold thickness, BMI cut-off points, postmenopausal women, Greek women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Electric Impedance, Perimenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review