Cited by 15Body Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyNutrition and Health in Aging

Development and validation of a bioelectrical impedance prediction equation estimating fat free mass in Greek - Caucasian adult population

Kanellakis, Spyridon, Skoufas, Efstathios, Karaglani, Eva, Ziogos, Georgia, Koutroulaki, Aimilia, Loukianou, Flora, Michalopoulou, Maria, Gkeka, Amalia +2 more·2020·Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Abstract

Background and aims Excessive body fat accumulation is associated with adverse health effects; therefore its accurate and reliable assessment is of great significance. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an easy and applicable equation, based on bioelectrical impedance analysis, estimating fat free mass in Greek general population and compare it with those of the literature. Methods Anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance parameters were obtained from 694 Greek adults (429 women and 265 men) so as to develop and validate the equation, using DXA as reference method. The validation and the reliability of the equation were examined with Bland-Altman analysis and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Results The developed prediction equation was FFM (kg) = 12.299 + (0.164 * Weight (kg)) + (7.287 * Gender (0:female, 1:male)) - (0.116 * Resistance (ohm)/Height (m)2) + (0.365 * Reactance (ohm)/Height (m)2) + (21.570 * Height (m)) (R 2 = 0.944, p < 0.0001). Regarding the current population, the current equation presented the lowest bias (-0.069 kg, p = 0.707) and the highest ICC (0.985) compared to those of the literature. Conclusion The current prediction equation was found to be valid and reliable in a representative sample of the Caucasian Greek general population and its utilization for body composition assessment could be an alternative of using labor-intensive, expensive and time-consuming reference methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.01.003

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanellakis, S., Skoufas, E., Karaglani, E., Ziogos, G., Koutroulaki, A., Loukianou, F., Michalopoulou, M., Gkeka, A., Marikou, F., & Manios, Y.
Affiliations
Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Kanellakis, Spyridon
Venue
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
36
Pages
166-170
ISSN
2405-4577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005852177
Cited by
15
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition ESPEN (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, fat-free mass, prediction equations, body composition assessment, equation validation, Greek adults, Caucasian population, anthropometry
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Body Weight, Female

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review