Cited by 20Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsIon channel regulation and function

Interleukin-16 inhibits sodium channel function and GluA1 phosphorylation via CD4- and CD9-independent mechanisms to reduce hippocampal neuronal excitability and synaptic activity

Open access
Hridi, Shehla U., Franssen, Aimée J.P.M., Jiang, Hui-Rong, Bushell, Trevor J.·2019·Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience

Abstract

Interleukin 16 (IL-16) is a cytokine that is primarily associated with CD4+ T cell function, but also exists as a multi-domain PDZ protein expressed within cerebellar and hippocampal neurons. We have previously shown that lymphocyte-derived IL-16 is neuroprotective against excitotoxicity, but evidence of how it affects neuronal function is limited. Here, we have investigated whether IL-16 modulates neuronal excitability and synaptic activity in mouse primary hippocampal cultures. Application of recombinant IL-16 impairs both glutamate-induced increases in intracellular Ca 2+ and sEPSC frequency and amplitude in a CD4- and CD9-independent manner. We examined the mechanisms underlying these effects, with rIL-16 reducing GluA1 S831 phosphorylation and inhibiting Na+ channel function. Taken together, these data suggest that IL-16 reduces neuronal excitability and synaptic activity via multiple mechanisms and adds further evidence that alternative receptors may exist for IL-16.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mcn.2019.01.002

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hridi, S. U., Franssen, A. J. P. M., Jiang, H.-R., & Bushell, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Bushell, Trevor J.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
95
Pages
71-78
ISSN
1044-7431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910781971
Cited by
20
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
interleukin-16, hippocampal neurons, neuronal excitability, synaptic activity, sodium channel inhibition, GluA1 phosphorylation, glutamate receptor subunits, intracellular calcium, excitatory postsynaptic currents, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Sodium Channels, CD4 Antigens, Receptors, AMPA, Neuroprotective Agents, Glutamic Acid, Interleukin-16, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mice, Tetraspanin 29

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review