Cited by 52Probiotics and Fermented FoodsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthNatural Products and Biological Research

Effect of probiotics on lipid profiles in hypercholesterolaemic adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mo, Rui, Zhang, Xingwei, Yang, Yunsheng·2019·Medicina Clínica

Abstract

Background Recent clinical studies have yielded controversial results regarding the effect of probiotics on lipid profiles. To assess the efficacy of probiotics in lowering serum lipid concentrations, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Methods Literature from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched and screened. The effects of probiotics on lipid profiles were assessed by mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). All included studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, 2014).Results A total of 19 RCTs, including 967 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Probiotic interventions reduced total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) compared to controls (placebo or no treatment) by -0.25mmol/L (95% CI: -0.39, -0.12) and -0.17mmol/L (95% CI: -0.25, -0.09), respectively. No significant effects of probiotics on triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were found. The effects of probiotics on decreasing TC and LDL-C levels were greater for longer intervention times, certain probiotic strains, and in younger mildly hypercholesterolaemic subjects.Conclusion This meta-analysis revealed that the use of probiotics can significantly lower TC and LDL-C levels in hypercholesterolaemic adults, which brings hope for reducing the risk factors for developing cardiovascular disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.medcli.2018.09.007

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mo, R., Zhang, X., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
Nankai University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yunsheng
Venue
Medicina Clínica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
152
Issue
12
Pages
473-481
ISSN
0025-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901833353
Cited by
52
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicina Clínica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2015AA020701)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Natural Products and Biological Research
Keywords
probiotics, hypercholesterolemia, lipid profile, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, intervention duration, probiotic strains, adults, dietary supplementation, effect size heterogeneity, publication bias, risk of bias assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Lipids, Lipoproteins, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Triglycerides, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review