Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 520

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep image mining for diabetic retinopathy screening

Open access
Quellec, Gwenolé, Charrière, Katia, Boudi, Yassine, Cochener, Béatrice, Lamard, Mathieu·2017·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

HighlightsA ConvNet is trained to detect images with referable diabetic retinopathy (DR).Training is supervised with image‐level annotations only (referable DR or not).Thanks to a modified training procedure, pathological pixels can also be detected.This solution outperforms DR screening systems in a public dataset of 90,000 images.It also outperforms lesion detectors in the DiaretDB1 dataset, for all lesion types. Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. ABSTRACT Deep learning is quickly becoming the leading methodology for medical image analysis. Given a large medical archive, where each image is associated with a diagnosis, efficient pathology detectors or classifiers can be trained with virtually no expert knowledge about the target pathologies. However, deep learning algorithms, including the popular ConvNets, are black boxes: little is known about the local patterns analyzed by ConvNets to make a decision at the image level. A solution is proposed in this paper to create heatmaps showing which pixels in images play a role in the image‐level predictions. In other words, a ConvNet trained for image‐level classification can be used to detect lesions as well. A generalization of the backpropagation method is proposed in order to train ConvNets that produce high‐quality heatmaps. The proposed solution is applied to diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in a dataset of almost 90,000 fundus photographs from the 2015 Kaggle Diabetic Retinopathy competition and a private dataset of almost 110,000 photographs (e‐ophtha). For the task of detecting referable DR, very good detection performance was achieved: Symbol in Kaggle’s dataset and Symbol in e‐ophtha. Performance was also evaluated at the image level and at the lesion level in the DiaretDB1 dataset, where four types of lesions are manually segmented: microaneurysms, hemorrhages, exudates and cotton‐wool spots. For the task of detecting images containing these four lesion types, the proposed detector, which was trained to detect referable DR, outperforms recent algorithms trained to detect those lesions specifically, with pixel‐level supervision. At the lesion level, the proposed detector outperforms heatmap generation algorithms for ConvNets. This detector is part of the Messidor® system for mobile eye pathology screening. Because it does not rely on expert knowledge or manual segmentation for detecting relevant patterns, the proposed solution is a promising image mining tool, which has the potential to discover new biomarkers in images. Symbol. No Caption available. Symbol. No Caption available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2017.04.012

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 520

Metadata

Authors
Quellec, G., Charrière, K., Boudi, Y., Cochener, B., & Lamard, M.
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
39
Pages
178-193
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952436003
Cited by
520
References
15
FWCI
29.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep image mining for diabetic retinopathy screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2017.04.012
The paper
Quellec, G., Charrière, K., Boudi, Y., Cochener, B., & Lamard, M. (2017). Deep image mining for diabetic retinopathy screening. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.04.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.