Cited by 8Neurological disorders and treatmentsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Treatment of depression with deep brain stimulation works by altering in specific ways the conscious perception of the core symptoms of sadness or anhedonia, not by modulating network circuitry

Eggers, Arnold E.·2014·Medical Hypotheses

Abstract

An important advance in the management of treatment-resistant depression has recently been reported: deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subgenual cingulate (Brodmann area 25 or Cg 25) or the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). These treatments produce a response rate, meaning significant clinical improvement, of about 50%, but only a few patients are returned completely to normal. The authors of these papers generally attribute the therapeutic response to restoration of an altered or perturbed neural network. In contrast, the idea advanced here is that DBS works by altering conscious perception of the core symptoms of sadness and anhedonia, not by modulating network circuitry. In the case of Cg25, the crucial thing about this site is that it is where conscious perception of sadness localizes. However, the stimulus frequency of DBS (130Hz) was too fast to support consciousness, which is associated with gamma frequencies (35-85Hz). Therefore, the imposed rapid frequency instantaneously blocked the subjective experience of sadness. In the case of the NAcc, the treatment worked by stimulating hot zones in the NAcc, which, in animal models, are known to intensify the perception of pleasure. This magnifier effect on the perception of pleasure was able to alleviate anhedonia. The response was not instantaneous but could begin within hours. In both cases, patients' realization that a core symptom had been relieved led to a moderate overall improvement in other symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.04.007

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These opposite modulatory entrances into the same circuit appear to result in different but related antidepressant outcomes.

    “These opposite modulatory entrances into the same circuit appear to result in different but related antidepressant outcomes [97].”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [97]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eggers, A. E.
Affiliations
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
Corresponding author
Eggers, Arnold E.
Venue
Medical Hypotheses
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
62-64
ISSN
0306-9877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012915648
Cited by
8
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Hypotheses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, nucleus accumbens, anhedonia, sadness, conscious perception, gamma oscillations, stimulation frequency, hot zone, neural network modulation
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review