Cited by 59Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Development and Digital TechnologyGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Causation model of autism: Audiovisual brain specialization in infancy competes with social brain networks

Open access
Heffler, Karen Frankel, Oestreicher, Leonard M.·2016·Medical Hypotheses

Abstract

Earliest identifiable findings in autism indicate that the autistic brain develops differently from the typical brain in the first year of life, after a period of typical development. Twin studies suggest that autism has an environmental component contributing to causation. Increased availability of audiovisual (AV) materials and viewing practices of infants parallel the time frame of the rise in prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Studies have shown an association between ASD and increased TV/cable screen exposure in infancy, suggesting AV exposure in infancy as a possible contributing cause of ASD. Infants are attracted to the saliency of AV materials, yet do not have the experience to recognize these stimuli as socially relevant. The authors present a developmental model of autism in which exposure to screen-based AV input in genetically susceptible infants stimulates specialization of non-social sensory processing in the brain. Through a process of neuroplasticity, the autistic infant develops the skills that are driven by the AV viewing. The AV developed neuronal pathways compete with preference for social processing, negatively affecting development of social brain pathways and causing global developmental delay. This model explains atypical face and speech processing, as well as preference for AV synchrony over biological motion in ASD. Neural hyper-connectivity, enlarged brain size and special abilities in visual, auditory and motion processing in ASD are al…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.06.019

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The absence of facial expressions, body language, and vocal tone in digital communication can make it difficult for autistic individuals to discern sarcasm, subtext, or emotional intent conveyed through text.

    “The absence of facial expressions, body language, and vocal tone can make it difficult to discern sarcasm, subtext, or emotional intent conveyed through text [48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heffler, K. F., & Oestreicher, L. M.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Heffler, Karen Frankel
Venue
Medical Hypotheses
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
91
Pages
114-122
ISSN
0306-9877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W772121675
Cited by
59
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Hypotheses (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, social brain network, neuroplasticity, face processing, speech processing, biological motion, brain size, early intervention, developmental model
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Animals, Auditory Perceptual Disorders, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Disease Models, Animal, Environment, Face, Humans, Infant, Models, Neurological, Neuronal Plasticity, Social Behavior, Speech, Television, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review