Cited by 48Probiotics and Fermented FoodsAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAquaculture disease management and microbiota

Selection of new lactic acid bacteria strains bearing probiotic features from mucosal microbiota of healthy calves: Looking for immunobiotics through in vitro and in vivo approaches for immunoprophylaxis applications

Open access
Sandes, Sávio, Alvim, Luige, Silva, Bruno, Acurcio, Leonardo, Santos, Cinara, Campos, Márcia, Santos, Camila, Nicoli, Jacques +2 more·2017·Microbiological Research

Abstract

From the birth, since their mucosal microbiota and immune system are not fully developed, newborn calves are susceptible to several mucosal pathogenic microorganisms. Operating through humoral and non-humoral mechanisms in the host, several lactic acid bacteria strains bearing probiotic features are often employed in livestock as food supplement, improving animal production performance, promoting health and reducing the severity of mucosal infections. Accordingly, we isolated, species-level identified and screened for their probiotic potentials seventy lactic acid bacteria strains from upper airway, vaginal and intestinal mucosa of healthy calves. Based on in vitro approaches, we selected three strains: Lactobacillus fermentum V3B-08 isolated from upper airway mucosa, Weissella hellenica V1V-30 isolated from vaginal mucosa and Lactobacillus farciminis B4F-06 isolated from intestinal mucosa were used to mono-colonize germ-free mice in the same site in which these strains were isolated, aiming to characterize their immunomodulatory features. These strains were able to colonize germ-free mice mucosa and trigger sIgA synthesis at a local level, in addition to stimulating, in different ways, adaptive immune responses at a systemic level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.micres.2017.03.008

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to MATS classification, L. helveticus 34.9 can be considered a hydrophilic strain.

    “According to this classification, L. helveticus 34.9 can be considered a hydrophilic strain, which is in accordance with the results obtained for L. helveticus T103 [35], L. helveticus R0052 [36], and L. helveticus ATCC 12046 [37].”

    From The Biological Role of the S-Layer Produced by Lactobacillus helveticus 34.9 in Cell Protection and Its Probiotic Properties (2024) · cites this paper as [34]

    Section 2.4 defines hydrophilic strains as having MATS values of 44.99% or less, but does not give a value for L. helveticus 34.9. Section 3.1 and the strain results concern other species; searches for L. helveticus 34.9 and the named comparator strains found no measurement or classification for them in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandes, S., Alvim, L., Silva, B., Acurcio, L., Santos, C., Campos, M., Santos, C., Nicoli, J., Neumann, E., & Nunes, Á.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Sandes, Sávio
Venue
Microbiological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
200
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0944-5013 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2598214641
Cited by
48
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbiological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (505802/2008-2)
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (APQ 02003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, probiotics, immunobiotics, calves, mucosal microbiota, Lactobacillus fermentum, Weissella hellenica, Lactobacillus farciminis, secretory IgA, immunomodulation, germ-free mice, mucosal colonization, upper airway, vaginal mucosa, intestinal mucosa, mucosal infection, immunoprophylaxis
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibiosis, Bacterial Adhesion, Bile Acids and Salts, Cattle, DNA, Bacterial, Female, Gastric Juice, Hydrogen Peroxide, Immunoglobulin A, Secretory, Immunization, Intestinal Mucosa, Lactobacillus, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mucous Membrane, Colony Count, Microbial, Cytokines, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Lactic Acid, Probiotics, Genes, rRNA, Mice, Adaptive Immunity, Immunomodulation, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Weissella, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review