Cited by 85Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumReproductive System and Pregnancy

Longitudinal study of emotional experiences, grief and depressive symptoms in women and men after miscarriage

Volgsten, Helena, Jansson, Caroline, Svanberg, Agneta Skoog, Darj, Elisabeth, Stavreus-Evers, Anneli·2018·Midwifery

Abstract

Objective Although miscarriage is common and affects up to 20% of pregnant women, little is known about these couples' short term and long term experiences after miscarriage. The aim of the present study was to study emotional experience, grief and depressive symptoms in women and men, one week and four months after miscarriage.Research design /setting Women, (n = 103), and their male partner (n = 78), were recruited at the gynecological clinic after miscarriage. Control women were recruited from the general population. Three validated questionnaires concerning psychological wellbeing and mental health, RIMS, PGS and MADRS-S were answered by the participants one week and four months after the miscarriage.Findings It was shown that for women, the emotional experiences of miscarriage, grief and depressive symptoms were more pronounced than for their male partners. Grief and depressive symptoms were reduced with time, which was not the case for the emotional experiences of miscarriage. Previous children was favorable for emotional experience while previous miscarriage or infertility treatment made the emotional experience worse.Conclusion Grief and depressive symptoms is reduced over time while emotional experiences such as isolation, loss of baby and a devastating event persist for longer time than four months. Lack of previous children, previous miscarriage and infertility diagnosis could increase negative emotional experiences after miscarriage, this was especially pronounced for grief reaction. The questionnaires could be used both clinically and in research to understand the emotional experiences after miscarriage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.003

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volgsten, H., Jansson, C., Svanberg, A. S., Darj, E., & Stavreus-Evers, A.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Stavreus-Evers, Anneli
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
64
Pages
23-28
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804625508
Cited by
85
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
miscarriage, grief, depressive symptoms, emotional experience, couples, male partners, psychological well-being, infertility treatment, longitudinal change, gender differences
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Female, Grief, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parents, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review