Cited by 297Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The Perinatal Grief Scale: Development and initial validation.

Toedter, Lori J., Lasker, Judith N., Alhadeff, Janice M.·1988·American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Abstract

The theoretical strategy underlying development of the Perinatal Grief Scale is described. The instrument was completed by 194 subjects as part of a longitudinal study of factors affecting the resolution of grief following spontaneous abortion, fetal or neonatal death, or ectopic pregnancy. Variables found to be significant predictors of grief, as measured by this scale, were: overall physical health of mother, gestational age at time of loss, quality of the marital relationship, and pre-loss mental health symptomatology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1988.tb01604.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most commonly used instruments in quantitative and mixed methods studies were the Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Perinatal Grief Scale and Impact of Event Scale.

    “The most commonly used instruments were the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [19], the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [20], the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) [21] and the Impact of Event Scale (IES) [22].”
  • PGS was initially developed and validated in a sample of mainly bereaved mothers (women n=138, men n=56).

    “The PGS, for example, was initially developed and validated in a sample of mainly bereaved mothers (women n = 138 and men n = 56) [117].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toedter, L. J., Lasker, J. N., & Alhadeff, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Moravian University (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Published
1988
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
435-449
ISSN
  • 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0025
OpenAlex
W2111692178
Cited by
297
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2 R01 HD18431-04)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
Perinatal Grief Scale, perinatal grief, miscarriage, fetal death, neonatal death, ectopic pregnancy, grief resolution, scale development, instrument validation, maternal physical health, gestational age, marital quality
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Fetal Death, Gestational Age, Grief, Humans, Male, Marriage, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review