Cited by 41Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumReproductive Health and Technologies

Couples and Miscarriage: The Influence of Gender and Reproductive Factors on the Impact of Miscarriage

Huffman, Carolyn S., Schwartz, Todd A., Swanson, Kristen M.·2015·Women's Health Issues

Abstract

Objective We sought to understand the effect of gender, age, mental health history, and reproductive factors on the appraisal of miscarriage in couples.Design We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Couples Miscarriage Healing Project.Sample We analyzed data from 341 couples who had miscarried within 3 months of the original study recruitment.Method Multifactorial analysis of variance was used to analyze baseline effects of gender, age, mental health history, infertility, number of miscarriages, living children, and gestational age on the impact of miscarriage as measured by the three subscales of the Revised Impact of Miscarriage Scale: Isolation/Guilt, Devastating Event, and Loss of Baby.Results Women scored significantly higher than men on all measures. Younger couples in whom either member had been previously treated for anxiety, depression, or grief were more likely to feel guilt and isolation over their miscarriage than those with no such history (13.30 vs. 11.64; p < .0001) and older couples with and without a mental health treatment history. Younger couples were also more likely to identify miscarriage as the "loss of a baby" and feel more devastated than older couples. Couples with infertility were more devastated (14.30 vs. 11.20; p < .01) and felt more isolation/guilt related to miscarriage (13.59 vs. 12.72; p < .05).Conclusions In general, couples experiencing miscarriage after 8 weeks gestation were more impacted than when the miscarriage occurred before 8 weeks. Recommendations for future practice and research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2015.04.005

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantitative studies comparing heterosexual couples' experiences following pregnancy loss and neonatal death suggest that men typically experience less intense and enduring levels of grief than women.

    “For example, quantitative studies comparing heterosexual couples’ experiences following pregnancy loss and neonatal death suggest that men typically experience less intense and enduring levels of grief than women [18–23].”
  • Current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men.

    “current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men”
  • There is currently limited evidence to suggest that grief following pregnancy loss is affected by gestational age.

    “Despite this variability, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that grief following pregnancy loss is affected by gestational age [3, 21–25].”
  • With the exception of one study which employed author-developed measures of grief and support service satisfaction, the remaining quantitative studies employed standardised and validated measures for both predictors and grief.

    “With the exception of one study which employed author-developed measures of grief and support service satisfaction [70] the remaining quantitative studies employed standardised and validated measures for both predictors and grief [23–25, 67, 76, 84, 86–96].”
  • Some included studies noted that the use of existing grief measures (including the PGS and RIMS) might not be valid for measuring men's grief experiences, particularly in relation to potential differences between internal versus external grieving styles.

    “Importantly, however, some studies noted that the use of existing grief measures (including the PGS and RIMS) might not be valid for measuring men’s grief experiences, particularly in relation to potential differences between internal versus external grieving styles [23, 84, 89, 95].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huffman, C. S., Schwartz, T. A., & Swanson, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Appalachian State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Seattle University (US)
Corresponding author
Huffman, Carolyn S.
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
570-578
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1801318408
Cited by
41
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (5 R01 NR005343)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (5-T32-NR007091-14, 5 R01 NR005343)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
miscarriage, couples, gender differences, reproductive factors, infertility, mental health history, guilt, social isolation, grief, gestational age, age
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Family Characteristics, Female, Grief, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Social Support, Reproductive History

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review