Cited by 98COVID-19 Impact on ReproductionMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Women's experiences of maternity service reconfiguration during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative investigation

Open access
Silverio, Sergio A., De Backer, Kaat, Easter, Abigail, von Dadelszen, Peter, Magee, Laura A., Sandall, Jane·2021·Midwifery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore women's experiences of maternity service reconfiguration during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: South London, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Women (N=23) who gave birth between March and August 2020 in one of the ten South London maternity hospitals. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted (N=23), via video-conferencing software. Transcribed interviews were analysed 'by hand' using Microsoft Word. Template analysis was selected to code, analyse, and interpret data, according to the findings of a recently-published national survey of maternity service reconfiguration across the UK in response to COVID-19. FINDINGS: Three main themes emerged through analysis: (i) Disruption to In-Person Care and Increased Virtual Care Provision, (ii) Changes to Labour and Birth Preferences and Plans, (iii) Advice for Navigating Maternity Services During a Pandemic. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Women reported mixed views on the reduction in scheduled in-person appointments. The increase in remote care, especially via telephone, was not well endorsed by women. Furthermore, women reported an under-reliance on healthcare professionals for support, rather turning to family. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We provide insight into the experiences of women who received antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings should inform healthcare policy to build back better maternity care services after the pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103116

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. King N Brooks J. Doing template analysis: A guide to the main components and procedures. In: Template analysis for business and management students 2017 SAGE Los Angeles 25 46
  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) Clinical guidance [CG190]. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies 2017 NICE London 31820894

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverio, S. A., De Backer, K., Easter, A., von Dadelszen, P., Magee, L. A., & Sandall, J.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Silverio, Sergio A.
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
102
Pages
103116
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3187122188
Cited by
98
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 6
FWCI
18.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR‐INF‐2170, COVID-19, NIHR200306)
  • Department of Health and Social Care (COVID-19)
  • King's College London (204823/Z/16/Z)
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, women's experiences, virtual care, telephone care, prenatal care, intrapartum care, postpartum care, family support, healthcare policy, South London
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review