Cited by 155Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceDNA Repair MechanismsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

The Telomere Deprotection Response Is Functionally Distinct from the Genomic DNA Damage Response

Open access
Cesare, Anthony J., Hayashi, Makoto T., Crabbe, Laure, Karlseder, Jan·2013·Molecular Cell

Abstract

Loss of chromosome end protection through telomere erosion is a hallmark of aging and senescence. Here we developed an experimental system that mimics physiological telomere deprotection in human cells and discovered that the telomere deprotection response is functionally distinct from the genomic DNA damage response. We found that, unlike genomic breaks, deprotected telomeres that are recognized as DNA damage but remain in the fusion-resistant intermediate state activate differential ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling where CHK2 is not phosphorylated. Also unlike genomic breaks, we found that deprotected telomeres do not contribute to the G2/M checkpoint and are instead passed through cell division to induce p53-dependent G1 arrest in the daughter cells. Telomere deprotection is therefore an epigenetic signal passed between cell generations to ensure that replication-associated telomere-dependent growth arrest occurs in stable diploid G1 phase cells before genome instability can occur.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.006

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DNA damage signaling from partial telomere deprotection is insufficient to fully activate the ATM-mediated G2/M checkpoint; after mitosis, DNA damage induces p53-dependent G1 exit.

    “In agreement with this hypothesis, a recent report showed that, unlike genomic breaks, DNA damage signaling elicited by partial telomere deprotection is insufficient to fully activate the ATM-mediated G2/M checkpoint.83 Instead, after completion of mitosis, DNA damage induces p53-dependent cell cycle exit in G1.”

    From Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited (2015) · cites this paper as [83]

  • Transient Chk1/2 activation from partial TRF2 depletion or acute DNA damage, when p21 induction is inefficient, can delay but not prevent mitosis.

    “Conversely, transient Chk1/2 activation, induced by partial TRF2 depletion 83 or acute DNA damage (by IR), 93 in the absence of (efficient) p21 induction can transiently delay, but not prevent mitosis.”

    From Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited (2015) · cites this paper as [83]

  • Mitotic bypass requires p53; its absence leads to aberrant mitosis and cell death.

    “The results showing that mitotic bypass requires p53, as its absence leads to aberrant mitosis and cell death, corroborate the observations by the Karlseder team, 83 but they apparently contradict the finding that mitotic bypass in p53-deficient cells leads to endoreplication.88”

    From Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited (2015) · cites this paper as [83]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cesare, A. J., Hayashi, M. T., Crabbe, L., & Karlseder, J.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Corresponding author
Karlseder, Jan
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
141-155
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033673317
Cited by
155
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 6
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of California, Irvine
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009370, P30CA014195)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM087476, R01GM087476)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
telomere shortening, DNA damage response, ATM signaling, Chk2 phosphorylation, G1 cell cycle arrest, p53, G2/M checkpoint, genomic instability, cellular senescence, aging, telomere fusion
MeSH terms
Cell Division, DNA Damage, DNA Replication, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Mitosis, Blotting, Western, Transcriptional Activation, Genome, Human, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, G2 Phase, Telomere, Cellular Senescence, Telomeric Repeat Binding Protein 2, Immunoprecipitation, Cell Proliferation, Cell Cycle Checkpoints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review