Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited
Open accessAbstract
Senescence was classically defined as an irreversible cell cycle arrest in G1 phase (G1 exit) triggered by eroded telomeres in aged primary cells. The molecular basis of this G1 arrest is thought to be due to a DNA damage response, resulting in accumulation of the cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors p21 and p16 that block the inactivating phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor pRb, thereby preventing DNA replication. More than a decade ago, several studies showed that p21 also mediates permanent DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest in G2 (G2 exit) by inhibiting mitotic Cdk complexes and pRb phosphorylation. The idea that the senescence program can also be launched after G2 arrest has gained support from several recent publications, including evidence for its existence in vivo.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 98 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
The ATM/p53/p21 pathway triggered by telomere erosion or activated oncogenes has a central role in senescence-associated G1 arrest.
“Like in proliferating cells exposed to DNA damage, 32,33 the ATM/ p53/p21 pathway triggered by telomere erosion or activated oncogenes plays a central role in senescence-associated G1 arrest (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Waldman T, 1995, Cancer Res
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Senescence is increasingly viewed as an early defense against tumor development by preventing proliferation of cells with damaged DNA.
“Senescence is increasingly considered to be an essential early line of defense against tumor development by preventing proliferation of cells with damaged DNA, [10][11][12]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10][11][12]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Senescent cells are found in pre-cancerous lesions in mice and humans but not in later malignant stages.
“Moreover, senescent cells are observed in pre-cancerous lesions in mice and in humans, but not in the subsequent malignant stages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited
p21 also mediates permanent DNA damage-induced G2 arrest by inhibiting mitotic Cdk complexes and pRb phosphorylation.
“More than a decade ago, several studies showed that p21 also mediates permanent DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest in G2 (G2 exit) by inhibiting mitotic Cdk complexes and pRb phosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
p21 blocks the inactivating phosphorylation of pRb by Cdk2 and Cdk4/6, a key mechanism in the senescence program.
“In addition to directly preventing DNA replication by inhibiting Cdk2, p21 also blocks the inactivating phosphorylation of pRb by Cdk2 and Cdk4/6 (Fig. 1), which is a key mechanism in the senescence program.39”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Senescence contributes to tissue remodeling during embryonic development.
“Finally, recent work has shown that senescence contributes also to tissue remodeling during embryonic development, 21,22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited
The idea that senescence can be launched after G2 arrest has gained support from recent publications, including in vivo evidence.
“The idea that the senescence program can also be launched after G2 arrest has gained support from several recent publications, including evidence for its existence in vivo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Radiation-induced senescence results from mitotic bypass of stably G2-arrested cells into tetraploid G1, where cyclin D1 accumulates.
“Ye el al. showed that radiation-induced cellular senescence results from mitotic bypass of stably G2arrested cells into a tetraploid G1 phase, where they accumulate cyclin D1. 90”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In HCT-116 cells, p21 knockout after transient G2 arrest leads to aberrant mitoses, polyploidy, or cell death.
“Indeed, after transiently arresting in G2, HCT-116 cells in which p21 was knocked out eventually underwent aberrant mitoses, leading to polyploidy or cell death.53,55”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
In p53/pRb-deficient MEFs, persistent telomere dysfunction causes prolonged G2 arrest and genome reduplication/tetraploidy because the p53/p21-dependent G1/S checkpoint is absent.
“Conversely, in p53/pRb-deficient MEFs, DNA damage generated by persistent telomere dysfunction induces prolonged G2 arrest that leads to genome reduplication and tetraploidy due to the absence of the p53/p21-dependent G1/S checkpoint (Fig. 3; 88 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Overexpressed p21 in U2OS osteosarcoma cells only weakly associates with cyclin B1-Cdk1.
“even after its overexpression in U2OS osteosarcoma cancer cells, p21 only weakly associated with cyclin B1-Cdk1).58”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In primary fibroblasts exposed to genotoxic drugs, p21 associates with and sequesters inactive cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes in the nucleus, preventing mitotic entry.
“In primary fibroblasts exposed to genotoxic drugs, in addition to inhibiting cyclin A-Cdk1/2 complexes, 59 p21 also associates with and sequesters inactive cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes in the nucleus, thereby preventing mitotic entry 69 (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The G2 exit program could in principle apply to replicative senescence because telomeric attrition is expected to be detected as DNA damage at the end of S phase.
“Noteworthy, the “G2 exit program” could in principle apply to replicative senescence because telomeric attritions are expected to become apparent (and to be detected as DNA damage) at the end of the S phase (reviewed in ref. 36 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Stable G2 arrest induced by ionizing radiation is associated with p53/p21-dependent premature APC/C-Cdh1 activation and degradation of mitotic cyclins.
“Moreover, stable G2 arrest induced by ionizing radiation (IR) was associated with p53/p21-dependent premature APC/C Cdh1 activation and degradation of mitotic cyclins, consistent with previous observations.[74][75][76]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74][75][76]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In p53-deficient cells arrested in G2, cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes are inactive.
“The uncertainty regarding the role of p21 in the G2/M checkpoint was further supported by the findings that in p53-deficient cells arrested in G2, cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes are inactive 57”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Levedakou EN, 1995, Cancer Res
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
These findings suggested that p21 induces senescence after G2 arrest by blocking pRb/p130 phosphorylation.
“This suggested that p21 induces senescence upon G2 arrest by blocking pRb/p130 phosphorylation (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
After DNA damage, G2/M-specific gene expression is reduced in a p53- or pRb-dependent manner.
“Moreover, in response to DNA damage, the expression of G2/M-specific genes is reduced in a p53-or pRb-dependent manner.61,60,62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
In telomerase-negative cells, eroded telomeres elicit a DNA damage response predominantly in G2, leading to p53/p21-dependent arrest or exit with 4N DNA content.
“More recently, it has been shown that in telomerase-negative cells eroded telomeres elicit DDR predominantly in G2, leading to p53/p21-dependent cell cycle arrest/ exit with 4N DNA content.81”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A fraction of senescent fibroblasts with 4N DNA and strong cyclin D1 expression arises from cell cycle exit after G2 arrest, not from gradual accumulation of bi-nucleate or tetraploid G1 cells.
“The first paper demonstrated that the presence of a significant fraction of senescent fibroblasts with a 4N DNA content and strongly expressing cyclin D1 is not due to gradual accumulation of bi-nucleate or tetraploid G1 cells in aging cultures, but the consequence of cell cycle exit after G2 arrest.79”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Two reports showed that replicative senescence can also be triggered in G2 phase.
“First, 2 reports showed that replicative senescence could also be triggered in the G2 phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cell cycle exit in p21-deficient cells is associated with p16 accumulation.
“In addition to a previous report, 48 this alternative possibility is also supported by data showing that cell cycle exit in p21deficient cells is associated with p16 accumulation (Figure S3B in ref. 93 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
p21-dependent cyclin B1 nuclear retention was identified as the first step triggering the G2 exit program, leading to permanent cell cycle withdrawal.
“They elegantly confirmed and extended previous observations 58,69 and pinpointed this event as the first step in triggering the G2 exit program, resulting in permanent cell cycle withdrawal (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
Inhibition of Cdc25 phosphatases prevents activation of cyclin E1-Cdk2.
“The ATM/ATR kinases induce the early response by activating Chk1/2 checkpoint kinases that, in turn, by inhibiting Cdc25 phosphatases, prevent activation of cyclin E1-Cdk2, which is a key regulator of G1/S transition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
p53 induces the Cdk inhibitor p21.
“ATM also phosphorylates the p53 tumor suppressor that, by inducing the Cdk inhibitor p21 Waf1/Cip1 (p21), plays a central role in the G1 exit program (late response).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
p16 plays a key role in senescence maintenance.
“While p16 does not intervene in G1 arrest (p16 is upregulated after induction of p21 and G1 arrest), it plays a key role in senescence maintenance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
p21/p27-mediated cyclin B1 nuclear retention in mouse fibroblasts lacking pocket proteins does not induce senescence.
“Indeed, as mentioned above, p21/p27-mediated cyclin B1 nuclear retention in mouse fibroblasts lacking pocket proteins does not induce senescence.73”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
p21 inhibits cyclin D1-Cdk4/6 complexes in addition to cyclin E1-Cdk2 complexes.
“In addition to cyclin E1-Cdk2 (cE1-K2) complexes, p21 also inhibits cyclin D1-Cdk4/6 (cD1-K4/6) complexes that phosphorylate and inactivate pRb family pocket proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Active pRb blocks E2F1-driven transcription of genes needed for G1/S progression.
“In turn, active pRb inhibits the E2F1-dependent expression of genes controlling G1/S progression, thus irreversibly blocking the cell cycle entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Stimuli that promote senescence turn on the ATM/ATR DNA damage signaling pathway.
“Pro-senescence stimuli activate the ATM/ATR DNA damage-signaling pathway, leading to stable G2 arrest that entails mitotic bypass (see also Fig.3) and permanent cell cycle arrest in a tetraploid G1 phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Stable G2 arrest entails mitotic bypass.
“Pro-senescence stimuli activate the ATM/ATR DNA damage-signaling pathway, leading to stable G2 arrest that entails mitotic bypass (see also Fig.3) and permanent cell cycle arrest in a tetraploid G1 phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
p16 does not intervene in G1 arrest.
“While p16 does not intervene in G1 arrest (p16 is upregulated after induction of p21 and G1 arrest), it plays a key role in senescence maintenance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
APC/C-Cdh1-mediated cyclin B1 degradation before cell cycle exit is dispensable for that exit.
“Surprisingly, and somewhat counter-intuitively, they showed that APC/C Cdh1 -mediated cyclin B1 degradation before cell cycle exit is actually dispensable for the latter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
p16 levels rise following p21 induction and G1 arrest.
“While p16 does not intervene in G1 arrest (p16 is upregulated after induction of p21 and G1 arrest), it plays a key role in senescence maintenance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
p21 is central to the late G1 exit program.
“ATM also phosphorylates the p53 tumor suppressor that, by inducing the Cdk inhibitor p21 Waf1/Cip1 (p21), plays a central role in the G1 exit program (late response).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
This activation leads to stable G2 arrest.
“Pro-senescence stimuli activate the ATM/ATR DNA damage-signaling pathway, leading to stable G2 arrest that entails mitotic bypass (see also Fig.3) and permanent cell cycle arrest in a tetraploid G1 phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
This inhibition by pRb irreversibly blocks cell cycle entry.
“In turn, active pRb inhibits the E2F1-dependent expression of genes controlling G1/S progression, thus irreversibly blocking the cell cycle entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Chk1/2 checkpoint kinases inhibit Cdc25 phosphatases.
“The ATM/ATR kinases induce the early response by activating Chk1/2 checkpoint kinases that, in turn, by inhibiting Cdc25 phosphatases, prevent activation of cyclin E1-Cdk2, which is a key regulator of G1/S transition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
ATM/ATR kinases start the early response through activation of Chk1/2 checkpoint kinases.
“The ATM/ATR kinases induce the early response by activating Chk1/2 checkpoint kinases that, in turn, by inhibiting Cdc25 phosphatases, prevent activation of cyclin E1-Cdk2, which is a key regulator of G1/S transition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Stable G2 arrest also involves lasting arrest in a tetraploid G1 phase.
“Pro-senescence stimuli activate the ATM/ATR DNA damage-signaling pathway, leading to stable G2 arrest that entails mitotic bypass (see also Fig.3) and permanent cell cycle arrest in a tetraploid G1 phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Some evidence suggests that the G2/M checkpoint, not the G1/S checkpoint, could trigger replicative senescence.
“Moreover, some data also suggest that the G2/ M and not the G1/S checkpoint might be responsible for the onset of replicative senescence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
p21-dependent sequestration of cyclin B1 does not occur in U2OS cells.
“In addition, by using fluorescent cyclin B1 and video-microscopy, they confirmed earlier observations 72 that p21-dependent sequestration of cyclin B1 does not take place in U2OS cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The main role of p21 in senescence is more likely to trigger pRb-mediated repression of cell cycle regulators than to cause nuclear translocation of cyclin B1-Cdk1.
“Although this is the first detectable event, it is more likely that main role of p21 lies in its capacity to trigger pRb-mediated repression of cell cycle regulators (Fig. 2, for more information on p21 functions (see ref. 98 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Transient Chk1/2 activation from partial TRF2 depletion or acute DNA damage, when p21 induction is inefficient, can delay but not prevent mitosis.
“Conversely, transient Chk1/2 activation, induced by partial TRF2 depletion 83 or acute DNA damage (by IR), 93 in the absence of (efficient) p21 induction can transiently delay, but not prevent mitosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
When p53 is absent, this pathway only briefly blocks G2/M progression.
“In p53-deficient cells, this pathway transiently blocks G2/M progression, but the p53/p21 pathway is required to stabilize G2 arrest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Stabilization of G2 arrest requires the p53/p21 pathway.
“In p53-deficient cells, this pathway transiently blocks G2/M progression, but the p53/p21 pathway is required to stabilize G2 arrest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Early in this response, Chk1/2 inhibits Cdc25 phosphatases.
“The early response involves Chk1/2-mediated inhibition of Cdc25 phosphatases, which promote mitosis by activating cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes (cB1/K1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
This stable G2 arrest causes endoreplication through mitotic bypass.
“In p53-deficient cells, in the case of persistent telomere dysfunction, DNA damage induces strong and sustained Chk1/2 activation leading to stable G2 arrest that, via mitotic bypass, leads to endoreplication, resulting in tetraploidy.88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
When p53 is missing and telomere dysfunction persists, DNA damage triggers robust, prolonged Chk1/2 activation.
“In p53-deficient cells, in the case of persistent telomere dysfunction, DNA damage induces strong and sustained Chk1/2 activation leading to stable G2 arrest that, via mitotic bypass, leads to endoreplication, resulting in tetraploidy.88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
APC/C-Cdh1 activation leads to degradation of cyclin B1 and other mitotic regulators.
“In addition to inhibiting cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes, p21 mediates premature activation of APC/C-Cdh1, leading to degradation of cyclin B1 and other mitotic regulators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
After this, APC/C-Cdh1-mediated breakdown of cyclin B1 and other mitotic regulators occurs before mitotic bypass.
“Subsequent APC/C-Cdh1-mediated degradation of cyclin B1 and other mitotic regulators precedes mitotic bypass (skip), leading to irreversible arrest (senescence) in a tetraploid (4N) G1 phase, characterized by accumulation of G1 cyclins (cyclin D1, cD1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
This sequestration locks cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes in the inactive state.
“In p53-proficient cells, DNA damage-induced G2 arrest leads to p21-dependent nuclear sequestration of cyclin B1-Cdk1 (cB1) complexes, thus locking them in the inactive state (cf.Fig.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
This strong and sustained Chk1/2 activation leads to stable G2 arrest.
“In p53-deficient cells, in the case of persistent telomere dysfunction, DNA damage induces strong and sustained Chk1/2 activation leading to stable G2 arrest that, via mitotic bypass, leads to endoreplication, resulting in tetraploidy.88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Active pRb inhibits expression of genes that control G2/M progression.
“Active pRb inhibits the expression of genes that control G2/M progression, leading to irreversible G2 arrest of the cell cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
This inhibition causes irreversible G2 arrest.
“Active pRb inhibits the expression of genes that control G2/M progression, leading to irreversible G2 arrest of the cell cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
p21 inhibits cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes.
“In addition to inhibiting cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes, p21 mediates premature activation of APC/C-Cdh1, leading to degradation of cyclin B1 and other mitotic regulators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Endoreplication results in tetraploidy.
“In p53-deficient cells, in the case of persistent telomere dysfunction, DNA damage induces strong and sustained Chk1/2 activation leading to stable G2 arrest that, via mitotic bypass, leads to endoreplication, resulting in tetraploidy.88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Without prolonged Chk1/2 activation, cells lacking p53 and p21 that are exposed to DNA-damaging agents arrest in G2 only briefly.
“In the absence of sustained Chk1/2 activation, p53/p21-deficient cells exposed to genotoxic agents arrest only transiently in G2 and then progress into mitosis and eventually die.59,93”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
This tetraploid G1 phase shows buildup of G1 cyclins such as cyclin D1.
“Subsequent APC/C-Cdh1-mediated degradation of cyclin B1 and other mitotic regulators precedes mitotic bypass (skip), leading to irreversible arrest (senescence) in a tetraploid (4N) G1 phase, characterized by accumulation of G1 cyclins (cyclin D1, cD1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
When p53 is functional, G2 arrest caused by DNA damage causes p21-dependent nuclear trapping of cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes.
“In p53-proficient cells, DNA damage-induced G2 arrest leads to p21-dependent nuclear sequestration of cyclin B1-Cdk1 (cB1) complexes, thus locking them in the inactive state (cf.Fig.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Mitotic bypass leads to irreversible arrest (senescence) in a tetraploid G1 phase.
“Subsequent APC/C-Cdh1-mediated degradation of cyclin B1 and other mitotic regulators precedes mitotic bypass (skip), leading to irreversible arrest (senescence) in a tetraploid (4N) G1 phase, characterized by accumulation of G1 cyclins (cyclin D1, cD1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
p21 mediates premature activation of APC/C-Cdh1.
“In addition to inhibiting cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes, p21 mediates premature activation of APC/C-Cdh1, leading to degradation of cyclin B1 and other mitotic regulators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 34
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAbsence of pRb phosphorylation, presence of G1 cyclins, and lack of mitotic cyclins are an early-recognized hallmark of senescence.
“Indeed, absence of pRb phosphorylation, 40 together with the presence of G1 cyclins (cyclins D1 and E1) 27 and the lack of mitotic cyclins (cyclin B1), 41 is an early-recognized hallmark of senescence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationContinuous Cdk-mediated inactivation of pRb family proteins is required for cell cycle progression because active pocket proteins sequester E2F factors and repress replication and division genes.
“Continuous Cdk-mediated inactivation of pRb family proteins is a prerequisite for cell cycle progression, because active (hypo-phosphorylated) pocket-proteins drive cell cycle exit by sequestering E2F family transcription factors and repressing the genes required for DNA replication and cell division.3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSenescence has also been implicated in promoting carcinogenesis and age-related pathologies through the senescence-associated secretory phenotype.
“However, senescence has also been implicated both in promoting carcinogenesis 15 and in age-related pathologies 16,17 through its autocrine and paracrine effects, known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) originally described by the Campisi group.18,19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationActivated DNA damage response markers occur in many pre-cancerous lesions, and checkpoint-compromising mutations are suggested to be required for tumor progression.
“Indeed, the markers of activated DDR are found in many pre-cancerous lesions, and mutations compromising DNA damage checkpoint (for example, defects in ATM/p53 pathway) are suggested to be a prerequisite for tumor progression.13,14”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSenescence was originally defined as an irreversible G1-phase arrest.
“Originally, cellular senescence was defined as an irreversible arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (reviewed in refs.25,26 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenp53 induces p21, which is an essential mediator of senescence.
“Following activation by panoply of stress signals, p53 induces the expression of the Cdk inhibitor p21 Waf1/Cip1 (p21), an essential mediator of senescence (see below).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitationp53 is a major target of ATM and ATR and has a pivotal role in the DNA damage response.
“p53 (TP53), which is a major target of the PI3K-related protein kinases (PI3K) ATM and ATR and that plays a pivotal role in DDR 5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationmTOR has been implicated in senescence, linking cell growth to p53 and DNA damage response pathways.
“More recently, mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin), another member of the PI3K family that controls cell growth in response to nutritional cues, has also been implicated in senescence, thus linking cellular growth with the p53 and DDR pathways.[6][7][8][9]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6][7][8][9]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSASP factors can reinforce cell-cycle arrest cell autonomously and can influence surrounding cells and immune surveillance non-cell autonomously, leading to elimination of senescent cells.
“SASP factors can act cell autonomously by reinforcing cell-cycle arrest and non-cell autonomously by influencing cells in the surrounding environment and promoting immune surveillance, leading to the elimination of senescent cells.20,12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningGenotoxic agents can induce senescence by triggering DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints that halt proliferation.
“Senescence can be also induced by genotoxic agents, which like eroded telomeres or hyperactive oncogenes, trigger the DNA damage response (DDR) pathways and activate cell cycle checkpoints to halt proliferation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCellular senescence was originally described as an irreversible arrest in G1 phase.
“Originally, cellular senescence was defined as an irreversible arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (reviewed in refs.25,26 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ Senescence from G2 arrest, revisitedThe G1 arrest of senescence is thought to result from a DNA damage response that raises p21 and p16, which block pRb phosphorylation and prevent DNA replication.
“The molecular basis of this G1 arrest is thought to be due to a DNA damage response, resulting in accumulation of the cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors p21 and p16 that block the inactivating phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor pRb, thereby preventing DNA replication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitationp16 is not required for the cell cycle arrest of replicative senescence; its late induction after p21-mediated arrest was suggested to stabilize rather than induce the senescent state.
“Unlike p21, p16 is not required for cell cycle arrest associated with replicative senescence, and its late induction, which occurs only after p21-mediated cell cycle arrest, was suggested to stabilize rather than induce the senescent state.28,42,[48][49][50]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe distribution of senescent cells is consistent with the idea that senescence limits early tumor progression and that malignancy involves escaping senescence.
“This is consistent with the hypothesis that senescence restricts tumor progression during the early stages of tumorigenesis, whereas progression to malignancy would involve evading senescence. 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSenescent cells are not merely non-dividing bystanders; their active metabolism can produce pro- or anti-tumorigenic effects depending on the microenvironment.
“Therefore, senescent cells are not merely non-dividing bystanders but, due to their active metabolism (reviewed in ref. 8 ), they can elicit pro-and/or anti-tumorigenic responses, depending on the microenvironment.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCellular senescence is a permanent cell cycle arrest with distinct metabolic activity and marked morphological changes.
“Cellular senescence is a state of permanent cell cycle arrest characterized by distinct metabolic activity and dramatic changes in cell morphology.1,2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMutations, silencing, or loss of CDKN2A facilitate senescence bypass and are frequently associated with carcinogenesis.
“In agreement with p16's role as a guardian of senescence, mutations, silencing or loss of CDKN2A, the gene encoding p16, facilitate senescence bypass and it is frequently associated with carcinogenesis (reviewed in.51,52”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoningp21 was proposed to be paramount for G2 exit because it completely and irreversibly inhibits cyclin B1-Cdk1, preventing activation by CAK, PLK1, or Cdc25 phosphatases.
“This mechanism was proposed to be paramount for cell cycle exit in G2 because, unlike transient inhibition of Cdk1 activation through the Chk1/2 pathway, p21 completely and irreversibly inhibits cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes, thus rendering impossible their activation by CAK, PLK1 or Cdc25 phosphatases (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPremature p21-dependent APC/C-Cdh1 activation in G2-arrested cells was thought to result from Emi1 downregulation, although a Cdc14B role was not formally excluded.
“This premature and p21-dependent activation of APC/C-Cdh1 in G2arrested cells was thought to be due to down-regulation of the APC/C inhibitor Emi1, 74 although an implication of the Cdc14B phosphatase in this process was not formally excluded.77”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitationp16 is dispensable for mitotic skipping and senescence induction but is required for senescence maintenance.
“The finding that p16 is dispensable both for mitotic skipping and induction of senescence, but is required for its maintenance, is in full agreement with the models proposed earlier whereby p21 is a major mediator of irreversible cell cycle arrest.28,49”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDNA damage signaling from partial telomere deprotection is insufficient to fully activate the ATM-mediated G2/M checkpoint; after mitosis, DNA damage induces p53-dependent G1 exit.
“In agreement with this hypothesis, a recent report showed that, unlike genomic breaks, DNA damage signaling elicited by partial telomere deprotection is insufficient to fully activate the ATM-mediated G2/M checkpoint.83 Instead, after completion of mitosis, DNA damage induces p53-dependent cell cycle exit in G1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDNA damage-induced G2 arrest is triggered by ATM/ATR-activated Chk1/2, which inhibit Cdc25 phosphatases that activate cyclin B1-Cdk1.
“According to the prevailing model, 56 DNA damage-induced G2 arrest is triggered by the ATM/ATR-activated checkpoint kinases Chk1/2 that inhibit Cdc25 phosphatases, which are activators of the key mitotic regulator, cyclin B1-Cdk1 (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn non-transformed cells, DNA damage-induced Chk2 phosphorylation at Thr68 is very transient and is not the best indicator of Chk2 activation.
“It should be noted that, at least in non-transformed cells, DNA damage-induced Chk2 phosphorylation at Thr68 is very transient 72 and hence not the best indicator of Chk2 activation (as opposed to SDS-PAGE shift).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent publications have confirmed earlier observations and added evidence for a G2 exit program and its role in senescence.
“Several recent publications have confirmed these old observations and provided additional evidence supporting the existence of a G2 exit program and its role in senescence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAPC/C-Cdh1 activation alone is not sufficient to induce senescence; repression of mitotic regulators by pRb family pocket proteins is also required.
“However, unlike p53-mediated mitotic bypass, APC/C Cdh1 activation alone does not appear to be sufficient to induce senescence, that additionally requires repression of mitotic regulators by pRb family pocket proteins (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe G2 exit program was proposed to act as a safeguard preventing adaptation to the G2 checkpoint and passage of damaged cells into mitosis.
“Based on these findings, it was proposed that the “G2 exit program” might serve as a safeguard mechanism to prevent cell adaptation to the G2 checkpoint and consequently the passage into mitosis of cells with damaged DNA (Fig. 2; 59 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDownregulation of mitotic regulators after G2 arrest is due both to pRb-mediated suppression and to protein degradation by APC/C-Cdh1.
“Originally, downregulation of mitotic regulators following G2 arrest was attributed to pRb-mediated suppression of their expression 64 (Fig. 2).However, subsequent work in several laboratories provided evidence that this is also due to protein degradation triggered by anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and its co-activator Cdh1 [74][75][76] (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [64] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [74][75][76]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn aging cells, telomeric DNA damage persists at a subset of the shortest telomeres and fully activates the DNA damage response, unlike functional telomeres that trigger a transient protective response in G2.
“Unlike functional telomeres that trigger a transient DNA damage response in G2 that is required for their protection, 82 telomeric DNA damage in aging cells persists at a subset of the shortest telomeres and fully activates DDR.81”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningG2-arrested fibroblasts with p53 or pRb compromised by viral oncogenes fail to exit permanently and continue expressing mitotic regulators after prolonged genotoxic exposure.
“G2arrested fibroblasts, in which either p53 or pRb was compromised by viral oncogenes, failed to permanently exit the cell cycle and expressed mitotic regulators even after prolonged exposure to genotoxic agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTetraploidization triggered by permanently damaged telomeres promotes tumorigenic transformation of mouse cells.
“Subsequent work by the same team has shown that tetraploidization triggered by permanently damaged telomeres promotes tumorigenic transformation of mouse cells. 92”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA model proposes that cells stably blocked in G2 undergo mitotic bypass into tetraploid G1, where p21-mediated inhibition of cyclin E1-Cdk2 prevents replication.
“A model originally proposed by the Lahav group suggests that cells stably blocked in G2 eventually undergo mitotic bypass -a passage from G2 to G1 without chromosome segregation -and enter a tetraploid G1 phase where they cannot replicate due to p21-mediated inhibition of cyclin E1-Cdk2.89”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationProlonged ICRF-193 exposure in normal human fibroblasts causes p53/p21-dependent irreversible G2 exit, with reduced cyclin A and B1 and accumulation of non-phosphorylated pRb family pocket proteins.
“Prolonged exposure to this drug led to p53/p21dependent irreversible cell cycle exit in G2 that was associated with down-regulation of both cyclin A and cyclin B1 and accumulation of non-phosphorylated pRb family pocket proteins.59”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationChk2 does not appear essential for G2 arrest; damaged cells more likely progress into mitosis because of inefficient Chk1 activation and/or weak p21 induction.
“A major caveat of this interpretation is that Chk2 does not seem to play an essential role in G2 arrest 84,85,72 and it is more likely that damaged cells progress into mitosis due to inefficient Chk1 activation 86 and/or lack of robust p21 induction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationReplicative senescence or various senescence-causing stimuli induce p53-dependent mitotic bypass, irreversible arrest in 4N G1, and accumulation of p16 and beta-galactosidase.
“The Nakanishi group showed that replicative senescence or exposure to various senescence-causing stimuli induces p53-dependent mitotic bypass (referred to as mitotic skipping), entailing irreversible cell cycle arrest in the 4N G1 state and accumulation of the senescent markers p16 and b-galactosidase.93”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTelomere dysfunction, oncogene hyperactivity, and several DNA-damaging agents activate the ATM/ATR DNA damage response pathway.
“Dysfunctional telomeres, hyperactive oncogenes and various genotoxic agents stimulate the ATM/ATRmediated DNA damage response (DDR) pathway.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenATM phosphorylates the p53 tumor suppressor.
“ATM also phosphorylates the p53 tumor suppressor that, by inducing the Cdk inhibitor p21 Waf1/Cip1 (p21), plays a central role in the G1 exit program (late response).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA more likely explanation is that p16 compensates for p21 loss by blocking pRb phosphorylation by cyclin D1-Cdk4/6, supporting a role for the p16-pRb pathway in senescence maintenance.
“While this hypothesis cannot be entirely dismissed, a more likely explanation is that p16 might compensate for the absence of p21 in blocking pRb phosphorylation by cyclin D1-Cdk/6 (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2), thus justifying the proposed role of the p16-pRb pathway in senescence maintenance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn U2OS cells, p21 induction is impaired by an inefficient ATM response and probably by a Wip1 phosphatase mutation that interferes with p53 activation.
“In this p53/pRb proficient cell line, p21 induction is impaired due to inefficient ATM response 72 and, probably, mutation of the Wip1 phosphatase that interferes with p53 activation.97”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationStrong persistent DNA damage signaling from POT1a/b double knockdown likely causes sustained Chk1/2 activation that prevents Cdk1 activation and mitosis, producing prolonged G2 arrest that enables mitotic bypass and a new replication round.
“The most likely explanation is that the strong and persistent DNA damage signaling induced by POT1a/b double knockdown 88 causes sustained Chk1/2 activation that prevents Cdk1 activation (and mitosis), resulting in prolonged G2 arrest.This would enable the mitotic bypass and the onset of a new round of replication (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenCyclin D1-Cdk4/6 complexes phosphorylate and inactivate pRb family pocket proteins.
“In addition to cyclin E1-Cdk2 (cE1-K2) complexes, p21 also inhibits cyclin D1-Cdk4/6 (cD1-K4/6) complexes that phosphorylate and inactivate pRb family pocket proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenSenescence is associated with p16 upregulation.
“Senescence is also associated with p16 Ink4A (p16) upregulation, but the pathways leading to its induction are not entirely elucidated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRecent publications have emphasized the importance of the G2 exit program in senescence.
“In conclusion, a flurry of papers in the last 2 y has highlighted the relevance of the G2 exit program in senescence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenp16 specifically targets Cdk4/6.
“This Cdk inhibitor specifically targets Cdk4/6 and prevents their association with D-type cyclins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitationp21 depletion prevents senescence less efficiently than p53 depletion.
“Moreover, p21 depletion prevents senescence less efficiently than p53 depletion, prompting the authors to suggest that p53 might activate the pRb family independently of p21 (Fig. 5G in ref. 93 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenCyclin E1-Cdk2 is a key regulator of the G1/S transition.
“The ATM/ATR kinases induce the early response by activating Chk1/2 checkpoint kinases that, in turn, by inhibiting Cdc25 phosphatases, prevent activation of cyclin E1-Cdk2, which is a key regulator of G1/S transition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTransient p53 induction in G2, but not G1, is sufficient to induce mitotic bypass and senescence; this is not true for p21.
“While the previously discussed works 93,95 show that transient induction of p53 in G2 (but not in G1) is sufficient to induce mitotic bypass and senescence, this is not the case for p21.93”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenCdc25 phosphatases promote mitosis by activating cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes.
“The early response involves Chk1/2-mediated inhibition of Cdc25 phosphatases, which promote mitosis by activating cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes (cB1/K1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation4N senescent cells occur in human melanocyte naevi, suggesting that the G2 exit program has a more general role in senescence.
“Importantly, this work also provided evidence for the occurrence of 4N senescent cells in human melanocyte naevi, the first in vivo senescence model, 94 suggesting that the G2 exit program has a more general role in senescence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMitotic bypass requires p53; its absence leads to aberrant mitosis and cell death.
“The results showing that mitotic bypass requires p53, as its absence leads to aberrant mitosis and cell death, corroborate the observations by the Karlseder team, 83 but they apparently contradict the finding that mitotic bypass in p53-deficient cells leads to endoreplication.88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenp16 prevents Cdk4/6 association with D-type cyclins.
“This Cdk inhibitor specifically targets Cdk4/6 and prevents their association with D-type cyclins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn old cells lacking p53 and pRb, severe telomere shortening causes crisis, widespread death, and tetraploidization via endoreplication or failed mitosis.
“Similarly, in aging p53/pRbdeficient cells, extensive telomere erosion induces crisis with massive cell death and tetraploidization through endoreplication or mitotic failure.92”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenp21 activates pRb by blocking Cdk-mediated pRb phosphorylation.
“Like in G1 arrest, p21 also activates pRb by blocking Cdk-mediated pRb phosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese cells then progress into mitosis and eventually die.
“In the absence of sustained Chk1/2 activation, p53/p21-deficient cells exposed to genotoxic agents arrest only transiently in G2 and then progress into mitosis and eventually die.59,93”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenp16 likely maintains senescence in G2 by acting on pRb kinases.
“Like in G1 arrest, p16 stabilizes senescence in G2 presumably by targeting pRb kinases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Senescent cells may also stop in G2 to block mitosis in the presence of DNA damage.
“Senescent cells may also stop in G2 to block mitosis in the presence of DNA damage [32] (Figure 1).”
From Mechanisms and Regulation of Cellular Senescence (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Unscheduled degradation of mitotic regulators is believed to result in cell cycle exit in G2.
“Their unscheduled degradation is believed to result in cell cycle exit in G2 [32].”
From Mechanisms and Regulation of Cellular Senescence (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo.
Dimri, G. P., Lee, X., Basile, G., Acosta, M., Scott, G., Roskelley, C., Medrano, E. E., Linskens, M., Rubelj, I., & Pereira-Smith, O. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.20.9363 · Cited by 7,477 · see citing works
Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a
Serrano, M., Lin, A. W., McCurrach, M. E., Beach, D., & Lowe, S. W. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81902-9 · Cited by 5,178 · see citing works
Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders
Baker, D. J., Wijshake, T., Tchkonia, T., LeBrasseur, N. K., Childs, B. G., van de Sluis, B., Kirkland, J. L., & van Deursen, J. M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10600 · Cited by 3,670 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Together with b-galactosidase staining,(45) p16 is increasingly used as a senescence biomarker.(16,46,47) However, despite sharing common targets, the 2 Cdk inhibitors have distinct functions and biological roles.”
BackgroundA DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence
Fagagna, F. D. D., Reaper, P. M., Clay-Farrace, L., Fiegler, H., Carr, P., von Zglinicki, T., Saretzki, G., Carter, N. P., & Jackson, S. P. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02118 · Cited by 2,855 · see citing works
Requirement for p53 and p21 to Sustain G <sub>2</sub> Arrest After DNA Damage
Bunz, F., Dutriaux, A., Lengauer, C., Waldman, T., Zhou, S., Brown, J. P., Sedivy, J. M., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5393.1497 · Cited by 2,803 · see citing works
p21 in cancer: Intricate networks and multiple activities
Abbas, T., & Dutta, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2657 · Cited by 2,712 · see citing works
DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis
Bartkova, J., Hořejší, Z., Koed, K., Krämer, A., Tort, F., Zieger, K., Guldberg, P., Sehested, M., Nesland, J. M., Lukas, C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03482 · Cited by 2,688 · see citing works
Senescence and tumour clearance is triggered by p53 restoration in murine liver carcinomas
Xue, W., Zender, L., Miething, C., Dickins, R. A., Hernando, E., Krizhanovsky, V., Cordon-Cardo, C., & Lowe, S. W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05529 · Cited by 2,473 · see citing works
BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi
Michaloglou, C., Vredeveld, L. C. W., Soengas, M. S., Denoyelle, C., Kuilman, T., van der Horst, C. M. A. M., Majoor, D. M., Shay, J. W., Mooi, W. J., & Peeper, D. S. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03890 · Cited by 2,160 · see citing works
Visualizing Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Multicellular Cell-Cycle Progression
Sakaue-Sawano, A., Kurokawa, H., Morimura, T., Hanyu, A., Hama, H., Osawa, H., Kashiwagi, S., Fukami, K., Miyata, T., Miyoshi, H., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.033 · Cited by 2,123 · see citing works
The essence of senescence: Figure 1.
Kuilman, T., Michaloglou, C., Mooi, W. J., & Peeper, D. S. (2010) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1971610 · Cited by 2,038 · see citing works
Senescence of activated stellate cells limits liver fibrosis
Krizhanovsky, V., Yon, M., Dickins, R. A., Hearn, S., Simon, J., Miething, C., Yee, H., Zender, L., & Lowe, S. W. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.049 · Cited by 2,029 · see citing works
Senescence of Activated Stellate Cells Limits Liver Fibrosis
Krizhanovsky, V., Yon, M., Dickins, R. A., Hearn, S., Simon, J., Miething, C., Yee, H., Zender, L., & Lowe, S. W. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.015 · Cited by 2,027
Four faces of cellular senescence
Rodier, F., & Campisi, J. (2011) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201009094 · Cited by 2,016 · cited 2× · see citing works
“SASP factors can act cell autonomously by reinforcing cell-cycle arrest and non-cell autonomously by influencing cells in the surrounding environment and promoting immune surveillance, leading to the elimination of senescent cells.(20,12) While in some cases, SASP factors secreted by pre-malignant senescent cells lead…”
BackgroundActivation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions
Gorgoulis, V. G., Vassiliou, L.-V. F., Karakaidos, P., Zacharatos, P., Kotsinas, A., Liloglou, T., Venere, M., DiTullio, R. A., Kastrinakis, N. G., Levy, B., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03485 · Cited by 2,009 · see citing works
Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints
Bartkova, J., Rezaei, N., Liontos, M., Karakaidos, P., Kletsas, D., Issaeva, N., Vassiliou, L.-V. F., Kolettas, E., Niforou, K., Zoumpourlis, V. C., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05268 · Cited by 1,986 · see citing works
Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases
Abraham, R. T. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.914401 · Cited by 1,966 · see citing works
Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication
Di Micco, R., Fumagalli, M., Cicalese, A., Piccinin, S., Gasparini, P., Luise, C., Schurra, C., Garre’, M., Giovanni Nuciforo, P., Bensimon, A., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05327 · Cited by 1,821 · see citing works
Krtolica, A., Parrinello, S., Lockett, S., Desprez, P.-Y., & Campisi, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.211053698 · Cited by 1,730 · see citing works
Senescence surveillance of pre-malignant hepatocytes limits liver cancer development
Kang, T.-W., Yevsa, T., Woller, N., Hoenicke, L., Wuestefeld, T., Dauch, D., Hohmeyer, A., Gereke, M., Rudalska, R., Potapova, A., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10599 · Cited by 1,621 · see citing works
Ink4a/Arf expression is a biomarker of aging
Krishnamurthy, J., Torrice, C., Ramsey, M. R., Kovalev, G. I., Al-Regaiey, K., Su, L., & Sharpless, N. E. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci22475 · Cited by 1,486 · see citing works
Dulić, V., Kaufmann, W. K., Wilson, S. J., Tisty, T. D., Lees, E., Harper, J. W., Elledge, S. J., & Reed, S. I. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90379-4 · Cited by 1,465 · see citing works
Self-citationReversal of human cellular senescence: roles of the p53 and p16 pathways
Beauséjour, C. M., Krtolica, A., Galimi, F., Narita, M., Lowe, S. W., Yaswen, P., & Campisi, J. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg417 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Programmed cell senescence during mammalian embryonic development
Muñoz-Espín, D., Cañamero, M., Maraver, A., Gómez-López, G., Contreras, J., Murillo-Cuesta, S., Rodríguez-Baeza, A., Varela-Nieto, I., Ruberte, J., Collado, M., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.019 · Cited by 1,428 · see citing works
Herbig, U., Jobling, W. A., Chen, B. P. C., Chen, D. J., & Sedivy, J. M. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00256-4 · Cited by 1,344 · see citing works
Senescence is a developmental mechanism that contributes to embryonic growth and patterning
Storer, M., Mas, A., Robert-Moreno, A., Pecoraro, M., Ortells, M. C., Di Giacomo, V., Yosef, R., Pilpel, N., Krizhanovsky, V., Sharpe, J., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.041 · Cited by 1,186 · see citing works
Living on a break: cellular senescence as a DNA-damage response
d'Adda di Fagagna, F. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2440 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Ren, B., Cam, H., Takahashi, Y., Volkert, T., Terragni, J., Young, R. A., & Dynlacht, B. D. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.949802 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
Senescence in tumours: evidence from mice and humans
Collado, M., & Serrano, M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2772 · Cited by 1,124 · see citing works
Living with or without cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases
Sherr, C. J., & Roberts, J. M. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1256504 · Cited by 1,089 · see citing works
Harbour, J. W., Luo, R. X., Santi, A. D., Postigo, A. A., & Dean, D. C. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81519-6 · Cited by 1,057 · see citing works
Alcorta, D. A., Xiong, Y., Phelps, D., Hannon, G., Beach, D., & Barrett, J. C. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13742 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Jun, J.-I., & Lau, L. F. (2010) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2070 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
Cellular mechanisms of tumour suppression by the retinoblastoma gene
Burkhart, D. L., & Sage, J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2399 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Ataxia-telangiectasia: from a rare disorder to a paradigm for cell signalling and cancer
Lavin, M. F. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2514 · Cited by 901 · see citing works
14-3-3σ is required to prevent mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage
Chan, T. A., Hermeking, H., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44188 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Stein, G. H., Drullinger, L. F., Soulard, A., & Dulić, V. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.3.2109 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
Self-citationCellular senescence and its effector programs
Salama, R., Sadaie, M., Hoare, M., & Narita, M. (2014) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.235184.113 · Cited by 855 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Cellular senescence is a state of permanent cell cycle arrest characterized by distinct metabolic activity and dramatic changes in cell morphology.(1,2) Originally, its causes were proposed to be due to physiological erosion of telomeres that occurs upon extended cell proliferation (replicative senescence), as well as…”
BackgroundRegulation of the INK4b–ARF–INK4a tumour suppressor locus: all for one or one for all
Gil, J., & Peters, G. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1987 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Uncoupling of S phase and mitosis induced by anticancer agents in cells lacking p21
Waldman, T., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381713a0 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Spencer, S. L., Cappell, S. D., Tsai, F., Overton, K. W., Wang, C. L., & Meyer, T. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.062 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction
Löbrich, M., & Jeggo, P. A. (2007) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2248 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Replicative Senescence: Implications for in Vivo Aging and Tumor Suppression
Smith, J. R., & Pereira-Smith, O. M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5271.63 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Cyclin E in normal and neoplastic cell cycles
Hwang, H. C., & Clurman, B. E. (2005) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208613 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
p53 and E2f: partners in life and death
Polager, S., & Ginsberg, D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2718 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Characterization of the p53-Dependent Postmitotic Checkpoint following Spindle Disruption
Lanni, J. S., & Jacks, T. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.2.1055 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
The Causes and Consequences of Polyploidy in Normal Development and Cancer
Davoli, T., & de Lange, T. (2011) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154234 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Monitoring Tumorigenesis and Senescence In Vivo with a p16INK4a-Luciferase Model
Burd, C. E., Sorrentino, J. A., Clark, K. S., Darr, D. B., Krishnamurthy, J., Deal, A. M., Bardeesy, N., Castrillon, D. H., Beach, D. H., & Sharpless, N. E. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.010 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
The DNA damage signaling pathway is a critical mediator of oncogene-induced senescence
Mallette, F. A., Gaumont-Leclerc, M.-F., & Ferbeyre, G. (2007) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1487307 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
The Cdc14B-Cdh1-Plk1 Axis Controls the G2 DNA-Damage-Response Checkpoint
Bassermann, F., Frescas, D., Guardavaccaro, D., Busino, L., Peschiaroli, A., & Pagano, M. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.043 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Dissecting the Unique Role of the Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor during Cellular Senescence
Chicas, A., Wang, X., Zhang, C., McCurrach, M., Zhao, Z., Mert, O., Dickins, R. A., Narita, M., Zhang, M., & Lowe, S. W. (2010) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.01.023 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Failure to Phosphorylate the Retinoblastoma Gene Product in Senescent Human Fibroblasts
Stein, G. H., Beeson, M., & Gordon, L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2166342 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Nuclear Accumulation of p21 Cip1 at the Onset of Mitosis: a Role at the G 2 /M-Phase Transition
Dulić, V., Stein, G. H., Far, D. F., & Reed, S. I. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.1.546 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Self-citationHealing and Hurting: Molecular Mechanisms, Functions, and Pathologies of Cellular Senescence
Adams, P. D. (2009) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.021 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Coppé, J.-P., Patil, C. K., Rodier, F., Sun, Y., Muñoz, D. P., Goldstein, J., Nelson, P. S., Desprez, P.-Y., & Campisi, J. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060301 · Cited by 302 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, senescence has also been implicated both in promoting carcinogenesis(15) and in age-related pathologies(16,17) through its autocrine and paracrine effects, known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) originally described by the Campisi group.(18,19) SASP factors can act cell autonomously by…”
BackgroundPersistent Telomere Damage Induces Bypass of Mitosis and Tetraploidy
Davoli, T., Denchi, E. L., & de Lange, T. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.031 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Witkiewicz, A. K., Knudsen, K. E., Dicker, A. P., & Knudsen, E. S. (2011) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.10.15.16776 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Functional Human Telomeres Are Recognized as DNA Damage in G2 of the Cell Cycle
Verdun, R. E., Crabbe, L., Haggblom, C., & Karlseder, J. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.09.024 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Dulić, V, Drullinger, L. F., Lees, E., Reed, S. I., & Stein, G. H. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.23.11034 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Self-citationParadoxical suppression of cellular senescence by p53
Demidenko, Z. N., Korotchkina, L. G., Gudkov, A. V., & Blagosklonny, M. V. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002298107 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Davoli, T., & de Lange, T. (2012) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.044 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
p21 Inhibits Thr161 Phosphorylation of Cdc2 to Enforce the G2 DNA Damage Checkpoint
Smits, V. A. J., Klompmaker, R., Vallenius, T., Rijksen, G., Mäkelä, T. P., & Medema, R. H. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m005437200 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
p21-Mediated Nuclear Retention of Cyclin B1-Cdk1 in Response to Genotoxic Stress
Charrier-Savournin, F. B., Château, M.-T., Gire, V., Sedivy, J., Piette, J., & Dulić, V. (2004) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e03-12-0871 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationDNA damage checkpoint kinase Chk2 triggers replicative senescence
Gire, V., Roux, P., Wynford‐Thomas, D., Brondello, J., & Dulic, V. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600259 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationTransient Activation of p53 in G2 Phase Is Sufficient to Induce Senescence
Krenning, L., Feringa, F. M., Shaltiel, I. A., van den Berg, J., & Medema, R. H. (2014) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.007 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Senescent cells fail to express cdc2, cycA, and cycB in response to mitogen stimulation.
Stein, G. H., Drullinger, L. F., Robetorye, R. S., Pereira-Smith, O. M., & Smith, J. R. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.24.11012 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Necessary and Sufficient Role for a Mitosis Skip in Senescence Induction
Johmura, Y., Shimada, M., Misaki, T., Naiki-Ito, A., Miyoshi, H., Motoyama, N., Ohtani, N., Hara, E., Nakamura, M., Morita, A., et al. (2014) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.003 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Gain-of-function mutations of PPM1D/Wip1 impair the p53-dependent G1 checkpoint
Kleiblova, P., Shaltiel, I. A., Benada, J., Ševčík, J., Pecháčková, S., Pohlreich, P., Voest, E. E., Dundr, P., Bartek, J., Kleibl, Z., et al. (2013) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201210031 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Stewart, Z. A., Leach, S. D., & Pietenpol, J. A. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.1.205 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
p53 Regulation of G <sub>2</sub> Checkpoint Is Retinoblastoma Protein Dependent
Flatt, P. M., Tang, L. J., Scatena, C. D., Szak, S. T., & Pietenpol, J. A. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.12.4210-4223.2000 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
The Telomere Deprotection Response Is Functionally Distinct from the Genomic DNA Damage Response
Cesare, A. J., Hayashi, M. T., Crabbe, L., & Karlseder, J. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.006 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
The Chk2 Tumor Suppressor Is Not Required for p53 Responses in Human Cancer Cells
Jallepalli, P. V., Lengauer, C., Vogelstein, B., & Bunz, F. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m213159200 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Permanent cell cycle exit in G2 phase after DNA damage in normal human fibroblasts
Baus, F., Gire, V., Fisher, D., Piette, J., & Dulić, V. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg387 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationOrigins of G<sub>1</sub> arrest in senescent human fibroblasts
Stein, G. H., & Dulić, V. (1995) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.950170610 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationReplicatively senescent cells are arrested in G1 and G2 phases
Mao, Z., Ke, Z., Gorbunova, V., & Seluanov, A. (2012) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.100467 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Attenuation of TORC1 signaling delays replicative and oncogenic RAS-induced senescence
Kolesnichenko, M., Hong, L., Liao, R., Vogt, P. K., & Sun, P. (2012) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.20683 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The G<sub>2</sub> Checkpoint Is Maintained by Redundant Pathways
Passalaris, T. M., Benanti, J. A., Gewin, L., Kiyono, T., & Galloway, D. A. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.9.5872 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Distinct mechanisms act in concert to mediate cell cycle arrest
Toettcher, J. E., Loewer, A., Ostheimer, G. J., Yaffe, M. B., Tidor, B., & Lahav, G. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806196106 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Gong, Y., & de Lange, T. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.016 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Questioning the Role of Checkpoint Kinase 2 in the p53 DNA Damage Response
Ahn, J., Urist, M., & Prives, C. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m213185200 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Hasty, P., Sharp, Z. D., Curiel, T. J., & Campisi, J. (2012) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.22912 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Jackson, M. W., Agarwal, M. K., Yang, J., Bruss, P., Uchiumi, T., Agarwal, M. L., Stark, G. R., & Taylor (2005) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.02307 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Hyper-mitogenic drive coexists with mitotic incompetence in senescent cells
Leontieva, O. V., Lenzo, F. L., Demidenko, Z. N., & Blagosklonny, M. V. (2012) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.22937 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Wei, W., Herbig, U., Wei, S., Dutriaux, A., & Sedivy, J. M. (2003) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400001 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Müllers, E., Cascales, H. S., Jaiswal, H., Saurin, A. T., & Lindqvist, A. (2014) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/15384101.2015.945831 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
p21Cip1/WAF1mediates cyclin B1 degradation in response to DNA damage
Gillis, L. D., Leidal, A. M., Hill, R., & Lee, P. W. K. (2009) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.8.2.7550 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Lossaint, G., Besnard, E., Fisher, D., Piette, J., & Dulić, V (2011) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2011.135 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationThe G2 DNA Damage Checkpoint Delays Expression of Genes Encoding Mitotic Regulators
Crawford, D. F., & Piwnica-Worms, H. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m103414200 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Wiebusch, L., & Hagemeier, C. (2010) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2010.99 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Winters, Z., Ongkeko, W. M., Harris, A. L., & Norbury, C. J. (1998) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1201991 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
DNA Damage Triggers p21<sup>WAF1</sup>-dependent Emi1 Down-Regulation That Maintains G2 Arrest
Lee, J., Kim, J. A., Barbier, V., Fotedar, A., & Fotedar, R. (2009) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e08-08-0818 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Mitogen requirement for cell cycle progression in the absence of pocket protein activity
Foijer, F., Wolthuis, R. M. F., Doodeman, V., Medema, R. H., & te Riele, H. (2005) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.10.021 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Ye, C., Zhang, X., Wan, J., Chang, L., Hu, W., Bing, Z., Zhang, S., Li, J., He, J., Wang, J., et al. (2013) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.24528 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Dulic, V. (2013) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-239-1_2 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Chassot, A., Lossaint, G., Turchi, L., Meneguzzi, G., Fisher, D., Ponzio, G., & Dulić, V. (2008) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.7.13.6233 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationEroded human telomeres are more prone to remain uncapped and to trigger a G2 checkpoint response
Jullien, L., Mestre, M., Roux, P., & Gire, V. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1121 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationDysfunctional Telomeres at Senescence Signal Cell Cycle Arrest via Chk2
Gire, V. (2004) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.3.10.1167 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Waldman T, 1995, Cancer Res, 55, 5187
- Sandhu C, 2000, Cancer Res, 60, 2616
- Levedakou EN, 1995, Cancer Res, 55, 2500
- Andreassen PR, 2001, Cancer Res, 61, 7660
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cellular senescence: the good, the bad and the unknown
Huang, W., Hickson, L. J., Eirin, A., Kirkland, J. L., & Lerman, L. O. (2022) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-022-00601-z · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Forging a signature of in vivo senescence
Sharpless, N. E., & Sherr, C. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3960 · Cited by 1,104 · see citing works
Senescent cell clearance by the immune system: Emerging therapeutic opportunities
Prata, L. G. P. L., Ovsyannikova, I. G., Tchkonia, T., & Kirkland, J. L. (2018) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2019.04.003 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Mechanisms and Regulation of Cellular Senescence
Roger, L., Tomas, F., & Gire, V. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222313173 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Self-citationNuclear morphology is a deep learning biomarker of cellular senescence
Heckenbach, I., Mkrtchyan, G. V., Ezra, M. B., Bakula, D., Madsen, J. S., Nielsen, M. H., Oró, D., Osborne, B., Covarrubias, A. J., Idda, M. L., et al. (2022) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00263-3 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Inflammation and DNA damage: cause, effect or both
Pezone, A., Olivieri, F., Napoli, M. V., Procopio, A., Avvedimento, E. V., & Gabrielli, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-022-00905-1 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Immunometabolism in the development of rheumatoid arthritis
Weyand, C. M., & Goronzy, J. J. (2020) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12838 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
The Cancer SENESCopedia: A delineation of cancer cell senescence
Jochems, F., Thijssen, B., De Conti, G., Jansen, R., Pogacar, Z., Groot, K., Wang, L., Schepers, A., Wang, C., Jin, H., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109441 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Cellular senescence in the aging and diseased kidney
Valentijn, F. A., Falke, L. L., Nguyen, T. Q., & Goldschmeding, R. (2018) · Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1007/s12079-017-0434-2 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Residual Cdk1/2 activity after DNA damage promotes senescence
Müllers, E., Silva Cascales, H., Burdova, K., Macurek, L., & Lindqvist, A. (2017) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.12588 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Novoa, B., Pereiro, P., López‐Muñoz, A., Varela, M., Forn‐Cuní, G., Anchelin, M., Dios, S., Romero, A., Martinez‐López, A., Medina‐Gali, R. M., et al. (2019) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.13020 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Distinct senotypes in p16- and p21-positive cells across human and mouse aging tissues
Saul, D., Jurk, D., Doolittle, M. L., Kosinsky, R. L., Han, Y., Zhang, X., Franco, A. C., Kim, S. Y., Wyles, S. P., Prakash, Y. S., et al. (2025) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/s44318-025-00601-2 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gire, V., & Dulić, V.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Dulić, Vjekoslav
- Venue
- Cell Cycle
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-02-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-304
- ISSN
- 1538-4101 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-4005
- PMC
- PMC4353294
- OpenAlex
- W1536843121
- Semantic Scholar
- 8b9deb6f2b2b47e41e32f456120981b29be98434
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cell Cycle (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Keywords
- cellular senescence, G2 cell cycle arrest, DNA damage response, p21, p16, retinoblastoma protein, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, telomere shortening, cell cycle arrest
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Models, Biological, Signal Transduction, G1 Phase, Cellular Senescence, Cell Proliferation, G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review