The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatiotemporal Control of Type III-A CRISPR-Cas Immunity: Coupling DNA Degradation with the Target RNA Recognition
Abstract
Streptococcus thermophilus (St) type III-A CRISPR-Cas system restricts MS2 RNA phage and cuts RNA in vitro. However, the CRISPR array spacers match DNA phages, raising the question: does the St CRISPR-Cas system provide immunity by erasing phage mRNA or/and by eliminating invading DNA? We show that it does both. We find that (1) base-pairing between crRNA and target RNA activates single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) degradation by StCsm; (2) ssDNase activity is confined to the HD-domain of Cas10; (3) target RNA cleavage by the Csm3 RNase suppresses Cas10 DNase activity, ensuring temporal control of DNA degradation; and (4) base-pairing between crRNA 5'-handle and target RNA 3'-flanking sequence inhibits Cas10 ssDNase to prevent self-targeting. We propose that upon phage infection, crRNA-guided StCsm binding to the emerging transcript recruits Cas10 DNase to the actively transcribed phage DNA, resulting in degradation of both the transcript and phage DNA, but not the host DNA.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Type III-A and type III-B share the signature protein Cas10 and are unique in relation to other interference mechanisms because they target both RNA and DNA substrates.
“Type III-A and type III-B share in common the signature protein of type III systems, Cas10, and are unique in relation to other interference mechanisms because they target both RNA and DNA substrates [48,49].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Barnes, 2015, Crystal structure of a transcribing RNA polymerase II complex reveals a complete transcription bubble, Mol. Cell, 59, 258, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.034 · DOI
- Benda, 2014, Structural model of a CRISPR RNA-silencing complex reveals the RNA-target cleavage activity in Cmr4, Mol. Cell, 56, 43, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.002 · DOI
- Deng, 2013, A novel interference mechanism by a type IIIB CRISPR-Cmr module in Sulfolobus, Mol. Microbiol., 87, 1088, 10.1111/mmi.12152 · DOI
- Elmore, 2016, Bipartite recognition of target RNAs activates DNA cleavage by the type III-B CRISPR-Cas system, Genes Dev., 30, 447, 10.1101/gad.272153.115 · DOI
- Estrella, 2016, RNA-activated DNA cleavage by the type III-B CRISPR-Cas effector complex, Genes Dev., 30, 460, 10.1101/gad.273722.115 · DOI
- Gasiunas, 2012, Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, E2579, 10.1073/pnas.1208507109 · DOI · Paper page
- Gasiunas, 2014, Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated microbial immunity, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 71, 449, 10.1007/s00018-013-1438-6 · DOI
- Goldberg, 2014, Conditional tolerance of temperate phages via transcription-dependent CRISPR-Cas targeting, Nature, 514, 633, 10.1038/nature13637 · DOI
- Hale, 2014, Target RNA capture and cleavage by the Cmr type III-B CRISPR-Cas effector complex, Genes Dev., 28, 2432, 10.1101/gad.250712.114 · DOI
- Hatoum-Aslan, 2014, Genetic characterization of antiplasmid immunity through a type III-A CRISPR-Cas system, J. Bacteriol., 196, 310, 10.1128/JB.01130-13 · DOI
- Jackson, 2014, Structural biology. Crystal structure of the CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex from Escherichia coli, Science, 345, 1473, 10.1126/science.1256328 · DOI
- Jung, 2015, Crystal structure of the Csm1 subunit of the Csm complex and its single-stranded DNA-specific nuclease activity, Structure, 23, 782, 10.1016/j.str.2015.01.021 · DOI
- Lasa, 2011, Genome-wide antisense transcription drives mRNA processing in bacteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 20172, 10.1073/pnas.1113521108 · DOI
- Lillestøl, 2009, CRISPR families of the crenarchaeal genus Sulfolobus: bidirectional transcription and dynamic properties, Mol. Microbiol., 72, 259, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06641.x · DOI
- Makarova, 2015, An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 13, 722, 10.1038/nrmicro3569 · DOI · Paper page
- Marraffini, 2008, CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA, Science, 322, 1843, 10.1126/science.1165771 · DOI · Paper page
- Marraffini, 2010, Self versus non-self discrimination during CRISPR RNA-directed immunity, Nature, 463, 568, 10.1038/nature08703 · DOI
- Movahedi, 2015, RNA-directed DNA methylation in plants, Plant Cell Rep., 34, 1857, 10.1007/s00299-015-1839-0 · DOI
- Mulepati, 2014, Structural biology. Crystal structure of a CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex bound to a ssDNA target, Science, 345, 1479, 10.1126/science.1256996 · DOI
- Osawa, 2015, Crystal structure of the CRISPR-Cas RNA silencing Cmr complex bound to a target analog, Mol. Cell, 58, 418, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Peng, 2015, An archaeal CRISPR type III-B system exhibiting distinctive RNA targeting features and mediating dual RNA and DNA interference, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 406, 10.1093/nar/gku1302 · DOI
- Ramia, 2014, Essential structural and functional roles of the Cmr4 subunit in RNA cleavage by the Cmr CRISPR-Cas complex, Cell Rep., 9, 1610, 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.007 · DOI
- Ramia, 2014, Staphylococcus epidermidis Csm1 is a 3′-5′ exonuclease, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 1129, 10.1093/nar/gkt914 · DOI
- Samai, 2015, Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA cleavage during type III CRISPR-Cas immunity, Cell, 161, 1164, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.027 · DOI · Paper page
- Sinkunas, 2011, Cas3 is a single-stranded DNA nuclease and ATP-dependent helicase in the CRISPR/Cas immune system, EMBO J., 30, 1335, 10.1038/emboj.2011.41 · DOI
- Staals, 2013, Structure and activity of the RNA-targeting type III-B CRISPR-Cas complex of Thermus thermophilus, Mol. Cell, 52, 135, 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.013 · DOI
- Sternberg, 2014, DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9, Nature, 507, 62, 10.1038/nature13011 · DOI · Paper page
- Szczelkun, 2014, Direct observation of R-loop formation by single RNA-guided Cas9 and Cascade effector complexes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 9798, 10.1073/pnas.1402597111 · DOI
- Tamulaitis, 2014, Programmable RNA shredding by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Streptococcus thermophilus, Mol. Cell, 56, 506, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.027 · DOI
- Wang, 1997, Nuclease cleavage of the upstream half of the nontemplate strand DNA in an Escherichia coli transcription elongation complex causes upstream translocation and transcriptional arrest, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 5989, 10.1074/jbc.272.9.5989 · DOI
- Westra, 2012, CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3, Mol. Cell, 46, 595, 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.018 · DOI
- Zhang, 2012, Structure and mechanism of the CMR complex for CRISPR-mediated antiviral immunity, Mol. Cell, 45, 303, 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.013 · DOI
- Zhao, 2014, Crystal structure of the RNA-guided immune surveillance Cascade complex in Escherichia coli, Nature, 515, 147, 10.1038/nature13733 · DOI
- Zhu, 2015, Cmr4 is the slicer in the RNA-targeting Cmr CRISPR complex, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 1257, 10.1093/nar/gku1355 · DOI
- Zuo, 2015, Crystal structures of the E. coli transcription initiation complexes with a complete bubble, Mol. Cell, 58, 534, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.010 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CRISPR-Based Technologies: Impact of RNA-Targeting Systems
Terns, M. P. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.09.018 · Cited by 168
Type III CRISPR-Cas immunity: major differences brushed aside
Tamulaitis, G., Venclovas, Č., & Siksnys, V. (2017) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.012 · Cited by 126
Self-citationLoureiro, A., & da Silva, G. J. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010018 · Cited by 129
RNA-Targeting CRISPR-Cas systems and their applications
Burmistrz, M., Krakowski, K., & Krawczyk-Balska, A. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21031122 · Cited by 125
Structural basis of CRISPR-Cas Type III prokaryotic defence systems
Molina, R., Sofos, N., & Montoya, G. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2020.06.010 · Cited by 48
Guo, T., Zheng, F., Zeng, Z., Yang, Y., Li, Q., She, Q., & Han, W. (2019) · RNA Biology · doi:10.1080/15476286.2019.1642725 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazlauskiene, M., Tamulaitis, G., Kostiuk, G., Venclovas, Č., & Siksnys, V.
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-306
- ISSN
- 1097-2765
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 385 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Funders
- Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba (MIP-40/2013)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review