Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatiotemporal Control of Type III-A CRISPR-Cas Immunity: Coupling DNA Degradation with the Target RNA Recognition

Kazlauskiene, Migle, Tamulaitis, Gintautas, Kostiuk, Georgij, Venclovas, Česlovas, Siksnys, Virginijus·2016·Molecular Cell

Abstract

Streptococcus thermophilus (St) type III-A CRISPR-Cas system restricts MS2 RNA phage and cuts RNA in vitro. However, the CRISPR array spacers match DNA phages, raising the question: does the St CRISPR-Cas system provide immunity by erasing phage mRNA or/and by eliminating invading DNA? We show that it does both. We find that (1) base-pairing between crRNA and target RNA activates single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) degradation by StCsm; (2) ssDNase activity is confined to the HD-domain of Cas10; (3) target RNA cleavage by the Csm3 RNase suppresses Cas10 DNase activity, ensuring temporal control of DNA degradation; and (4) base-pairing between crRNA 5'-handle and target RNA 3'-flanking sequence inhibits Cas10 ssDNase to prevent self-targeting. We propose that upon phage infection, crRNA-guided StCsm binding to the emerging transcript recruits Cas10 DNase to the actively transcribed phage DNA, resulting in degradation of both the transcript and phage DNA, but not the host DNA.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Type III-A and type III-B share the signature protein Cas10 and are unique in relation to other interference mechanisms because they target both RNA and DNA substrates.

    “Type III-A and type III-B share in common the signature protein of type III systems, Cas10, and are unique in relation to other interference mechanisms because they target both RNA and DNA substrates [48,49].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Barnes, 2015, Crystal structure of a transcribing RNA polymerase II complex reveals a complete transcription bubble, Mol. Cell, 59, 258, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.034 · DOI
  2. Benda, 2014, Structural model of a CRISPR RNA-silencing complex reveals the RNA-target cleavage activity in Cmr4, Mol. Cell, 56, 43, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.002 · DOI
  3. Deng, 2013, A novel interference mechanism by a type IIIB CRISPR-Cmr module in Sulfolobus, Mol. Microbiol., 87, 1088, 10.1111/mmi.12152 · DOI
  4. Elmore, 2016, Bipartite recognition of target RNAs activates DNA cleavage by the type III-B CRISPR-Cas system, Genes Dev., 30, 447, 10.1101/gad.272153.115 · DOI
  5. Estrella, 2016, RNA-activated DNA cleavage by the type III-B CRISPR-Cas effector complex, Genes Dev., 30, 460, 10.1101/gad.273722.115 · DOI
  6. Gasiunas, 2012, Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, E2579, 10.1073/pnas.1208507109 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gasiunas, 2014, Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated microbial immunity, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 71, 449, 10.1007/s00018-013-1438-6 · DOI
  8. Goldberg, 2014, Conditional tolerance of temperate phages via transcription-dependent CRISPR-Cas targeting, Nature, 514, 633, 10.1038/nature13637 · DOI
  9. Hale, 2014, Target RNA capture and cleavage by the Cmr type III-B CRISPR-Cas effector complex, Genes Dev., 28, 2432, 10.1101/gad.250712.114 · DOI
  10. Hatoum-Aslan, 2014, Genetic characterization of antiplasmid immunity through a type III-A CRISPR-Cas system, J. Bacteriol., 196, 310, 10.1128/JB.01130-13 · DOI
  11. Jackson, 2014, Structural biology. Crystal structure of the CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex from Escherichia coli, Science, 345, 1473, 10.1126/science.1256328 · DOI
  12. Jung, 2015, Crystal structure of the Csm1 subunit of the Csm complex and its single-stranded DNA-specific nuclease activity, Structure, 23, 782, 10.1016/j.str.2015.01.021 · DOI
  13. Lasa, 2011, Genome-wide antisense transcription drives mRNA processing in bacteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 20172, 10.1073/pnas.1113521108 · DOI
  14. Lillestøl, 2009, CRISPR families of the crenarchaeal genus Sulfolobus: bidirectional transcription and dynamic properties, Mol. Microbiol., 72, 259, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06641.x · DOI
  15. Makarova, 2015, An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 13, 722, 10.1038/nrmicro3569 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Marraffini, 2008, CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA, Science, 322, 1843, 10.1126/science.1165771 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Marraffini, 2010, Self versus non-self discrimination during CRISPR RNA-directed immunity, Nature, 463, 568, 10.1038/nature08703 · DOI
  18. Movahedi, 2015, RNA-directed DNA methylation in plants, Plant Cell Rep., 34, 1857, 10.1007/s00299-015-1839-0 · DOI
  19. Mulepati, 2014, Structural biology. Crystal structure of a CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex bound to a ssDNA target, Science, 345, 1479, 10.1126/science.1256996 · DOI
  20. Osawa, 2015, Crystal structure of the CRISPR-Cas RNA silencing Cmr complex bound to a target analog, Mol. Cell, 58, 418, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.018 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Peng, 2015, An archaeal CRISPR type III-B system exhibiting distinctive RNA targeting features and mediating dual RNA and DNA interference, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 406, 10.1093/nar/gku1302 · DOI
  22. Ramia, 2014, Essential structural and functional roles of the Cmr4 subunit in RNA cleavage by the Cmr CRISPR-Cas complex, Cell Rep., 9, 1610, 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.007 · DOI
  23. Ramia, 2014, Staphylococcus epidermidis Csm1 is a 3′-5′ exonuclease, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 1129, 10.1093/nar/gkt914 · DOI
  24. Samai, 2015, Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA cleavage during type III CRISPR-Cas immunity, Cell, 161, 1164, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.027 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Sinkunas, 2011, Cas3 is a single-stranded DNA nuclease and ATP-dependent helicase in the CRISPR/Cas immune system, EMBO J., 30, 1335, 10.1038/emboj.2011.41 · DOI
  26. Staals, 2013, Structure and activity of the RNA-targeting type III-B CRISPR-Cas complex of Thermus thermophilus, Mol. Cell, 52, 135, 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.013 · DOI
  27. Sternberg, 2014, DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9, Nature, 507, 62, 10.1038/nature13011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Szczelkun, 2014, Direct observation of R-loop formation by single RNA-guided Cas9 and Cascade effector complexes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 9798, 10.1073/pnas.1402597111 · DOI
  29. Tamulaitis, 2014, Programmable RNA shredding by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Streptococcus thermophilus, Mol. Cell, 56, 506, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.027 · DOI
  30. Wang, 1997, Nuclease cleavage of the upstream half of the nontemplate strand DNA in an Escherichia coli transcription elongation complex causes upstream translocation and transcriptional arrest, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 5989, 10.1074/jbc.272.9.5989 · DOI
  31. Westra, 2012, CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3, Mol. Cell, 46, 595, 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.018 · DOI
  32. Zhang, 2012, Structure and mechanism of the CMR complex for CRISPR-mediated antiviral immunity, Mol. Cell, 45, 303, 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.013 · DOI
  33. Zhao, 2014, Crystal structure of the RNA-guided immune surveillance Cascade complex in Escherichia coli, Nature, 515, 147, 10.1038/nature13733 · DOI
  34. Zhu, 2015, Cmr4 is the slicer in the RNA-targeting Cmr CRISPR complex, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 1257, 10.1093/nar/gku1355 · DOI
  35. Zuo, 2015, Crystal structures of the E. coli transcription initiation complexes with a complete bubble, Mol. Cell, 58, 534, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.010 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kazlauskiene, M., Tamulaitis, G., Kostiuk, G., Venclovas, Č., & Siksnys, V.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
295-306
ISSN
1097-2765
Cited by
265
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba (MIP-40/2013)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review