Cited by 132RNA Research and SplicingRNA regulation and diseaseRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

A Global Regulatory Mechanism for Activating an Exon Network Required for Neurogenesis

Open access
Raj, Bushra, Irimia, Manuel, Braunschweig, Ulrich, Sterne-Weiler, Timothy, O’Hanlon, Dave, Lin, Zhen-Yuan, Chen, Ginny I., Easton, Laura E. +4 more·2014·Molecular Cell

Abstract

The vertebrate and neural-specific Ser/Arg (SR)-related protein nSR100/SRRM4 regulates an extensive program of alternative splicing with critical roles in nervous system development. However, the mechanism by which nSR100 controls its target exons is poorly understood. We demonstrate that nSR100-dependent neural exons are associated with a unique configuration of intronic cis-elements that promote rapid switch-like regulation during neurogenesis. A key feature of this configuration is the insertion of specialized intronic enhancers between polypyrimidine tracts and acceptor sites that bind nSR100 to potently activate exon inclusion in neural cells while weakening 3' splice site recognition and contributing to exon skipping in nonneural cells. nSR100 further operates by forming multiple interactions with early spliceosome components bound proximal to 3' splice sites. These multifaceted interactions achieve dominance over neural exon silencing mediated by the splicing regulator PTBP1. The results thus illuminate a widespread mechanism by which a critical neural exon network is activated during neurogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.011

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous experimental perturbation of Rbfox1, SRRM4, and PTBP1 shows strong overlap with the differential splicing changes found in ASD cortex.

    “Previous experimental perturbation of three splicing factors, Rbfox1 (ref. 18), SRRM4 (ref. 19), and PTBP1 (ref. 20), shows strong overlap with the differential splicing changes found in ASD cortex, further supporting these predicted relationships (Fig. 1h, Extended Data Fig. 5b).”
  • SRRM4 and RBFOX1 expression are positively correlated, and PTBP1 and SRRM4 expression are anticorrelated.

    “the known positive correlation between SRRM4 and RBFOX1 and anticorrelation between PTBP1 and SRRM4 (refs 14,19)”
  • nSR100 promotes the inclusion of a subset of longer neural exons via binding to intronic UGC motifs proximal to suboptimal 3′ splice sites.

    “Recently, we have shown that nSR100 promotes the inclusion of a subset of (longer) neural exons via binding to intronic UGC motifs proximal to suboptimal 3′ splice sites (Raj et al., 2014).”
  • SRRM4 frequently binds UGC-rich sequences located between the polypyrimidine tract and the 3′ splice site of target exons.

    “SRRM4 frequently binds UGC-rich sequences located between the polypyrimidine tract and the 3′ splice site of target exons30.”

    From The neurogenetics of alternative splicing (2016) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raj, B., Irimia, M., Braunschweig, U., Sterne-Weiler, T., O’Hanlon, D., Lin, Z.-Y., Chen, G. I., Easton, L. E., Ule, J., Gingras, A.-C., Eyras, E., & Blencowe, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Blencowe, Benjamin J.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
90-103
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009302210
Cited by
132
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (089701)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
SRRM4, alternative splicing, neurogenesis, intronic enhancer, polypyrimidine tract, 3' splice site recognition, exon skipping, exon inclusion, spliceosome, PTBP1, cis-regulatory elements, splicing regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Exons, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Models, Genetic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Alternative Splicing, Mice, Neurogenesis, HEK293 Cells, Nucleotide Motifs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review