Cited by 28RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingRNA modifications and cancer

Quantitative profiling of human translation initiation reveals elements that potently regulate endogenous and therapeutically modified mRNAs

Open access
Lewis, Cole J.T., Xie, Li H., Bhandarkar, Shivani Milind, Jin, Danni, Abdallah, Kyrillos, Draycott, Austin S., Chen, Yixuan, Thoreen, Carson C. +1 more·2025·Molecular Cell

Abstract

mRNA therapeutics offer a potentially universal strategy for the efficient development and delivery of therapeutic proteins. Current mRNA vaccines include chemically modified nucleotides to reduce cellular immunogenicity. Here, we develop an efficient, high-throughput method to measure human translation initiation on therapeutically modified as well as endogenous RNAs. Using systems-level biochemistry, we quantify ribosome recruitment to tens of thousands of human 5' untranslated regions (UTRs) including alternative isoforms and identify sequences that mediate 200-fold effects. We observe widespread effects of coding sequences on translation initiation and identify small regulatory elements of 3-6 nucleotides that are sufficient to potently affect translational output. Incorporation of N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) selectively enhances translation by specific 5' UTRs that we demonstrate surpass those of current mRNA vaccines. Our approach is broadly applicable to dissecting mechanisms of human translation initiation and engineering more potent therapeutic mRNAs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.11.030

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. [1]Hinnebusch AG, and Lorsch JR (2012). The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation: new insights and challenges. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4. 10.1101/cshperspect.a011544. PMC3475172 22815232 · DOI
  2. [2]Floor SN, and Doudna JA (2016). Tunable protein synthesis by transcript isoforms in human cells. Elife 5. 10.7554/eLife.10921. PMC4764583 26735365 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Niederer RO, Rojas-Duran MF, Zinshteyn B, and Gilbert WV (2022). Direct analysis of ribosome targeting illuminates thousand-fold regulation of translation initiation. Cell Syst 13, 256– 264 e253. 10.1016/j.cels.2021.12.002. 35041803 PMC8930539 · DOI
  4. [4]Hinnebusch AG, Ivanov IP, and Sonenberg N. (2016). Translational control by 5’-untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs. Science 352, 1413– 1416. 10.1126/science.aad9868. 27313038 PMC7422601 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Jackson RJ, Hellen CU, and Pestova TV (2010). The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11, 113– 127. 10.1038/nrm2838. 20094052 PMC4461372 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Alexopoulou L, Holt AC, Medzhitov R, and Flavell RA (2001). Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413, 732– 738. 10.1038/35099560. 11607032 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [7]Rehwinkel J, and Gack MU (2020). RIG-I-like receptors: their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat Rev Immunol 20, 537– 551. 10.1038/s41577-020-0288-3. 32203325 PMC7094958 · DOI
  8. [8]Heil F, Hemmi H, Hochrein H, Ampenberger F, Kirschning C, Akira S, Lipford G, Wagner H, and Bauer S. (2004). Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science 303, 1526– 1529. 10.1126/science.1093620. 14976262 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [9]Robertson HD, and Mathews MB (1996). The regulation of the protein kinase PKR by RNA. Biochimie 78, 909– 914. 10.1016/s0300-9084(97)86712-0. 9150867 · DOI
  10. [10]Andries O, Mc Cafferty S, De Smedt SC, Weiss R, Sanders NN, and Kitada T. (2015). N(1)-methylpseudouridine-incorporated mRNA outperforms pseudouridine-incorporated mRNA by providing enhanced protein expression and reduced immunogenicity in mammalian cell lines and mice. J Control Release 217, 337– 344. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.051. 26342664 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [11]Kariko K, Buckstein M, Ni H, and Weissman D. (2005). Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA. Immunity 23, 165– 175. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008. 16111635 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [13]Lewis CJ, Pan T, and Kalsotra A. (2017). RNA modifications and structures cooperate to guide RNA-protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18, 202– 210. 10.1038/nrm.2016.163. 28144031 PMC5542016 · DOI
  13. [14]Gilbert WV, and Nachtergaele S. (2023). mRNA Regulation by RNA Modifications. Annu Rev Biochem 92, 175– 198. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-052521-035949. 37018844 PMC11192554 · DOI
  14. [15]Tanzer A, Hofacker IL, and Lorenz R. (2019). RNA modifications in structure prediction - Status quo and future challenges. Methods 156, 32– 39. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.10.019. 30385321 · DOI
  15. [16]Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, and Weissman JS (2009). Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324, 218– 223. 10.1126/science.1168978. 19213877 PMC2746483 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [17]Archer SK, Shirokikh NE, Beilharz TH, and Preiss T. (2016). Dynamics of ribosome scanning and recycling revealed by translation complex profiling. Nature 535, 570– 574. 10.1038/nature18647. 27437580 · DOI
  17. [18]Bohlen J, Fenzl K, Kramer G, Bukau B, and Teleman AA (2020). Selective 40S Footprinting Reveals Cap-Tethered Ribosome Scanning in Human Cells. Mol Cell 79, 561– 574 e565. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.005. 32589966 · DOI
  18. [19]Arribere JA, and Gilbert WV (2013). Roles for transcript leaders in translation and mRNA decay revealed by transcript leader sequencing. Genome Res 23, 977– 987. 10.1101/gr.150342.112. 23580730 PMC3668365 · DOI
  19. [21]Castillo-Hair S, Fedak S, Wang B, Linder J, Havens K, Certo M, and Seelig G. (2024). Optimizing 5’UTRs for mRNA-delivered gene editing using deep learning. Nat Commun 15, 5284. 10.1038/s41467-024-49508-2. 38902240 PMC11189900 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [22]Plassmeyer SP, Florian CP, Kasper MJ, Chase R, Mueller S, Liu Y, White KM, Jungers CF, Djuranovic SP, Djuranovic S, and Dougherty JD (2023). A Massively Parallel Screen of 5’UTR Mutations Identifies Variants Impacting Translation and Protein Production in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Genes. medRxiv. 10.1101/2023.11.02.23297961. · DOI
  21. [23]Cunningham F, Allen JE, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, Amode MR, Armean IM, Austine-Orimoloye O, Azov AG, Barnes I, Bennett R, (2022). Ensembl 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 50, D988– D995. 10.1093/nar/gkab1049. 34791404 PMC8728283 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [24]Bailey TL (2011). DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics 27, 1653– 1659. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr261. 21543442 PMC3106199 · DOI
  23. [25]Fuchs AL, Neu A, and Sprangers R. (2016). A general method for rapid and cost-efficient large-scale production of 5’ capped RNA. RNA 22, 1454– 1466. 10.1261/rna.056614.116. 27368341 PMC4986899 · DOI
  24. [26]Zubradt M, Gupta P, Persad S, Lambowitz AM, Weissman JS, and Rouskin S. (2017). DMS-MaPseq for genome-wide or targeted RNA structure probing in vivo. Nat Methods 14, 75– 82. 10.1038/nmeth.4057. 27819661 PMC5508988 · DOI
  25. [27]Miller M, Alvizo O, Chng C, Jenne S, Mayo M, Mukherjee A, Sundseth S, Chintala A, Penfield J, Riggins J, (2022). An Engineered T7 RNA Polymerase for efficient co-transcriptional capping with reduced dsRNA byproducts in mRNA synthesis. bioRxiv, 2022.2009.2001.506264. 10.1101/2022.09.01.506264. · DOI
  26. [28]Henderson JM, Ujita A, Hill E, Yousif-Rosales S, Smith C, Ko N, McReynolds T, Cabral CR, Escamilla-Powers JR, and Houston ME (2021). Cap 1 Messenger RNA Synthesis with Co-transcriptional CleanCap((R)) Analog by In Vitro Transcription. Curr Protoc 1, e39. 10.1002/cpz1.39. 33524237 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [29]Cetin B, Song GJ, and O’Leary SE (2020). Heterogeneous Dynamics of Protein-RNA Interactions across Transcriptome-Derived Messenger RNA Populations. J Am Chem Soc 142, 21249– 21253. 10.1021/jacs.0c09841. 33315378 PMC8062131 · DOI
  28. [30]Cetin B, and O’Leary SE (2022). mRNA- and factor-driven dynamic variability controls eIF4F-cap recognition for translation initiation. Nucleic Acids Res 50, 8240– 8261. 10.1093/nar/gkac631. 35871304 PMC9371892 · DOI
  29. [31]Pisarev AV, Kolupaeva VG, Yusupov MM, Hellen CU, and Pestova TV (2008). Ribosomal position and contacts of mRNA in eukaryotic translation initiation complexes. EMBO J 27, 1609– 1621. 10.1038/emboj.2008.90. 18464793 PMC2426728 · DOI
  30. [32]Lee S, Liu B, Lee S, Huang SX, Shen B, and Qian SB (2012). Global mapping of translation initiation sites in mammalian cells at single-nucleotide resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, E2424– 2432. 10.1073/pnas.1207846109. 22927429 PMC3443142 · DOI
  31. [33]Hinnebusch AG (2014). The scanning mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation. Annu Rev Biochem 83, 779– 812. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035802. 24499181 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [34]Kozak M. (1986). Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell 44, 283– 292. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2. 3943125 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [35]Gleason AC, Ghadge G, Sonobe Y, and Roos RP (2022). Kozak Similarity Score Algorithm Identifies Alternative Translation Initiation Codons Implicated in Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 23. 10.3390/ijms231810564. PMC9506484 36142475 · DOI
  34. [36]Hernandez G, Garcia A, Weingarten-Gabbay S, Mishra RK, Hussain T, Amiri M, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Montiel-Davalos A, Lasko P, and Sonenberg N. (2023). Functional analysis of the AUG initiator codon context reveals novel conserved sequences that disfavor mRNA translation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 10.1093/nar/gkad1152. PMC10853783 38038264 · DOI
  35. [37]Philippe L, van den Elzen AMG, Watson MJ, and Thoreen CC (2020). Global analysis of LARP1 translation targets reveals tunable and dynamic features of 5’ TOP motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117, 5319– 5328. 10.1073/pnas.1912864117. 32094190 PMC7071917 · DOI
  36. [38]Nance KD, and Meier JL (2021). Modifications in an Emergency: The Role of N1-Methylpseudouridine in COVID-19 Vaccines. ACS Cent Sci 7, 748– 756. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00197. 34075344 PMC8043204 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [39]Kumar P, Hellen CU, and Pestova TV (2016). Toward the mechanism of eIF4F-mediated ribosomal attachment to mammalian capped mRNAs. Genes Dev 30, 1573– 1588. 10.1101/gad.282418.116. 27401559 PMC4949329 · DOI
  38. [41]Corbett KS, Edwards DK, Leist SR, Abiona OM, Boyoglu-Barnum S, Gillespie RA, Himansu S, Schafer A, Ziwawo CT, DiPiazza AT, (2020). SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness. Nature 586, 567– 571. 10.1038/s41586-020-2622-0. 32756549 PMC7581537 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [42]Fan A, and Sharp PP (2021). Inhibitors of Eukaryotic Translational Machinery as Therapeutic Agents. J Med Chem 64, 2436– 2465. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01746. 33592144 · DOI
  40. [43]Hao P, Yu J, Ward R, Liu Y, Hao Q, An S, and Xu T. (2020). Eukaryotic translation initiation factors as promising targets in cancer therapy. Cell Commun Signal 18, 175. 10.1186/s12964-020-00607-9. 33148274 PMC7640403 · DOI
  41. [44]Demircioglu D, Cukuroglu E, Kindermans M, Nandi T, Calabrese C, Fonseca NA, Kahles A, Lehmann KV, Stegle O, Brazma A, (2019). A Pan-cancer Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Pervasive Regulation through Alternative Promoters. Cell 178, 1465– 1477 e1417. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.018. 31491388 · DOI · Paper page
  42. [45]Weber R, Ghoshdastider U, Spies D, Dure C, Valdivia-Francia F, Forny M, Ormiston M, Renz PF, Taborsky D, Yigit M, (2023). Monitoring the 5’UTR landscape reveals isoform switches to drive translational efficiencies in cancer. Oncogene 42, 638– 650. 10.1038/s41388-022-02578-2. 36550360 PMC9957725 · DOI
  43. [46]Dodt M, Roehr JT, Ahmed R, and Dieterich C. (2012). FLEXBAR-Flexible Barcode and Adapter Processing for Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms. Biology (Basel) 1, 895– 905. 10.3390/biology1030895. 24832523 PMC4009805 · DOI
  44. [47]Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, and Gingeras TR (2013). STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15– 21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. 23104886 PMC3530905 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [48]van den Elzen AMG, Watson MJ, and Thoreen CC (2022). mRNA 5’ terminal sequences drive 200-fold differences in expression through effects on synthesis, translation and decay. PLoS Genet 18, e1010532. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010532. PMC9731452 36441824 · DOI
  46. [49]Philippe L, Vasseur JJ, Debart F, and Thoreen CC (2018). La-related protein 1 (LARP1) repression of TOP mRNA translation is mediated through its cap-binding domain and controlled by an adjacent regulatory region. Nucleic Acids Res 46, 1457– 1469. 10.1093/nar/gkx1237. 29244122 PMC5814973 · DOI
  47. [50]Lorenz R, Bernhart SH, Honer Zu Siederdissen C, Tafer H, Flamm C, Stadler PF, and Hofacker IL (2011). ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol Biol 6, 26. 10.1186/1748-7188-6-26. 22115189 PMC3319429 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [51]Love MI, Huber W, and Anders S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15, 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. 25516281 PMC4302049 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, C. J. T., Xie, L. H., Bhandarkar, S. M., Jin, D., Abdallah, K., Draycott, A. S., Chen, Y., Thoreen, C. C., & Gilbert, W. V.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Thoreen, Carson C.
  • Gilbert, Wendy V.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
445-459.e5
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405567020
Cited by
28
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer (ITEN2021.RNA01)
  • National Cancer Institute (F31CA254339)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F31DK129022)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM132358)
  • National Science Foundation (2330451, DGE2139841)
  • American Cancer Society (PF-23-1144579-01-RMC)
  • National Institutes of Health (R35GM152167)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
translation initiation, mRNA therapeutics, mRNA vaccines, chemically modified nucleotides, N1-methylpseudouridine, 5' untranslated region, ribosome recruitment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review