Cited by 810Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInflammation biomarkers and pathwaysVitamin C and Antioxidants Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed?

Marshall, John C.·2014·Trends in Molecular Medicine

Abstract

The systemic inflammatory response is biologically complex, redundant, and activated by both infectious and noninfectious triggers. Its manipulation can cause both benefit and harm. More than 100 randomized clinical trials have tested the hypothesis that modulating the septic response to infection can improve survival. With one short-lived exception, none of these has resulted in new treatments. The current challenge for sepsis research lies in a failure of concept and reluctance to abandon a demonstrably ineffectual research model. Future success will necessitate large studies of clinical and biochemical epidemiology to understand the course of illness, better integration of basic and clinical science, and the creation of stratification systems to target treatment towards those who are most likely to benefit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.007

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, Achievements in public health, 1900–1999, MMWR, 48, 621

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 810

Metadata

Authors
Marshall, J. C.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Marshall, John C.
Venue
Trends in Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
195-203
ISSN
1471-4914 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991209345
Cited by
805
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 12
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Keywords
sepsis, clinical trial failure, systemic inflammatory response, sepsis treatment, translational research, patient stratification, sepsis epidemiology, inflammatory markers
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Immunologic Factors, Treatment Outcome, Sepsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review