Cited by 22Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Diffusion MRI detects longitudinal white matter changes in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Nie, Xingju, Falangola, Maria Fatima, Ward, Ralph, McKinnon, Emilie T., Helpern, Joseph A., Nietert, Paul J., Jensen, Jens H.·2019·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

The sensitivity of multiple diffusion MRI (dMRI) parameters to longitudinal changes in white matter microstructure was investigated for the 3xTg-AD transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, which manifests both amyloid beta plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. By employing a specific dMRI method known as diffusional kurtosis imaging, eight different diffusion parameters were quantified to characterize distinct aspects of water diffusion. Four female 3xTg-AD mice were imaged at five time points, ranging from 4.5 to 18 months of age, and the diffusion parameters were investigated in four white matter regions (fimbria, external capsule, internal capsule and corpus callosum). Significant changes were observed in several diffusion parameters, particularly in the fimbria and in the external capsule, with a statistically significant decrease in diffusivity and a statistically significant increase in kurtosis. Our preliminary results demonstrate that dMRI can detect microstructural changes in white matter for the 3xTg-AD mouse model due to aging and/or progression of pathology, depending strongly on the diffusion parameter and anatomical region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2018.12.003

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors found that dMRI metrics change longitudinally with aging and AD pathology progression in several brain regions.

    “Moreover, we found that dMRI metrics change longitudinally with aging [16] and AD pathology progression [17] in several brain regions.”

    From Brain microstructure abnormalities in the 3xTg-AD mouse – A diffusion MRI and morphology correlation study (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results report longitudinal changes in dMRI measures across several white-matter regions of 3xTg-AD mice. The Discussion suggests that some changes accompany AD-like pathology progression, but says the absence of a control group prevents separating pathology-related changes from aging; it does not establish that progression caused the measured changes. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The inconsistent findings among DTI studies suggest that age-related diffusion metrics changes in the 3×Tg-AD mouse model are complex.

    “The inconsistent findings among these DTI studies suggest that age-related diffusion metrics changes in the 3×Tg-AD mouse model are complex (Nie et al., 2019).”

    From Multimodal MRI combined with RNA sequencing reveals pathological signatures in the 9-month-old 3×Tg-AD mouse brain (2026) · cites this paper as Nie et al., 2019

    The Discussion describes conflicting diffusion-metric findings across studies and notes that methodological differences make direct comparison difficult. It also says there was only one prior dMRI study of white matter in 3xTg-AD mice, and that study did not report age-related trajectories. Thus, the paper supports complexity in interpreting the changes, but not inconsistent age-related findings among multiple DTI studies of this specific model. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other studies conducted on the same model in mice at ages 2, 12, and 14 months identified significant WM alterations.

    “Conversely, other studies conducted on the same model in mice at ages 2, 12, and 14 months identified significant WM alterations (Manno et al., 2019; Nie et al., 2019; Falangola et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. [1]Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function. Neuroimage. 2012 6 1; 61(2): 324– 41. 22120012 PMC3683822
  2. [2]Theuring F, Thunecke M, Kosciessa U, Turner JD. Transgenic animals as models of neurodegenerative diseases in humans 1997; 151: 320– 5. 9263480
  3. [4]Oddo S, Caccamo A, Shepherd JD, Murphy MP, Golde TE, Kayed R, Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Abeta and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron 2003; 39: 409– 21. 12895417
  4. [7]Mastrangelo MA, Bowers WJ. Detailed immunohistochemical characterization of temporal and spatial progression of Alzheimer’s disease-related pathologies in male triple-transgenic mice. BMC Neurosci 2008; 9: 81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-81. 18700006 PMC2527610 · DOI
  5. [8]Ghosh D, LeVault KR, Barnett AJ, Brewer GJ. A reversible early oxidized redox state that precedes macromolecular ROS damage in aging nontransgenic and 3xTg-AD mouse neurons. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 5821– 32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6192-11.2012. 22539844 PMC3376759 · DOI
  6. [9]Dunn HC, Ager RR, Baglietto-Vargas D, Cheng D, Kitazawa M, Cribbs DH, Restoration of lipoxin A4 signaling reduces Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in the 3xTg-AD mouse model. J Alzheimers Dis 2015; 43: 893– 903. doi: 10.3233/JAD-141335. 25125468 PMC4319708 · DOI
  7. [10]Stover KR, Campbell MA, Van Winssen CM, Brown RE. Early detection of cognitive deficits in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Brain Res 2015; 289: 29– 38. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.012. 25896362 · DOI
  8. [11]Clark JK, Furgerson M, Crystal JD, Fechheimer M, Furukawa R, Wagner JJ. Alterations in synaptic plasticity coincide with deficits in spatial working memory in presymptomatic 3xTg-AD mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2015; 125: 152– 62. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.09.003. 26385257 PMC4648633 · DOI
  9. [12]Takano T, Han X, Deane R, Zlokovic B, Nedergaard M. Two-photon imaging of astrocytic Ca2+ signaling and the microvasculature in experimental mice models of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1097: 40– 50. doi: 10.1196/annals.1379.004. 17413008 · DOI
  10. [13]Lin AJ, Koike MA, Green KN, Kim JG, Mazhar A, Rice TB, Spatial frequency domain imaging of intrinsic optical property contrast in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Biomed Eng 2011; 39: 1349– 57. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0269-6. 21331663 PMC3069335 · DOI
  11. [14]Kastyak-Ibrahim MZ, Di Curzio DL, Buist R, Herrera SL, Albensi BC, Del Bigio MR, Neurofibrillary tangles and plaques are not accompanied by white matter pathology in aged triple transgenic-Alzheimer disease mice. Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 31: 1515– 21. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.06.013. 23993791 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [16]Oddo S, Caccamo A, Kitazawa M, Tseng BP, LaFerla FM. Amyloid deposition precedes tangle formation in a triple transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2003; 24: 1063– 70. 14643377
  13. [17]Desai MK, Sudol KL, Janelsins MC, Mastrangelo MA, Frazer ME, Bowers WJ. Triple-transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice exhibit region-specific abnormalities in brain myelination patterns prior to appearance of amyloid and tau pathology. Glia 2009; 57: 54– 65. doi: 10.1002/glia.20734. 18661556 PMC2584762 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [19]Desai MK, Guercio BJ, Narrow WC, Bowers WJ. An Alzheimer’s disease-relevant presenilin-1 mutation augments amyloid-beta-induced oligodendrocyte dysfunction. Glia 2011; 59: 627– 40. doi: 10.1002/glia.21131. 21294162 PMC3045399 · DOI
  15. [20]Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1432– 40. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20508. 15906300 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [21]Jensen JH, Helpern JA. MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed 2010; 23: 698– 710. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1518. 20632416 PMC2997680 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [22]Falangola MF, Jensen JH, Babb JS, Hu C, Castellanos FX, Di Martino A, Age-related non-Gaussian diffusion patterns in the prefrontal brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 1345– 50. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21604. 19025941 PMC2669671 · DOI
  18. [23]Gong NJ, Wong CS, Chan CC, Leung LM, Chu YC. Aging in deep gray matter and white matter revealed by diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35: 2203– 16. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.011. 24910392 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [24]Das SK, Wang JL, Bing L, Bhetuwal A, Yang HF. Regional Values of Diffusional Kurtosis Estimates in the Healthy Brain during Normal Aging. Clin Neuroradiol 2017; 27: 283– 98. doi: 10.1007/s00062-015-0490-z. 26729366 · DOI
  20. [25]Coutu JP, Chen JJ, Rosas HD, Salat DH. Non-Gaussian water diffusion in aging white matter. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35: 1412– 21. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.12.001. 24378085 PMC3961541 · DOI
  21. [26]Struyfs H, Van Hecke W, Veraart J, Sijbers J, Slaets S, De Belder M, Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: A Possible MRI Biomarker for AD Diagnosis? J Alzheimers Dis 2015; 48: 937– 48. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150253. 26444762 PMC4927852 · DOI
  22. [27]Yuan L, Sun M, Chen Y, Long M, Zhao X, Yin J, Non-Gaussian diffusion alterations on diffusion kurtosis imaging in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 2016; 616: 11– 8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.021. 26797581 · DOI
  23. [28]Fieremans E, Jensen JH, Helpern JA. White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage 2011; 58: 177– 88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006. 21699989 PMC3136876 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [29]Fieremans E, Benitez A, Jensen JH, Falangola MF, Tabesh A, Deardorff RL, Novel white matter tract integrity metrics sensitive to Alzheimer disease progression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34: 2105– 12. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3553. 23764722 PMC3962262 · DOI
  25. [30]Benitez A, Fieremans E, Jensen JH, Falangola MF, Tabesh A, Ferris SH, White matter tract integrity metrics reflect the vulnerability of late-myelinating tracts in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin 2014; 4: 64– 71. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.001. 24319654 PMC3853114 · DOI
  26. [31]Benitez A, Jensen JH, Falangola MF, Nietert PJ, Helpern JA, 2018 Modeling white matter tract integrity in aging with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neurobiol. Aging 70, 265– 275. 30055412 PMC6195210
  27. [32]Cheung MM, Hui ES, Chan KC, Helpern JA, Qi L, Wu EX. Does diffusion kurtosis imaging lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study. Neuroimage 2009; 45: 386– 92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.018. 19150655 · DOI
  28. [33]Falangola MF, Guilfoyle DN, Tabesh A, Hui ES, Nie X, Jensen JH, Histological correlation of diffusional kurtosis and white matter modeling metrics in cuprizone-induced corpus callosum demyelination. NMR Biomed 2014; 27: 948– 57. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3140. 24890981 PMC5297373 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [34]Nie X, Hamlett ED, Granholm AC, Hui ES, Helpern JA, Jensen JH, Evidence of altered age-related brain cytoarchitecture in mouse models of down syndrome: a diffusional kurtosis imaging study. Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 33: 437– 47. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.12.008. 25527393 PMC4747671 · DOI
  30. [35]Vanhoutte G, Pereson S, Delgado YPR, Guns PJ, Asselbergh B, Veraart J, Diffusion kurtosis imaging to detect amyloidosis in an APP/PS1 mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 1115– 21. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24680. 23494926 · DOI
  31. [37]Tabesh A, Jensen JH, Ardekani BA, Helpern JA. Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 823– 36. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22655. 21337412 PMC3042509 · DOI
  32. [38]Lu H, Jensen JH, Ramani A, Helpern JA. Three-dimensional characterization of non-gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 236– 47. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1020. 16521095 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [39]Glenn GR, Helpern JA, Tabesh A, Jensen JH. Quantitative assessment of diffusional kurtosis anisotropy. NMR Biomed 2015; 28: 448– 59. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3271. 25728763 PMC4378654 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [40]Veraart J, Poot DH, Van Hecke W, Blockx I, Van der Linden A, Verhoye M, More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion Kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 138– 45. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22603. 20878760 · DOI
  35. [41]Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods. 2012 6 28; 9(7): 671. 22930834 PMC5554542
  36. [42]Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates Compact 2n. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
  37. [43]Akaike H A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 1974; 19: 716– 723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705. · DOI · Paper page
  38. [44]Yoshida S, Oishi K, Faria AV, Mori S. Diffusion tensor imaging of normal brain development. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43: 15– 27. doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2496-x. 23288475 PMC3703661 · DOI
  39. [45]Sun SW, Song SK, Harms MP, Lin SJ, Holtzman DM, Merchant KM, Detection of age-dependent brain injury in a mouse model of brain amyloidosis associated with Alzheimer’s disease using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Exp Neurol 2005; 191: 77– 85. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.09.006. 15589514 · DOI · Paper page
  40. [46]Sahara N, Perez PD, Lin WL, Dickson DW, Ren Y, Zeng H, Age-related decline in white matter integrity in a mouse model of tauopathy: an in vivo diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35: 1364– 74. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.12.009. 24411290 PMC4729397 · DOI · Paper page
  41. [47]Hirata-Fukae C, Li HF, Hoe HS, Gray AJ, Minami SS, Hamada K, Niikura T, Hua F, Tsukagoshi-Nagai H, Horikoshi-Sakuraba Y, Mughal M, Rebeck GW, LaFerla FM, Mattson MP, Iwata N, Saido TC, Klein WL, Duff KE, Aisen PS, Matsuoka Y. Females exhibit more extensive amyloid, but not tau, pathology in an Alzheimer transgenic model. Brain Res. 2008; 1216: 92– 103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.079. 18486110 · DOI · Paper page
  42. [48]Carroll JC, Rosario ER, Kreimer S, Villamagna A, Gentzschein E, Stanczyk FZ, Pike CJ. Sex differences in β-amyloid accumulation in 3xTg-AD mice: role of neonatal sex steroid hormone exposure. Brain Res. 2010 12 17; 1366: 233– 45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.009 20934413 PMC2993873 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [49]Thomas AG, Koumellis P, Dineen RA. The fornix in health and disease: an imaging review. Radiographics 2011; 31: 1107– 21. doi: 10.1148/rg.314105729. 21768242 · DOI
  44. [50]Amaral RSC, Park MTM, Devenyi GA, Lynn V, Pipitone J, Winterburn J, Manual segmentation of the fornix, fimbria, and alveus on high-resolution 3T MRI: Application via fully-automated mapping of the human memory circuit white and grey matter in healthy and pathological aging. Neuroimage 2018; 170: 132– 50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.027. 27765611 · DOI
  45. [51]Gonzalez-Lima F, Berndt JD, Valla JE, Games D, Reiman EM. Reduced corpus callosum, fornix and hippocampus in PDAPP transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport 2001; 12: 2375– 9. 11496113
  46. [52]Jang SH, Cho SH, Chang MC. Age-related degeneration of the fornix in the human brain: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Int J Neurosci 2011; 121: 94– 100. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2010.531894. 21062216 · DOI
  47. [53]Amlien IK, Fjell AM. Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuroscience 2014; 276: 206– 15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.02.017. 24583036 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [54]Chen DQ, Strauss I, Hayes DJ, Davis KD, Hodaie M. Age-related changes in diffusion tensor imaging metrics of fornix subregions in healthy humans. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2015; 93: 151– 9. doi: 10.1159/000368442. 25790958 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nie, X., Falangola, M. F., Ward, R., McKinnon, E. T., Helpern, J. A., Nietert, P. J., & Jensen, J. H.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Nie, Xingju
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
57
Pages
235-242
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904488874
Cited by
22
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1RF1AG057602-01, T32DC014435)
  • The Litwin Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
diffusion MRI, white matter microstructure, Alzheimer's disease, 3xTg-AD mice, diffusion kurtosis imaging, longitudinal change, fimbria, external capsule, internal capsule, corpus callosum, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, aging, water diffusion
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Disease Progression, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review