Cited by 56Bone Tissue Engineering Materialsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

A novel nano-hydroxyapatite—PMMA hybrid scaffolds adopted by conjugated thermal induced phase separation (TIPS) and wet-chemical approach: analysis of its mechanical and biological properties

G, Radha, S, Balakumar, Venkatesan, Balaji, Vellaichamy, Elangovan·2017·Materials Science and Engineering: C

Abstract

In this study, we report the preparation of nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAp) incorporated poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) scaffolds by conjugated thermal induced phase separation (TIPS) and wet-chemical approach, which essentially facilitates the enhancement of both mechanical as well as biological properties of the scaffolds. The dissolution of PMMA was accomplished by acetone (Ace scaffold), ethanol-water (E-W scaffold) and isopropanol-water (I-W scaffold) mixtures as solvents. The existence of nHAp in PMMA matrix was investigated systematically. The higher degree of porous architecture was achieved from Ace scaffolds compared to both I-W and E-W scaffolds. On the other hand, the dense porous architecture of the I-W scaffold exhibited superior hardness and compressive strength than that of the Ace and E-W scaffolds. All the fabricated samples demonstrated enhanced in vitro bioactivity with respect to increasing immersion period as a result of flower-like in vitro apatite layer formation. The MTT assay was carried out for 1day and 3day culture using Saos-2 osteoblast-like cells, which showed better cell proliferation with increasing culture period owing to the interconnected pore architecture of scaffolds and the rational hemocompatibility as per the ASTM standard F756-00.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.133

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
G, R., S, B., Venkatesan, B., & Vellaichamy, E.
Affiliations
University of Madras (IN)
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
75
Pages
221-228
ISSN
0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558084908
Cited by
56
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
UGC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, poly(methyl methacrylate), hybrid scaffolds, thermally induced phase separation, wet chemical processing, porous architecture, compressive strength, in vitro bioactivity, apatite layer formation, cell proliferation, hemocompatibility, bone tissue engineering
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Humans, Materials Testing, Osteoblasts, Durapatite, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Cell Proliferation, Nanocomposites, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review