The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering
Abstract
3D printing-based technologies can fabricate scaffolds offer great precision to control internal architecture and print complicated structures based upon the defect site. However, the materials used in the direct printing are restricted depending on the printing technology used and the indirect one can overcome this limitation. In the present study, indirect 3D printing approach was used to develop bone scaffolds from polylactic acid/ polycaprolactone/ hydroxyapatite (PLA/PCL/HA) composites. Casting of the composite suspensions was done into a dissolvable 3D printed negative mold, in order to achieve simultaneous macro- and micro-porous composites, using freeze drying/particle leaching method. To evaluate morphology, functional groups, and elemental analysis of the scaffolds, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were respectively used. Scaffolds' porosity was measured with the aid of liquid replacement technique. Also, the mechanical strength of scaffolds was examined by compression test and measuring the compressive modulus Considering the microstructure, porosity and pore size as well as mechanical property, the scaffold composed of PLA/PCL 70/30 w/w and 35% HA was more favorable. The PLA/PCL/HA 70/30-35% scaffold presented a porosity of 77%, an average pore size of 160 μm, and Young's modulus of 1.35 MPa. Cell adhesion, viability and mineral deposits formation for PLA/PCL/HA scaffolds at PLA/PCL ratios of 70/30, 50/50 and 30/70 and the fixed amount of HA (35%) were also studied in vitro by the means of MG63 cells. The cytotoxicity assessment showed that the cells could be viable and proliferate on the scaffolds. The results indicated that composite scaffold with the PLA/PCL weight ratio of70/30 accomplished more favorable properties in terms of biocompatibility, viability, and osteoinduction property.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Oryan, A., Eslaminejad, M. B., Kamali, A., Hosseini, S., Moshiri, A., & Baharvand, H. (2018) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-018-2837-7 · Cited by 33
Self-citationRetractedPorous scaffold design for tissue engineering
Hollister, S. J. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1421 · Cited by 3,969
Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices
Middleton, J. C., & Tipton, A. J. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00101-0 · Cited by 2,741
The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors
Yang, S., Leong, K.-F., Du, Z., & Chua, C.-K. (2001) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632701753337645 · Cited by 2,234
The application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering materials
Chen, G.-Q., & Wu, Q. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.036 · Cited by 1,418
Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering
Ma, P. X. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.041 · Cited by 1,310
Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering
Stevens, M. M. (2008) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(08)70086-5 · Cited by 1,202
3D Printing of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration Applications
Do, A., Khorsand, B., Geary, S. M., & Salem, A. K. (2015) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201500168 · Cited by 949
Polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration
Seal, B. (2001) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/s0927-796x(01)00035-3 · Cited by 892
Mondal, D., Griffith, M., & Venkatraman, S. S. (2016) · International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials · doi:10.1080/00914037.2015.1103241 · Cited by 515
Cited by
3D printing PCL/nHA bone scaffolds: exploring the influence of material synthesis techniques
Zimmerling, A., Yazdanpanah, Z., Cooper, D. M. L., Johnston, J. D., & Chen, X. (2021) · Biomaterials Research · doi:10.1186/s40824-021-00204-y · Cited by 151
Ebrahimi, Z., Irani, S., Ardeshirylajimi, A., & Seyedjafari, E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15602-y · Cited by 141
Yedekçi, B., Tezcaner, A., Yılmaz, B., Demir, T., & Evis, Z. (2022) · Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104941 · Cited by 35
Development and characterization of PLA/PCL blend filaments and 3D printed scaffolds
Eryildiz, M., Karakus, A., & Altan Eksi, M. (2025) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-024-10247-6 · Cited by 27
Eryildiz, M., Karakus, A., Demirci, M., Altintas Kadirhan, O., & Eksi Altan, M. (2025) · Polymers for Advanced Technologies · doi:10.1002/pat.70133 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassanajili, S., Karami-Pour, A., Oryan, A., & Talaei-Khozani, T.
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 104
- Pages
- 109960
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2953851434
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 11.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109960
- The paper
- Hassanajili, S., Karami-Pour, A., Oryan, A., & Talaei-Khozani, T. (2019). Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109960
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.