The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical cancer nanomedicine
Open accessAbstract
Nanotechnology offers new solutions for the development of cancer therapeutics that display improved efficacy and safety. Although several nanotherapeutics have received clinical approval, the most promising nanotechnology applications for patients still lie ahead. Nanoparticles display unique transport, biological, optical, magnetic, electronic, and thermal properties that are not apparent on the molecular or macroscale, and can be utilized for therapeutic purposes. These characteristics arise because nanoparticles are in the same size range as the wavelength of light and display large surface area to volume ratios. The large size of nanoparticles compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents or biological macromolecule drugs also enables incorporation of several supportive components in addition to active pharmaceutical ingredients. These components can facilitate solubilization, protection from degradation, sustained release, immunoevasion, tissue penetration, imaging, targeting, and triggered activation. Nanoparticles are also processed differently in the body compared to conventional drugs. Specifically, nanoparticles display unique hemodynamic properties and biodistribution profiles. Notably, the interactions that occur at the bio-nano interface can be exploited for improved drug delivery. This review discusses successful clinically approved cancer nanodrugs as well as promising candidates in the pipeline. These nanotherapeutics are categorized according to whether they predominantly exploit multifunctionality, unique electromagnetic properties, or distinct transport characteristics in the body. Moreover, future directions in nanomedicine such as companion diagnostics, strategies for modifying the microenvironment, spatiotemporal nanoparticle transitions, and the use of extracellular vesicles for drug delivery are also explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Aikawa, E., Alcaraz, M. J., Anderson, J. D., Andriantsitohaina, R., Antoniou, A., Arab, T., Archer, F., Atkin‐Smith, G. K., et al. (2018) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 · Cited by 11,099
Self-citationRecognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3
Alexopoulou, L., Holt, A. C., Medzhitov, R., & Flavell, R. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35099560 · Cited by 6,129
Doxil® — The first FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned
Barenholz, Y. (. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020 · Cited by 4,792
Kalluri, R., & Zeisberg, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1877 · Cited by 4,538
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives
Knop, K., Hoogenboom, R., Fischer, D., & Schubert, U. S. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200902672 · Cited by 3,533
Drug penetration in solid tumours
Minchinton, A. I., & Tannock, I. F. (2006) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1893 · Cited by 2,805
Exosomes facilitate therapeutic targeting of oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic cancer
Kamerkar, S., LeBleu, V. S., Sugimoto, H., Yang, S., Ruivo, C. F., Melo, S. A., Lee, J. J., & Kalluri, R. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22341 · Cited by 2,639
Systemic RNA delivery to dendritic cells exploits antiviral defence for cancer immunotherapy
Kranz, L. M., Diken, M., Haas, H., Kreiter, S., Loquai, C., Reuter, K. C., Meng, M., Fritz, D., Vascotto, F., Hefesha, H., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18300 · Cited by 1,819
Wang, H.-X., Li, M., Lee, C. M., Chakraborty, S., Kim, H.-W., Bao, G., & Leong, K. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00799 · Cited by 560
Cited by
Moradi Kashkooli, F., Soltani, M., & Souri, M. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.012 · Cited by 514
Engineering mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery: where are we after two decades?
Vallet-Regí, M., Schüth, F., Lozano, D., Colilla, M., & Manzano, M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00659b · Cited by 507
Extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery systems for cancer treatment
Walker, S., Busatto, S., Pham, A., Tian, M., Suh, A., Carson, K., Quintero, A., Lafrence, M., Malik, H., Santana, M. X., et al. (2019) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.37097 · Cited by 429
Self-citationSupramolecular cancer nanotheranostics
Zhou, J., Rao, L., Yu, G., Cook, T. R., Chen, X., & Huang, F. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00011f · Cited by 411
Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies
Soetaert, F., Korangath, P., Serantes, D., Fiering, S., & Ivkov, R. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.025 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfram, J., & Ferrari, M.
- Venue
- Nano Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- 85-98
- ISSN
- 1748-0132 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921868990
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 16.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical cancer nanomedicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nantod.2019.02.005
- The paper
- Wolfram, J., & Ferrari, M. (2019). Clinical cancer nanomedicine. Nano Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2019.02.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
